Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Institutional dynamics and climate change adaptation in South Africa

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Climate change is a multi-dimensional issue and in terms of adaptation numerous state and non-state actors are involved from global to national and local scales. The aim of this paper is first to analyse specific institutional networks involved in climate change predominantly at the national level in South Africa and second to determine how different stakeholders perceive their role vis-a-vis climate change adaptation. Within the South African context there is a gap in understanding and evaluating how institutional networks operate and thus the findings of this work may help inform and strengthen such relationships in the future. Results showed that few institutions fully understand the implications of adaptation and their roles and responsibilities have not yet been properly defined. Constraints relating to capacity, lack of awareness and poor information flow need to be addressed. Climate change is perceived as an important issue although problems such as poverty reduction and job creation remain national priorities. Most importantly this research has demonstrated how adaptation challenges the hierarchical manner in which government works and a more collaborative approach to climate change adaptation is needed. Adaptation needs to be mainstreamed and institutional networks need to be strengthened in order for adaptation mechanisms to be effectively implemented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In accordance with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Articles 4 and 12, South Africa has to submit National Communications to the Convention incorporating a national inventory of greenhouse gas emissions; a description of envisaged steps to implement the Convention and any other information considered relevant by the party (UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Booklet 2002).

  2. Minmec is a political structure which facilitates inter-tier communications and is the interface between the Minister and the Provincial members of the Executive Councils (from the National Climate Change Response Strategy for South Africa, 2004).

  3. Mintech is a non-political structure serving as a technical committee that advises Minmec. It comprises of the Director-General and the relevant provincial department heads (from the National Climate Change Response Strategy for South Africa, 2004).

  4. Quote by the Chief Director of the Climate Change Directorate, DEAT (2005).

References

  • Adger WN, Vincent K (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. C R Geosci 337:399–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Huq S, Brown K, Conway D, Hulme M (2003) Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Prog Dev Stud 3:179–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beg N, Morlot JC, Davidson O, Afrane-Okesse Y, Tyani L, Denton F, Sokona Y, Thomas JP, La Rovere E, Parikh JK, Parikh K, Rahman AA (2002) Linkages between climate change and sustainable development. Climate Policy 2:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout F, Leach M, Scoones I (2003) Shifting perspectives in environmental social science. In: Berkhout F, Leach M, Scoones I (eds) Negotiating environmental change. Edward Elgar, UK & USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks N, Adger WN (2004) Assessing and enhancing adaptive capacity, Adaptation Policy Framework, Technical Paper 7, UNDP-GEF

  • Bulkeley H, Betsill MM (2003) Cities and climate change: urban sustainability and global environmental governance. Routledge, London & New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Burton I, Huq S, Lim B, Pilifosova O, Schipper EL (2002) From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policy. Climate Policy 2:145–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW (2001) “In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information”: agricultural extension and boundary organisations. Sci Technol Human Values 26:431–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW, Moser SC (2000) Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Glob Environ Change 10(2):109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark W, Mitchell R, Cash D, Alcock F (2002) Information as influence: how institutions mediate the impacts of scientific assessments on global environmental affairs. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Faculty Research Working Papers Series, RWP02-044

  • Conde C, Lonsdale K (2004) Engaging stakeholders in the adaptation process. Adaptation Policy Framework, Technical Paper 2, UNDP-GEF

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. SAGE Publications, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer M (1995) The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernisation and the policy process. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Huq S, Reid H (2004) Mainstreaming adaptation in development. IDS Bull 35(3):15–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Huq S, Rahman A, Konate M, Sokona Y, Reid H (2003) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in least developed countries (LDCS), International Institute for Environment & Development, pp 1–40

  • IPCC (2001) Africa. In: IPCC (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, pp 489–525

  • Keeley J, Scoones I (2003) Understanding environmental policy processes. Earthscan Publications Ltd., UK & USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Keskitalo ECH (2004) A framework for multi-level stakeholder studies in response to global change. Local Environ 9(5):425–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levy M (1996) Assessing the effectiveness of international environmental institutions. Glob Environ Change 9:81–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G, Rutherford M (2001) Heat: impacts of climate change on plant diversity in South Africa. National Botanical Institute

  • Naess LO, Bang Y, Eriksen S, Vevatne J, (2005) Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Glob Environ Change 15:125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Assembly Internal Question Paper No. 5-2005 (2005) http://www.environment.gov.za/parliamentupdate/2005/feb/mjellis_n270e()_natclimatechangeresponse_initiatives_25022005.doc, 4 June 2005

  • National Business Initiative (2003–2004) Annual Report

  • Ogunscitan OA (2003) Framing environmental change in Africa: cross scale institutional constraints on progressing from rhetoric to action against vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 13:101–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan T, Jordan A (1999) Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework. Glob Environ Change 9:81–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patt AG, Gwata C (2002) Effective seasonal climate forecast applications: examining constraints for subsistence farmers in Zimbabwe. Glob Environ Change 12:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA Jr (1998) Rethinking the role of adaptation in climate policy. Glob Environ Change 8:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa (2004) National climate change response strategy for South Africa. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa (2005) Energy efficiency strategy of the Republic of South Africa. Department of Minerals and Energy, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Republic of South Africa (2005) Energy efficiency accord. Department of Minerals and Energy, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (2004) Climate change and the challenge of non-equilibrium thinking. IDS Bull 3:114–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithers J, Smit B (1997) Human adaptation to climate variability and change. Glob Environ Change 7:129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swart R, Robinson J, Cohen S (2003) Climate change and sustainable development: expanding the options. Climate Policy 3:19–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol RSJ, Fankhauser S, Smith JB (1998) The scope for adaptation to climate change: what can we learn from the impact literature? Glob Environ Change 2:109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Booklet (2002) Climate Change Secretariat, UNEP/IUC/2002/9

  • Van Schalkwyk M (2004) Statement by the office of Marthinus van Schalkwyk. Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism: Van Schalkwyk urges global partnerships and local action on climate change, 15 December 2004

  • Van Schalkwyk M (2005) Statement by the office of Marthinus van Schalkwyk. Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism: SA braces for impacts of climate change, major conference to be held in October, Cape Town, 5 May 2005

  • Vedwan N, Rhoades RE (2001) Climate change in the western Himalayas of India: a study of local perception and response. Climate Res 19:109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber EU, (1997) Perception and expectation of climate change: precondition for economic and technological adaptation. In: Bazeman MH, Messick DM, Tenbrunsel A, Wade-Benzoni K (eds) Psychological perspectives to environmental and ethical issues in management. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 314–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamin F (2004) Overview. IDS Bull 3:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2002) The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay and scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2005) With contributions from Arun Agrawal, Leslie A. King, Peter H. Sand, Merrilyn Wasson (1999) Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (IDGEC) Science Plan, IHDP Report No. 16. IHDP, Bonn

Download references

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to all interviewees for their time and comments. Any omissions or errors remain those of the author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingrid Christine Koch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koch, I.C., Vogel, C. & Patel, Z. Institutional dynamics and climate change adaptation in South Africa. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 12, 1323–1339 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9054-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9054-5

Keywords

Navigation