Advertisement

Assessment of trophic change and its probable impact on tropical estuarine environment (the Kodungallur-Azhikode estuary, India)

  • P. R. Jayachandran
  • S. Bijoy Nandan
Original Article

Abstract

The cumulative effects of global change, including climate change, increased population density and domestic waste disposal, effluent discharges from industrial processes, agriculture and aquaculture will likely continue and increases the process of eutrophication in estuarine environments. Eutrophication is one of the leading causes of degraded water quality, water column hypoxia/anoxia, harmful algal bloom (HAB) and loss of habitat and species diversity in the estuarine environment. The present study attempts to characterize the trophic condition of coastal estuary using a simple tool; trophic index (TRIX) based on a linear combination of the log of four state variables with supplementary index Efficiency Coefficient (Eff. Coeff.) as a discriminating tool. Numerically, the index TRIX is scaled from 0 to10, covering a wide range of trophic conditions from oligotrophic to eutrophic. Study area Kodungallur-Azhikode Estuary (KAE) was comparatively shallow in nature with average depth of 3.6 ± 0.2 m. Dissolve oxygen regime in the water column was ranged from 4.7 ± 1.3 mgL−1 in Station I to 5.9 ± 1.4 mgL−1 in Station IV. The average nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) of KAE water was 470 mg m−3; values ranged from Av. 364.4 mg m−3 at Station II to Av. 626.6 mg m−3at Station VII. The mean ammonium-nitrogen (NH 4 + -N) varied from 54.1 mg m−3 at Station VII to 101 mg m−3 at Station III. The average Chl-a for the seven stations of KAE was 6.42 ± 3.91 mg m−3. Comparisons over different spatial and temporal scales in the KAE and study observed that, estuary experiencing high productivity by the influence of high degree of eutrophication; an annual average of 6.91 TRIX was noticed in the KAE and seasonal highest was observed during pre monsoon period (7.15) and lowest during post monsoon period (6.51). In the spatial scale station V showed high value 7.37 and comparatively low values in the station VI (6.93) and station VII (6.96) and which indicates eutrophication was predominant in land cover area with comparatively high water residence time. Eff. Coeff. values in the KAE ranges from −2.74 during monsoon period to the lowest of −1.98 in pre monsoon period. Present study revealed that trophic state of the estuary under severe stress and the restriction of autochthonous and allochthonous nutrient loading should be keystone in mitigate from eutrophication process.

Keywords

TRIX Efficiency coefficient Eutrophication Kodungallur-Azhikode Estuary Estuarine monitoring Global change 

Notes

Acknowledgement

This work forms part of the research project entitled “Ecology and fish production potential of the Kodungallur-Azhikode back water ecosystem” funded by the Kerala State Council for Science,Technology and Environment (KSCSTE) and the authors are thankful for financial assistance. Authors are also thankful to Head and Ecology Division, Dept. of Marine Biology, Microbiology and Biochemistry, Cochin University of Science and Technology for providing necessary facilities.

