Advertisement

Public perception, knowledge and policy support for mitigation and adaption to Climate Change in Costa Rica: Comparisons with North American and European studies

  • R. Vignola
  • S. Klinsky
  • J. Tam
  • T. McDaniels
Original Article

Abstract

Over the past 20 years considerable efforts have been invested in exploring how the public understands climate change. However, the bulk of this research has been conducted in Europe and North America and little is known about public perceptions of climate change in developing countries. This article presents the results of the first nationally representative study (n = 1473) of public perceptions of climate change in Costa Rica. In Costa Rica, a large proportion of interviewees (i.e. over 85%) are highly concerned about climate change in general and feel, as noted in European and North American studies, that its impacts are more worrisome for people farthest away (e.g. in the developed countries or among future generations). At the local level, people feel that food (10.5%) and water (16.1%) shortages as well as poverty (11.3%) and heat waves (11.7%) are the most expected impacts of climate change. Analysis of adaptation behaviour responses suggest that individuals have a relatively lower grasp of emergency and prevention disaster plans but are relatively more proactive in preventing hydro-meteorological extremes related to water scarcity or excess. A majority of respondents engage in mitigation behaviours largely for financial or contextual reasons. Finally, support for adaptation and mitigation policy responses is generally high (i.e. above 70% of interviewee supports them) except for the case of internalizing the cost of watershed protection increasing the water tariffs (52.5%). As discussions about mitigation and adaptation become increasingly common within developing countries, questions about public perceptions in that context are more pressing than ever. Work on climate perceptions needs to be carried out in specific countries to better understand which policies are most likely to resonate with public support, and which might be most difficult to implement.

Keywords

Climate change Public perception Costa Rica Mitigation Adaptation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Initiative Peace with Nature of the Government of Costa Rica for supporting this research and the Country office of the United Nations Development Program. We also would like to thank Marco Otarola and Sylvia Leon for their support in the initial phases of the survey. The contents of this document are the sole responsibility of the authors and can under no circumstances be regarded as reflecting the position of the organizations involved. This research was supported by a grant from the International Opportunities Fund of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada to the University of British Columbia. The efforts of Tim McDaniels and Raffaele Vignola were supported by the Climate and Energy Decision-Making Center (CEDM) located in the Department of Engineering and Public Policy, through a cooperative agreement between the National Science Foundation (SES-0949710) and Carnegie Mellon University. The CEDM in turn supports researchers in the Institute for Resources, Environment and Sustainability at the University of British Columbia.

References

  1. Adelekan IO, Gbadegesin AS (2005) Analysis of the public perception of climate change issues in an indigenous African city. Int J Environ Stud 62(1)Google Scholar
  2. Antilla L (2005) Climate of skepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environ Change-Hum Policy Dimens 15(4):338–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Asiyanbi AP (2011) “I don’t get this climate stuff!” Climate change knowledge, perception and concern among corporate elites in Lagos. Unpublished dissertation, King’s College London, United KingdomGoogle Scholar
  4. Bales S (2007) Framing global warming in Canada: a frameworks message memo. Frameworks Institute, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell A (1994) Climate of opinion - public and media discourse on the global environment. Discourse Soc 5(1):33–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Billett S (2009) Dividing climate change: global warming in the Indian mass media. Climatic Change 99(1–2):1–16Google Scholar
  7. Blum N (2007) Environmental education in Costa Rica: building a framework for sustainable development? Int J Educ Dev 28(3):348–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bord RJ, Fisher A, O’Connor RE (1998) Public perceptions of global warming: United States and International Perspectives. Clim Res 11(1):75–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bord RJ, O’Connor RE, Fisher A (2000) In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change? Publ Understand Sci 9(3):205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bostrom A, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Read D (1994) What do people know about global climate-change .1. Mental Models. Risk Anal 14(6):959–970CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2004) Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environ Change-Hum Policy Dimens 14(2):125–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brechin S (2003) Comparative public opinion and knowledge on global climatic change and the Kyoto Protocol: the US versus the world? Int J Sociol Soc Pol 23(10):106–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brossard D, Shanahan J, McComas K (2004) Are issue-cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Comm Soc 7(3):359–377CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brouwer R, Akter S, Brander L, Haque E (2007) Socioeconomic vulnerability and adaptation to environmental risk: a case study of climate change and flooding in Bangladesh. Risk Anal 27(2):313–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bulkeley H (2000) Common knowledge? Public understanding of climate change in Newcastle, Australia. Publ Understand Sci 9:313–333CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bunce M, Rosendo S, Brown K (2010) Perceptions of climate change, multiple stressors and livelihoods on marginal African coasts. Environ Dev Sustain 12(3):407–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Carson R, Louviere J, Wei E (2010) Alternative australian climate change plans: the public’s views. Energy Policy 38:902–911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Carvalho A, Burgess J (2005) Cultural circuits of climate change in UK broadsheet newspapers, 1985-2003. Risk Anal 25(6):1457–1469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Comité Nacional de Emergencia (CNE) (1993) Organización nacional del País para casos de emergencia o desastre. Comisión Nacional de Emergencia (Direccion de Planes y Operaciones), San Jose, Costa RicaGoogle Scholar
  20. Darier É, Schüle R (1999) Think globally, act locally? Climate change and public participation in Manchester and Frankfurt. Local Environ 4(3):317–329CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dietz T, Dan A, Rachael S (2007) Support for climate change policy: social psychological and social structural influences. Rural Sociol 72(2):185–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dobles R (2008) Summary of the National Climate Change Strategy. Ministry of Environment and Energy, San Jose, Costa RicaGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunlap RE (1998) Lay perceptions of global risk: public views of global warming in cross-National context. Int Sociol 13(4):473–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Etkin D, Ho E (2007) Climate change: perceptions and discourses of risk. J Risk Res 10(5):623–641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fankhauser S, Smith JB, Tol RSJ (1999) Weathering climate change: some simple rules to guide adaptation decisions. Ecol Econ 30(1):67–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fletcher R (2010) When environmental issues collide: climate change and the shifting political ecology of hydroelectric power. Peace Conflict Rev 5(1):1–15Google Scholar
  27. GlobeScan (2007) All countries need to take major steps on climate change: Global Poll. Available at: http://www.globescan.com/news_archives/bbc_climate/; accessed March 2011.
  28. Inter-American Development Bank (IADB) (2010) Science, technology, and innovation in Latin America and the Caribbean: a statistical compendium of indicators. Science and Technology Division-IADB, Washington D.C, p 117Google Scholar
  29. Kasemir B, Dahinden U, Swartling AG, Schule R, Tabara D, Jaeger CC (2000) Citizens’ perspectives on climate change and energy Use. Global Environ Change 10:169–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kempton W (1991) Lay perspectives on global climate change. Global Environ Change 1(3):183–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kirby A (2004) Britons unsure of climate costs. BBC Public Opinion Poll. http://news.bbc.co.uk/nol/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/28_07_04_climatepoll.pdf. Accessed March 2011.
  32. Leiserowitz A (2003) Global warming in the American mind: The roles of affect, imagery, and worldviews in risk perception, policy preferences and behaviour. Unpublished Dissertation, University of Oregon, EugeneGoogle Scholar
  33. Leiserowitz A (2005) American risk perceptions: is climate change dangerous? Risk Anal 25(6):1433–1442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Leiserowitz A (2006) Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Change 77(1–2):45–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Leiserowitz A (2007) International public opinion, perception, and understanding of global climate change, Human Development Report 2007/2008. Fighting climate change: Human solidarity in a divided world. UNDP Human Development Report OfficeGoogle Scholar
  36. Löfstedt R (1991) Climate change perceptions and energy use decisions in northern Sweden. Global Environ Change 1(4):321–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lorenzoni I, Pidgeon NF (2006) Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Clim Change 77(1–2):73–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lorenzoni I, Leiserowitz A, DeFranca D, Poortinga W, Pidgeon NF (2006) Cross-national comparisons of image associations with “global warming” and “climate change” among laypeople in the United States of America and Great Britain. J Risk Res 9(3):265–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lorenzoni I, Nicholsoncole S, Whitmarsh L (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environ Change 17(3–4):445–459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lowe T, Brown K, Dessai S, Franca Doria M, Haynes K, Vincent K (2006) Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Publ Understand Sci 15(4):435–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Maddison D (2007) The perception of and adaptation to climate change in Africa. Policy Research Working Paper (No.WPS4308). The World Bank Development Research Group: Sustainable Rural and Urban Development Team.Google Scholar
