Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Co-benefits of a carbon tax in Nepal

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the co-benefits of introducing a time variant carbon (C) tax scheme in Nepal, a hydropower resourceful country, by using a bottom up integrated energy system model based on the MARKet ALlocation (MARKAL) framework with time horizon of 2005–2050. It discusses the effects of C tax on energy mix, environmental emissions, energy supply security, energy efficiency, energy system cost, and employment benefit. The study shows that the C tax (that gradually increases from US$ 13/tCO2e in 2015 to US$ 200/tCO2e by 2050) results in a reduction of the cumulative emission of greenhouse gases by 83.9 million tons CO2e (12%) as compared to that in the base case. With the introduction of the C tax, there would be a need for additional hydropower capacity of 945 MW by 2050 as compared to the capacity in the base case. The emission of local pollutants consisting of sulphur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen oxides (NOx) and non-methane volatile organic compound (NMVOC) in 2050 would be reduced by 12%, 7% and 1% respectively under the C tax scenario. Total amount of imported energy would decrease by 13%, which corresponds to a reduction in discounted net fuel import cost by 5% during the study period. Furthermore, the C tax would result in new employment generation of 151 thousand man-years associated with the additional hydropower capacity requirement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ADB/ICIMOD (Asian Development Bank/ International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development) (2006) Environment Assessment of Nepal, Emerging Issues and Challenges

  • ADB (Asian Development Bank) (2010) Asian Development Bank—Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2010, 41st edn. Manila

  • AEPC (Alternative Energy Promotion Centre) (2009) Energy Sector Assistance Programme (ESAP) II. GoN, Kathmandu, http://www.aepc.go.np. Cited 14 March 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • APERC (Asia Pacific Energy Research Centre) (2007) A Quest for Energy Security in the 21st Century. Resources and Constraints, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatta SD, Joshi DR (2004) Are electric vehicles viable in Kathmandu? A cost-benefit perspective. Prepared for Kathmandu Electric Vehicle Alliance Secretariat under USAID/Nepal

  • Bose RK, Shukla M (1999) Elasticities of Electricity Demand in India. Energy Policy 27(3):137–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) (2003a) Population Monograph 2003. GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) (2003b) Population Projections for Nepal 2001–2021. GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) (2008) Census of Manufacturing Establishments 2006/07, National Level. GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal S (2006) Urban transportation and the Environment in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES), Hayama

  • Eaves S, Eaves J (2004) A cost comparison of fuel-cell and battery electric vehicles. J Power Sources 130:208–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EEA (European Environment Agency) (2009) EMEP/EEA air pollutant emission inventory guidebook—2009, Technical report No 6/2009 (Tier 1 default emission factors). Copenhagen

  • EIA (Energy Information Administration) (2009a) International Energy Outlook 2009. Washington DC

  • EIA (Energy Information Administration) (2009b) Annual Energy Outlook 2009. With Projections to 2030. Washington DC

  • EMEP/CORINAIR (2007) EMEP/CORINAIR Emission Inventory Guidebook—2007. European Environment Agency (EEA), Copenhagen

  • Endo E (2007) Market penetration analysis of fuel cell vehicles in Japan by using the energy system model MARKAL. Int J Hydro Energy 32:1347–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IEA (International Energy Agency) (2008) Energy Technology Perspectives 2008: Scenarios and Strategies to 2050. Paris

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2006) 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/ public/2006gl/index.html. Cited 18 Dec 2009

  • IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change) (2007) Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Cambridge University Press

  • EREC/GREENPEACE (European Renewable Energy Council. European Renewable Energy Council/ GREENPEACE) (2007) Energy Revolution: A Sustainable Global Energy Outlook. http://www.energyblueprint.info/fileadmin/media/documents/energy_revolution.pdf. Cited 24 Jan 2009

  • ETSAP (2010) Models and Applications: Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme. http://www.estap.org. Cited 12 June 2010

  • FOSTCA (Federal Office for Scientific, Technical and Cultural Affairs) (2001) The Belgian MARKAL Database. Brussel

  • Gyawali D, Dixit A, Upadhya M (2004) Ropeways in Nepal. Nepal Water Conservation Foundation (NWCS), Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • IIM (Indian Institute of Management) (2009) Low Carbon Society Vision 2050, India

  • JBIC (Japan Bank for International Cooperation) (2004) Sector Study for Power Sector in the Kingdom of Nepal, Final Report. Tokyo

  • Jegarl S, Baek J, Jang D, Ryu C (2009) Impact assessment of CO2 mitigation options in Korea using energy system analysis model. In: Braitsch J, Gale J, Herzog H (eds) Energy Procedia 1:3747–3754

  • Jha DK, Yorino N, Zoka Y (2007) A Modified DEA Model for Benchmarking of Hydropower Plants. Power Tech 2007 IEEE Lausanne:1374–1379. doi:10.1109/PCT.2007.4538516

  • Kantipur (2010) Green Bus in Capital Road, Kantipur Publication Pvt. Ltd. http://www.ekantipur.com/np/2067/4/3/full-news/314868. Cited 19 July 2010

  • Karki S, Mann MD, Salehfar H (2007) Substitution and Price Effects of carbon Tax on CO2 Emissions Reduction from Distributed Energy Sources. Paper presented at Power Systems Conference: Advanced Metering, Protection, Control, Communication, and Distributed Resources, Clemson University, South Carolina, 14–17 March 2006. doi:10.1109/PSAMP.2006.285394

  • Kruyt B, Vuuren DP, de Vries HJM, Groenenberg H (2009) Indicators for energy security. Energy Policy 37:2166–2181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kypreos S, Regemorter DV, Guel T (2006) Key Drivers for Energy Trends in EU; Specification of the Baseline and Policy Scenarios. Working paper RS2, WP2.3, New Energy Externalities Developments for Sustainability (NEEDS) Integrated Project

  • Levin T, Thomas VM, Lee AJ (2011) State-scale evaluation of renewable electricity policy: The role of renewable electricity credits and carbon taxes. Energy Policy 39:950–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limmeechokchai B, Hieu ND (2003) Integrated Resource Planning with Carbon Tax: Effects on Power Generation Expansion Planning in Vietnam. Thammasat International Journal of Science and Technology 8(2):55–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Loulou R, Goldstein G, Noble K (2004) Documentation for the MARKAL Family of Models. Energy Technology Systems Analysis Programme. http://www.etsap.org/MrklDoc-I_StdMARKAL.pdf. Cited 4 June 2008

  • Martinsen D, Linssen J, Markewitz P, Vogele S (2007) CCS: A future CO2 mitigation option for Germany?-A bottom-up approach. Energy Policy 35:2110–2120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathur J, Bansal NK, Wagner HJ (2003) Investigation of greenhouse gas reduction potential and change in technological selection in Indian power sector. Energy Policy 31:1235–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOE (Ministry of Energy) (2010) Twenty-Year Hydropower Development Plan 2010–2030, 20-Year Hydropower Development Plan Implementation Task Force. GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • MOEV (Ministry of Environment) (2010) Climate Change Policy 2010. GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • MOF (Ministry of Finance) (2009) Economic Survey Fiscal Year 2008/09. GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • MOI (Ministry of Industry) (2010) Industrial Policy 2010 (2067). GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrow K, Karner D, Francfort J (2008) Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure Review, Final Report. Battelle Energy Alliance Contract No. 58517, Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy

  • MOWR (Ministry of Water Resource) (2009) Ten 10-Year Hydropower Development Plan 2010–2020, Part 1: Main Report, 10 Year Hydropower Development Plan Implementation Task Force. GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakata T, Lamont A (2001) Analysis of the impacts of carbon taxes on energy systems in Japan. Energy Policy 29:159–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NEA (Nepal Electricity Authority) (2005) Corporate Development Plan FY2004/05-2008/09. Kathmandu

  • NEA (Nepal Electricity Authority) (2008a) Nepal Electricity Authority Fiscal Year 2007/08-AYear in Review. Kathmandu

  • NEA (Nepal Electricity Authority) (2008b) Nepal Electricity Authority Generation 6th Issue. Kathmandu

  • NESS (National Environmental and Scientific Services) (2003) Analysis of HMG Policies and Regulations affecting Electric Vehicles, Final Report. Kathmandu

  • Nexant SARI/Energy (2002) Regional Hydro-power Resources: Status of Development and Barriers, Prepared for USAID-SARI/Energy Program

  • Nguyen QK (2005) Long term optimization of energy supply and demand in Vietnam with special reference to the potential of renewable energy. Dissertation, University of Oldenburg, Germany

  • NIES (National Institute for Environmental Studies) (2007) Aligning Climate Change and Sustainability—Scenarios, Modeling and Policy Analysis, Asia Pacific Integrated Modeling Team. Center for Global Environment Research, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • PREGA (Promotion of Renewable Energy, Energy Efficiency and GHG Abatement in Nepal) (2006) Sisdol Landfill Gas to Energy Project- A CDM Project Design Document. Winrock International Nepal, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai S, Koirala D (2006) Prospects of Jatropa Biodiesel in Nepal. In: Shrestha JN, Bajracharya TR, Pradhan S (eds) Proceedings of the First National Conference on Renewable Energy Technology for Rural Development (RETRUD-06). Centre for Energy Study, Kathmandu, pp 153–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MS, Venkataraman C (2002a) Inventory of aerosol and sulphur dioxide emissions from India: I—Fossil fuel combustion. Atmos Environ 36:677–697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy MS, Venkataraman C (2002b) Inventory of aerosol and sulphur dioxide emissions from India: II—Biomass combustion. Atmos Environ 36:699–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RITES/SILT (RITES Ltd. and SILT Consultants) (2010) Feasibility Study of Mechi-Mahakali and Pokhara-Kathmandu Electric Railway. Submitted to Ministry of Physical Planning and Works, GoN, Kathmandu