References

  1. APHA (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and waste water. Am Publ Health Assoc 21:1(1)–10(167)Google Scholar
  2. Bijoy Nandan S (2008) Current status and biodiversity modification in the coastal wetland ecosystems of India with objectives for its sustainable management. Proceedings of conserve-vision conference, The University of Waikato, www.waikato.ac.n/wtass/conserve-vision
  3. Doig MT, Martin DF (1974) The effect of naturally occurring organic substances on the growth of a red tide organism. Water Res 8:601–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ECOHAB (1995) The ecology and oceanography of harmful algal blooms. A National Research Agenda. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods HoleGoogle Scholar
  5. GOI (2011) Census of India-2011, available from http://censusindia.gov.in/
  6. Grasshoff K, Ehrhardt M, Kremling K (1983) Methods of sea water analysis. Verlag Chemie, Weinheim, pp 9–224Google Scholar
  7. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2007) In: Parry MI, Canziani OF, Patulikof JP, PA Van derLinden, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007-impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 976Google Scholar
  8. James LP, Hans WP, Patricia T, Tammi LR (2001) The role of nutrient loading and eutrophication in estuarine ecology. Environ Health Perspect 109(5):699–706CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Jaworski NA, Howarth RW, Hetling LJ (1997) Atmospheric deposition of nitrogen oxides onto the landscape contributes to coastal eutrophication in the northeast United States. Environ Sci Technol 31:1995–2004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Jesper HA, Louise S, Gunni A (2006) Coastal eutrophication: recent developments in definitions and implications for monitoring strategies. J Plankton Res 28(7):621–628CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jia-Zhong Z, Charles JF (2005) A simplified resorcinol method for direct spectrophotometric determination of nitrate in seawater. Mar Chem 99:220–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Jørgensen SE, Constanza R, Xu FL (eds) (2005) Handbook of ecological indicators for assessment of ecosystem health. CRC, Boca Raton, p 439Google Scholar
  13. Killops SD, Killops VJ (1993) An introduction to organic geochemistry. Longman Group, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Malone T, Conley DA, Fisher T, Glibert P, Harding L, Sellner K (1996) Scales of nutrient limited phytoplankton productivity in Chesapeake Bay. Estuaries 19:371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. McClelland JW, Valiela I (1998) Changes in food web structure under the influence of increased anthropogenic nitrogen inputs to estuaries. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 168:259–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McLusky SD, Elliott M (2004) The estuarine: ecosystem ecology, threats, and management, Great Clarendon Street, Oxford OX26DP, pp214Google Scholar
  17. Michael JK (2002) Environmental threats and environmental future of estuaries. Environ Conserv 29(1):78–107Google Scholar
  18. Nancy NR, Eugene RT, Robert JD, Dubravko J (2009) Global change and eutrophication of coastal waters. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Oxf J. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsp0471528-1537
  19. National Research Council (NRC) (1993) Sustaining our water resources. National Academy, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  20. Philip GT, Alan RT (2010) Stoichiometric control of organic carbon nitrate relationships from soils to the sea. Nature 464:22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Revichandran C, Abraham P (1998) Mixing and flushing in the Azhikode estuary, south west coat of India. Indian J Mar Sci 27:163–166Google Scholar
  22. Richard JTK, Robert JN, Nobuo M (1999) Coastal adaptation to climate change: can the IPCC technical guidelines be applied? Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 4:239–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith RV, Lennox SD, Jordan C, Foy RH, McHale E (1995) Increase in soluble phosphorus transported in drain flow from a grassland catchment in response to soil phosphorus accumulation. Soil Use Manag 11:204–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Smith RA, Schwarz GE, Alexander RB (1997) Regional interpretation of water quality monitoring data. Water Resour Res 33:2781–2798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Smith VH, Tilman GD, Nekola JC (1999) Eutrophication: impact of excess nutrients inputs on fresh water, marine, and terrestrial ecosystems. Environ Pollut 100:179–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Strickland JDH, Parsons TR (1972) Bulletin of fisheries research board of Canada. 167–310Google Scholar
  27. Vincent WF (1987) Dominance of bloom forming cyanobacteria (bluegreenalgae). N Z J Mar Freshw Res 21:361–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vollenweider RA, Kerekes JJ (1982) Eutrophication of waters, monitoring assessment and control. O.E.C.D, Paris, p 154Google Scholar
  29. Vollenweider RA, Rinaldi A, Montanari G (1992) Eutrophication, structure and dynamics of a marine coastal system: results of a 10 years monitoring along the Emilia Romagna coast (Northwest Adriatic Sea). In: Vollenweider RA, Marchett R, Viviani R (eds) Marine coastal eutrophication. Elsevier, London, pp 63–106Google Scholar
  30. Vollenweider RA, Giovanardi F, Montanari G, Rinaldi A (1998) Characterization of the trophic conditions of marine coastal waters, with special reference to the NWAdriatic Sea: proposal for a trophic scale, turbidity and generalized water quality index. Environmetrics 9:329–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Waring RH, Running SW (1998) Forest ecosystems: analysis at multiple scales, 2nd edn. Academic, San DiegoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marine Biology, Microbiology & Biochemistry, School of Marine SciencesCochin University of Science and TechnologyKochiIndia

Personalised recommendations