  42. McDaniels TL, Axelrod L, Slovic P (1996) Perceived ecological risks of global change. Global Environ Change 6(2):159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McKenzie-Mohr D (2000) Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. Am Psychol 55(5):531–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ministerio de Ambiente, Energía y Telecomunicaciones (MINAET) (2009) Estrategia Nacional de Cambio Climatico. San Jose, Costa Rica: Government of Costa Rica.107 ppGoogle Scholar
  45. Ministerio de Planificación Nacional y Economia Política (MIDEPLAN) (2010) Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2011–2014. San Jose, Costa Rica, 256ppGoogle Scholar
  46. National Institute for Statistics and Censuses (NISC, 2002). Multiple Purposes Household Survey 2000. San jose, Costa Rica; consulted at: www.inec.go.cr/
  47. National Meteorological Institute (NMI) (2010) Second National Communication to the UNFCCC. San Jose, Costa Rica, 265 ppGoogle Scholar
  48. Nisbet MC, Myers T (2007) The polls trends: twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Publ Opin Q 71(3):444–470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Norgaard KM (2006) “We don’t really want to know” - Environmental justice and socially organized denial of global warming in Norway. Organ Environ 19(3):347–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Norton A, Leaman J (2004) The day after tomorrow: public opinion on climate change. MORI Social Research Institute.Google Scholar
  51. O’Connor RE, Bord RJ et al (1999) Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal 19(3):461–471Google Scholar
  52. Ohe M, Ikeda S (2005) Global warming: risk perception and risk mitigating behavior in Japan. Mitig Adapt Strategies Global Change 10:221–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Palutikof JP, Agnew MD, Hoar MR (2004) Public perceptions of unusually warm weather in the UK: impacts, responses and adaptations. Clim Res 26:43–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Patchen M (2010) What shapes public reactions to climate change? Overview of research and policy implications. Anal Soc Issues Public Policy 10(1):47–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Patt A, Schroter D (2008) Perceptions of climate risk in Mozambique: implications for the success of adaptation strategies. Global Environ Change 18(3):458–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Pew Research Centre (2009a) Modest support for “Cap and Trade” Policy. News Release. Washington D.C. Thursday October 22, 2009Google Scholar
  57. Pew Research Centre (2009b) Environment, immigration, health care slip down the list. News Release. Washington D.C. Thursday January 22, 2009Google Scholar
  58. Ponce LO (2006) Economic instruments in water management: the case of Costa Rica. Natural and Energy Resources, United Nations Economic Commission for Latin America (ECLAC), Mexico, p 59Google Scholar
  59. Poortinga W, Pidgeon N (2003) Public perceptions of risk, science and governance: Main findings of a British survey of five risk cases. Centre for Environmental Risk, University of East AngliaGoogle Scholar
  60. Read D, Bostrom A, Morgan MG, Fischhoff B, Smuts T (1994) What do people know about global climate-change. 2. Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Anal 14(6):971–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Reynolds TW, Bostrom A, Read D, Morgan MG (2010) Now what do people know about global climate change? Survey studies of educated laypeople. Risk Anal 30(10):1520–1538CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sandvik H (2008) Public concern over global warming correlates negatively with national wealth. Clim Change 90(3):333–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Semenza JC, Hall DE, Wilson DJ, Bontempo BD, Sailor DJ, George LA (2008) Public perception of climate change: voluntary mitigation and barriers to behaviour change. Am J Prev Med 35(5):479–487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shwom R, Bidwell D, Dan A, Dietz T (2010) Understanding U.S. public support for domestic climate change policies. Global Environ Change 20(3):472–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. SPSS Inc (2010) SPSS Base 19.0 for windows. SPSS Inc, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  66. Stern PC (2000) New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. J Soc Issues 56(3):407–424CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stoll-Kleeman S, O’Riordan T, Jaeger CG (2001) The psychology of denial concerning climate mitigation measures: evidence from Swiss focus groups. Global Environ Change 11:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sundblad E, Biel A, Gärling T (2009) Knowledge and confidence in knowledge about climate change among experts, journalists, politicians, and laypersons. Environ Behav 41:281–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Takahashi B (2010) Framing and sources: a study of mass media coverage of climate change in Peru during the V ALCUE. Publ Understand Sci 20(4):543–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Takahashi B, Meisner M (2011) Comparing influences on Peruvian Climate Change Policy: information, knowledge, and concern among political elites. J Intercult Comm Res 40(3):181–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Trumbo C (1996) Constructing climate change: claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Publ Understand Sci 5(3):269–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tucker CM, Eakin H, Castellanos EJ (2010) Perceptions of risk and adaptation: Coffee producers, market shocks, and extreme weather in Central America and Mexico. Global Environ Change 20(1):23–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2005) Submission from Papua New Guinea and Costa Rica: Reducing Emissions from Deforestation in Developing Countries: Approaches to Stimulate Action (No. FCCC/CP/2005/MISC.1).Google Scholar
  74. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) (2009) Copenhagen accord appendix II: Nationally appropriate mitigation actions of Developing Country Parties. Copenhagen, DenmarkGoogle Scholar
  75. Valdivia C, Seth A, Gilles JL, García M, Jiménez E, Cusicanqui J, Navia F, Yucra E (2010) Adapting to climate change in Andean ecosystems: Landscapes, capitals, and perceptions shaping rural livelihood strategies and linking knowledge systems. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100(4):818–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wilson C, Dowlatabadi H (2007) Models of decision making and residential energy use. Annu Rev Environ Resour 32(1):169–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yearley S (2000) Making systematic sense of public discontents with expert knowledge: Two analytical approaches and a case study. Publ Understand Sci 9:105–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zahran S, Brody S, Grover H, Vedlitz A (2006) Climate change vulnerability and policy support. Soc Nat Resour 19(9):771–789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zwick M, Renn O (2002) Perception and evaluation of risks findings of the Baden-Württemberg risk survey 2001 (No. 203)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Vignola
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Klinsky
    • 2
    • 4
  • J. Tam
    • 2
  • T. McDaniels
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Climate Change, Ecosystem Services and Land Use Policy Research, Climate Change Program, CATIETurrialbaCosta Rica
  2. 2.Institute for Resources, Environment and SustainabilityUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.School of Community and Regional PlanningUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  4. 4.Cambridge Centre for Climate Change Mitigation ResearchUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations