Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessing impact of projected future climate on tree species growth and yield: development of an evaluation strategy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Quantifying the impact of climate change on forest tree species growth and yield is required by all forest planners. Forest planners, who know which tree species have the growth characteristics to compete in a future climate, will be better able to design stand prescriptions tailored to promote these species. A method to acquire this understanding has been developed by implementing a forest gap model to predict ecological succession of Acadian Forest tree species over an 80-year time horizon for two climate scenarios (2010–2090), i.e., a current climate with average temperature and precipitation from the 1971–2000 normal period, and a future climate with time-varying temperature and precipitation projected with the Canadian Coupled Global Climate Model (CCGCM3), assuming an A2 emission scenario (Nakicenovic et al. 2000, IPCC Special report on emission scenarios). From these two simulations, time-dependent stand-yield multipliers are developed for individual tree species by calculating the proportional difference between the two scenarios. In principle, these multipliers can then be used to update inventory-based growth and yield curves to assess the impact of future climate on existing forest tree species and future regional wood supply characteristics. Results from this work indicate that for a CCGCM3-projected warmer climate pine (Pinus spp.), red maple (Acer rubra), American beech (Fagus grandifolia), yellow birch (Betula alleghaniensis), and white ash (Fraxinus americana) are likely to respond positively, whereas cold-hardy species such as white and black spruce (Picea spp.), balsam fir (Abies balasmea), larch (Larix laricina), and white birch (Betula papyrifera) are projected to respond negatively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  • Barrow E, Maxwell B, Gachon P (eds) (2004) Climate variability and change in Canada: past, present and future, ACSD Science Assessment Series No. 2, Meteorological Service of Canada. Environment Canada, Toronto, ON, p 114

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaton K, Demerchant I, Henderson J, KillPatrick B, MacKinnon W (2006) Acadia research forest strategy/tactical management plan. Canadian Forest Service, Atlantic Forestry Centre, Fredericton, NB

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourque CPA, Hassan QK, Swift DE (2008) Modelled potential species distribution for current and projected future climates for the Acadian Forest region of Nova Scotia, Canada. Report prepared for the Nova Scotia Department of Natural Resources, Truro, Nova Scotia, http://www.gov.ns.ca/natr/forestry/reports/Final-Report-for-NS-Cliamte-Change-Project.pdf, p 46. Cited 28 January 2010

  • Environment Canada (2010) Canadian climate change scenarios. http://www.cccsn.ca/index-e.html. Cited 28 January 2010

  • Gunderson L, Holling C, Pritchard L Jr, Peterson G (2002) Resilience of large-scale resource systems. In: Gunderson L, Pritchard L Jr (eds) SCOPE 60 Resilience and behaviour of large-scale systems. Island Press, Washington, USA, pp 3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling C (1996) Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze PC (ed) Engineering with ecological constraints. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA, pp 31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Husch B, Beers T, Kershaw J (2003) Forest Menstruation. Hoboken, John Wiley & Sons, p 443

    Google Scholar 

  • Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC (2007) Summary for Policymakers. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of working Group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen K, Samuelson L, Teskey R, McNulty S, Fox T (2001) Process models as tools in forestry research and management. Forest Sci 47:2–8

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane NA, Boer GJ, Blanchet J-P, Lazare M (1992) The Canadian climate centre second-generation general circulation model and its equilibrium climate. J Climate 5:1013–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane NA, Scinocca JF, Lazare M, Harvey R, Verseghy D, Li J (2005) The CCCma third generation atmospheric general circulation model, Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis (CCCma) Internal Rep. http://www.cccma.ec.gc.ca/models/gcm3.shtml, p 25. Cited 28 January 2010

  • Marland G, Boden T, Andres R (2008) Global, regional, and national CO2 emissions. In trends: a compendium of data on global change. Carbon dioxide information analysis center, Oak Ridge national laboratory, US Department of energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., USA

  • McKay D, Morris R, (1985) Solar radiation data analyses for Canada 1967–1976. Volume 1: The Atlantic Provinces. Environment Canada, Atmospheric environment service, Minister of Supply and Services Canada.

  • McKenney D, Pedlar J, Iverson L, Hutchinson M, Lawrence K, Campbell K (2007) Potential impacts of climate change on the distribution of North American trees. Biosci 57(11):939–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan JE, Cox R, Iverson L (2009) Northeastern forest compositions and productivity in a future, warmer world. Can J Forest Res 39:213–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A, Jung TY, Kram T, La Rovere EL, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Raihi K, Roehrl A, Rogner H-H, Sankovski A, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, van Rooijen S, Victor N, Dadi Z (2000) Emissions scenarios. A special report of working Group III of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. UK and New York, NY, USA, p 599

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitschke C, Innes J (2008) A tree and climate assessment tool for modelling ecosystem response to climate change. Ecol Model 210(3):263–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter K, MacLean D, Beaton K, Upshall J (2001) New Brunswick permanent sample plot database (PSPDB v1.0): user’s guide and analysis. Forest management branch, NB department of natural resources and energy, p 65

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips BE, Laroque CP (2009) Reducing uncertainty: Acadian Forest radial growth forecasting at a multi–level scope. Mount Allison dendrochronology laboratory, Mount Allison University, Report 2009–03, http://fundymodelforest.net/cms/publications_science_and_innovation , p 30. Cited 28 January 2010

  • Raupach M, Marland G, Ciais P, LeQuéré C, Canadell J, Klepper G, Field C (2007) Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2 emissions. PNAS 104(24):10288–10293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson D (1996) GIZELA: Model description : User’s guide and tutorial. ESSA Technologies Ltd.

  • Scinocca JF, McFarlane NA, Lazare M, Li J, Plummer D (2008) Technical note: the CCCma third generation AGCM and its extension into the middle atmosphere. Atmos Chem Phys 8:7055–7074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith M (1998) An examination of forest succession in the Cape Breton highlands of Nova Scotia. MScF Thesis. University of New Brunswick, Fredericton

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolbrod A, Peterson D (1999) Response of high-elevation forests in the Olympic Mountains to climatic change. Can J For Res 29:1966–1978

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazny V, Martin G, Toner M, Gorman M, Clayden S, Colpitts M, Veen H, Godin B, McInnis B, Steeves C, Wuest L, Roberts M (2007) Our landscape heritage: the story of ecological land classification in New Brunswick. Department of Natural Resources, NB, Fredericton, p 359

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support from Environment Canada, the Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), and the University of New Brunswick (UNB) are gratefully acknowledged. Financial support from NSERC was given in the form of a Discovery Grant to CPAB. We would also like to thank the other members of the UNB FOR 4020 Forest Management Practicum Course (2008–2009) who provided assistance with the research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles P.-A. Bourque.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dombroskie, S., McKendy, M., Ruelland, C. et al. Assessing impact of projected future climate on tree species growth and yield: development of an evaluation strategy. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 15, 307–320 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9218-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-010-9218-1

Keywords