  • Santisirisomboon J, Limmeechokchai B, Chungpaibulpatana S (2001) Impacts of biomass power generation and CO2 taxation on electricity generation expansion planning and environmental emissions. Energy Policy 29(12):975–985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt J, Leduc S, Dotzauer E, Schmid E (2011) Cost-effective policy instruments for greenhouse gas emission reduction and fossil fuel substitution through bioenergy production in Austria. Energy Policy (2011), doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2011.03.018

  • Shiwakoti RG (2006) Pricing of Electricity for Generation in Nepal. Tribhuvan University, Kathmandu, Master Thesis

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha RM, Marpaung COP (1999) Supply-and demand-side effects of carbon tax in the Indonesian power sector: an integrated resources planning analysis. Energy Policy 27(4):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha RM, Rajbhandari S (2010) Energy and environmental implications of carbon emission reduction targets: Case of Kathmandu Valley, Nepal. Energy Policy 38(9):4818–4827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha RM, Shrestha R, Bhattacharya SC (1998) Environmental and electricity planning implications of carbon tax and technological constraints in a developing country. Energy Policy 26(7):527–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha RM, Pradhan S, Liyanage MR (2008) Effects of Carbon Tax on Greenhouse Gas Mitigation in Thailand. Climate Policy 8(Supplement 1):140–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla PR, Dhar S, Mahapatra D (2008) Low-carbon society scenarios for India. Climate Policy 8(Supplement 1):156–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith KR, Uma R, Kishore VVN, Lata K, Joshi V, Zhang J, Rasmussen RA, Khalil MAK (2000) Greenhouse Gases from Small-Scale Combustion Devices in Developing Countries: Phase IIa Household Stoves in India. Prepared for USEPA, Washington, DC

  • TERI (The Energy and Resources Institute) (2006) National Energy Map for India: Technology Vision 2030. TERI Press, Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • UNPD (United Nations Population Division) (2009) World Population Prospects: The 2008 Revision. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency) (2006) MARKAL Scenario Analyses of Technology Options for the Electric Sector: The Impact on Air Quality. Washington DC

  • WECS (Water and Energy Commission Secretariat) (1995) Energy Resources Base of Nepal, Perspective Energy Plan Supporting Document No.2. GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • WECS (Water and Energy Commission Secretariat) (1999) Detailed Energy Consumption Survey in The Commercial Sector of Nepal. GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • WECS (Water and Energy Commission Secretariat) (2000) Detailed Energy Consumption Survey in Transport Sector of Nepal, Volume 2 (Annexes). GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • WECS (Water and Energy Commission Secretariat) (2001) Agriculture Sector Energy Consumption in Nepal. GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • WECS (Water and Energy Commission Secretariat) (2005a) National Water Plan 2005. GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • WECS (Water and Energy Commission Secretariat) (2005b) Detailed Energy Consumption Survey in Urban Residential Sector of Nepal. GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • WECS (Water and Energy Commission Secretariat) (2006a) Energy Synopsis Report 2006. GoN, Kathmandu

  • WECS (Water and Energy Commission Secretariat) (2006b) Energy Usage Pattern in the Industrial Sector of Central Development Region. GoN, Kathmandu

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2003) Project Appraisal Document for a Nepal Power Development Project, April, 2003. Washington, DC

  • Zonooz MRF, Nopiah ZM, Yusof A, Sopian K (2009) A Review of MARKAL. Energy Modeling 26(3):352–361

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Energy Field of Study, School of Environment, Resources and Development, Asian Institute of Technology, P.O. Box 4, Klong Luang, Pathumthani, 12120, Thailand

    Shree Raj Shakya, S. Kumar & Ram M. Shrestha

Authors
  1. Shree Raj Shakya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ram M. Shrestha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Kumar.

Appendices

Appendix A

Table 9 Sectoral end-use services
Full size table

Appendix B

Table 10 End use services and elasticities for service demand drivers used in the study
Full size table

Appendix C

Table 11 Energy Resource potential of Nepal
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shakya, S.R., Kumar, S. & Shrestha, R.M. Co-benefits of a carbon tax in Nepal. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 17, 77–101 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9310-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9310-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation