Advertisement

Institutional dynamics and climate change adaptation in South Africa

  • Ingrid Christine Koch
  • Coleen Vogel
  • Zarina Patel
Original Paper

Abstract

Climate change is a multi-dimensional issue and in terms of adaptation numerous state and non-state actors are involved from global to national and local scales. The aim of this paper is first to analyse specific institutional networks involved in climate change predominantly at the national level in South Africa and second to determine how different stakeholders perceive their role vis-a-vis climate change adaptation. Within the South African context there is a gap in understanding and evaluating how institutional networks operate and thus the findings of this work may help inform and strengthen such relationships in the future. Results showed that few institutions fully understand the implications of adaptation and their roles and responsibilities have not yet been properly defined. Constraints relating to capacity, lack of awareness and poor information flow need to be addressed. Climate change is perceived as an important issue although problems such as poverty reduction and job creation remain national priorities. Most importantly this research has demonstrated how adaptation challenges the hierarchical manner in which government works and a more collaborative approach to climate change adaptation is needed. Adaptation needs to be mainstreamed and institutional networks need to be strengthened in order for adaptation mechanisms to be effectively implemented.

Keywords

Adaptation Climate change Institutional networks Perceptions of adaptation 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Special thanks to all interviewees for their time and comments. Any omissions or errors remain those of the author.

References

  1. Adger WN, Vincent K (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. C R Geosci 337:399–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adger WN, Huq S, Brown K, Conway D, Hulme M (2003) Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Prog Dev Stud 3:179–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beg N, Morlot JC, Davidson O, Afrane-Okesse Y, Tyani L, Denton F, Sokona Y, Thomas JP, La Rovere E, Parikh JK, Parikh K, Rahman AA (2002) Linkages between climate change and sustainable development. Climate Policy 2:129–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berkhout F, Leach M, Scoones I (2003) Shifting perspectives in environmental social science. In: Berkhout F, Leach M, Scoones I (eds) Negotiating environmental change. Edward Elgar, UK & USAGoogle Scholar
  5. Brooks N, Adger WN (2004) Assessing and enhancing adaptive capacity, Adaptation Policy Framework, Technical Paper 7, UNDP-GEFGoogle Scholar
  6. Bulkeley H, Betsill MM (2003) Cities and climate change: urban sustainability and global environmental governance. Routledge, London & New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Burton I, Huq S, Lim B, Pilifosova O, Schipper EL (2002) From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policy. Climate Policy 2:145–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cash DW (2001) “In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information”: agricultural extension and boundary organisations. Sci Technol Human Values 26:431–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cash DW, Moser SC (2000) Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Glob Environ Change 10(2):109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Clark W, Mitchell R, Cash D, Alcock F (2002) Information as influence: how institutions mediate the impacts of scientific assessments on global environmental affairs. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Faculty Research Working Papers Series, RWP02-044Google Scholar
  11. Conde C, Lonsdale K (2004) Engaging stakeholders in the adaptation process. Adaptation Policy Framework, Technical Paper 2, UNDP-GEFGoogle Scholar
  12. Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. SAGE Publications, London, UKGoogle Scholar
  13. Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:199–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hajer M (1995) The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernisation and the policy process. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  15. Huq S, Reid H (2004) Mainstreaming adaptation in development. IDS Bull 35(3):15–21Google Scholar
  16. Huq S, Rahman A, Konate M, Sokona Y, Reid H (2003) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in least developed countries (LDCS), International Institute for Environment & Development, pp 1–40Google Scholar
  17. IPCC (2001) Africa. In: IPCC (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, pp 489–525Google Scholar
  18. Keeley J, Scoones I (2003) Understanding environmental policy processes. Earthscan Publications Ltd., UK & USAGoogle Scholar
  19. Keskitalo ECH (2004) A framework for multi-level stakeholder studies in response to global change. Local Environ 9(5):425–435CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Levy M (1996) Assessing the effectiveness of international environmental institutions. Glob Environ Change 9:81–93Google Scholar
  21. Midgley G, Rutherford M (2001) Heat: impacts of climate change on plant diversity in South Africa. National Botanical InstituteGoogle Scholar
  22. Naess LO, Bang Y, Eriksen S, Vevatne J, (2005) Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Glob Environ Change 15:125–138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. National Business Initiative (2003–2004) Annual ReportGoogle Scholar
  24. Ogunscitan OA (2003) Framing environmental change in Africa: cross scale institutional constraints on progressing from rhetoric to action against vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 13:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. O’Riordan T, Jordan A (1999) Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework. Glob Environ Change 9:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Patt AG, Gwata C (2002) Effective seasonal climate forecast applications: examining constraints for subsistence farmers in Zimbabwe. Glob Environ Change 12:185–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Pielke RA Jr (1998) Rethinking the role of adaptation in climate policy. Glob Environ Change 8:159–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Republic of South Africa (2004) National climate change response strategy for South Africa. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  29. Republic of South Africa (2005) Energy efficiency strategy of the Republic of South Africa. Department of Minerals and Energy, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  30. Republic of South Africa (2005) Energy efficiency accord. Department of Minerals and Energy, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  31. Scoones I (2004) Climate change and the challenge of non-equilibrium thinking. IDS Bull 3:114–119Google Scholar
  32. Smithers J, Smit B (1997) Human adaptation to climate variability and change. Glob Environ Change 7:129–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Swart R, Robinson J, Cohen S (2003) Climate change and sustainable development: expanding the options. Climate Policy 3:19–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tol RSJ, Fankhauser S, Smith JB (1998) The scope for adaptation to climate change: what can we learn from the impact literature? Glob Environ Change 2:109–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Booklet (2002) Climate Change Secretariat, UNEP/IUC/2002/9Google Scholar
  36. Van Schalkwyk M (2004) Statement by the office of Marthinus van Schalkwyk. Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism: Van Schalkwyk urges global partnerships and local action on climate change, 15 December 2004Google Scholar
  37. Van Schalkwyk M (2005) Statement by the office of Marthinus van Schalkwyk. Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism: SA braces for impacts of climate change, major conference to be held in October, Cape Town, 5 May 2005Google Scholar
  38. Vedwan N, Rhoades RE (2001) Climate change in the western Himalayas of India: a study of local perception and response. Climate Res 19:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weber EU, (1997) Perception and expectation of climate change: precondition for economic and technological adaptation. In: Bazeman MH, Messick DM, Tenbrunsel A, Wade-Benzoni K (eds) Psychological perspectives to environmental and ethical issues in management. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 314–341Google Scholar
  40. Yamin F (2004) Overview. IDS Bull 3:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Young OR (2002) The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay and scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  42. Young OR (2005) With contributions from Arun Agrawal, Leslie A. King, Peter H. Sand, Merrilyn Wasson (1999) Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (IDGEC) Science Plan, IHDP Report No. 16. IHDP, BonnGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ingrid Christine Koch
    • 1
  • Coleen Vogel
    • 2
  • Zarina Patel
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental StudiesUniversity of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.University of the WitwatersrandJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations