An integrated climate change assessment for the Northeast United States

  • Peter C. FrumhoffEmail author
  • James J. McCarthy
  • Jerry M. Melillo
  • Susanne C. Moser
  • Donald J. Wuebbles
  • Cameron Wake
  • Erika Spanger-Siegfried
Original Article


The papers in this Special Issue are the primary technical underpinnings for the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment (NECIA), an integrated regional-scale assessment of projected climate change, impacts and options for mitigation and adaptation across the US Northeast. The consequences of future pathways of greenhouse gas emissions on projected climate and impacts across climate-sensitive sectors is assessed by using downscaled projections from three global climate models under both higher (Alfi) and lower (B1) emissions scenarios. The findings illustrate that near-term reductions in emissions can greatly reduce the extent and severity of regionally important impacts on natural and managed ecosystems and public health in the latter half of this century, and increase the feasibility that those impacts which are now unavoidable can be successfully managed through adaptation.


Climate change Assessment Northeast climate impacts assessment 


  1. ACIA (2005) Arctic climate impact assessment. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK 1042 pp. Online at
  2. Cayan D, Luers A, Hanemann M, Franco G, Croes B (2006) Scenarios of climate change in california: an overview. CEC-500-2005-186-SF, Report from California Climate Change Center. Online at Scholar
  3. Christensen JH, Hewitson B, Busuioc A, Chen A, Gao X, Held I, Jones R Kolli RK, Kwon W-T, Laprise R, Magaña Rueda V, Mearns L, Menéndez CG, Räisänen J, Rinke A, Sarr A, Whetton P (2007) Regional climate projections. In: Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tignor M, Miller HL (eds) Climate Change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  4. Dowdesdell J (2006) Greenland ice sheet and global sea-level rise. Science 311:963–964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frumhoff PC, McCarthy JJ, Melillo JM, Moser SC, Wuebbles DJ (2007) Confronting climate change in the U.S. Northeast: science, impacts, and solutions. Synthesis report of the Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment (NECIA). Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  6. Hayhoe K, Cayan D, Field CB, Frumhoff PC, Maurer EP, Miller NL, Moser SC, Schneider SH, Cahill KN, Cleland EE (2004) Emissions pathways, climate change, and impacts on California. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101:12422–12578CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hayhoe K, Wake CP, Huntington TG, Luo L, Schwartz MD, Sheffield J, Wood E, Anderson B, Bradbury J, DeGaetano A, Troy TJ, Wolfe D (2007) Past and future changes in climate and hydrological indicators in the U.S. Northeast. Climate Dynamics 28(4):381–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: mitigation. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK Online at
  9. Luers AL, Frumhoff PC, Hayhoe K, Mastrandrea MD (2007) How to avoid dangerous climate change: a target for U.S. emissions reductions. Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  10. Meinshausen M (2006) What does a 2°C target mean for greenhouse gas concentrations? A brief analysis based on multi-gas emission pathways and several climate sensitivity uncertainty estimates. In: Schellnhuber H-J, Cramer W, Nakicenovic N, Yohe GW, Wigley TB (eds) Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  11. Moser S, Dilling L (eds) (2007) Creating a climate for change: communicating climate change and facilitating social change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 512 pp.Google Scholar
  12. Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A, Jung TY, Kram T, La Rovere EL, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Riahi K, Roehrl A, Rogner H-H, Sankovski A, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, van Rooijen S, Victor N, Dadi Z (2000) Special report on emissions scenarios. An Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Report (IPCC). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. National Assessment Synthesis Team (2001) Climate change impacts on the United States: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. report for the US global change research program. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 620 pp.Google Scholar
  14. Northeast Climate Impacts Assessment (NECIA) (2006) Climate change in the U.S. Northeast. A report of the Northeast climate impacts assessment. Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS), Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  15. Rignot E, Kanagaratnam P (2006) Changes in the velocity structure of the Greenland Ice Sheet. Science 311:986–990CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter C. Frumhoff
    • 1
    Email author
  • James J. McCarthy
    • 2
  • Jerry M. Melillo
    • 3
  • Susanne C. Moser
    • 4
  • Donald J. Wuebbles
    • 5
  • Cameron Wake
    • 6
  • Erika Spanger-Siegfried
    • 1
  1. 1.Union of Concerned ScientistsCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Museum of Comparative ZoologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUSA
  3. 3.The Ecosystems CenterMarine Biological LaboratoryWoods HoleUSA
  4. 4.Institute for the Study of Society and EnvironmentNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderUSA
  5. 5.Department of Atmospheric SciencesUniversity of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignUrbanaUSA
  6. 6.Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans, and SpaceUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations