Abstract
Climate change is a multi-dimensional issue and in terms of adaptation numerous state and non-state actors are involved from global to national and local scales. The aim of this paper is first to analyse specific institutional networks involved in climate change predominantly at the national level in South Africa and second to determine how different stakeholders perceive their role vis-a-vis climate change adaptation. Within the South African context there is a gap in understanding and evaluating how institutional networks operate and thus the findings of this work may help inform and strengthen such relationships in the future. Results showed that few institutions fully understand the implications of adaptation and their roles and responsibilities have not yet been properly defined. Constraints relating to capacity, lack of awareness and poor information flow need to be addressed. Climate change is perceived as an important issue although problems such as poverty reduction and job creation remain national priorities. Most importantly this research has demonstrated how adaptation challenges the hierarchical manner in which government works and a more collaborative approach to climate change adaptation is needed. Adaptation needs to be mainstreamed and institutional networks need to be strengthened in order for adaptation mechanisms to be effectively implemented.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In accordance with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) Articles 4 and 12, South Africa has to submit National Communications to the Convention incorporating a national inventory of greenhouse gas emissions; a description of envisaged steps to implement the Convention and any other information considered relevant by the party (UN Framework Convention on Climate Change Booklet 2002).
Minmec is a political structure which facilitates inter-tier communications and is the interface between the Minister and the Provincial members of the Executive Councils (from the National Climate Change Response Strategy for South Africa, 2004).
Mintech is a non-political structure serving as a technical committee that advises Minmec. It comprises of the Director-General and the relevant provincial department heads (from the National Climate Change Response Strategy for South Africa, 2004).
Quote by the Chief Director of the Climate Change Directorate, DEAT (2005).
References
Adger WN, Vincent K (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. C R Geosci 337:399–410
Adger WN, Huq S, Brown K, Conway D, Hulme M (2003) Adaptation to climate change in the developing world. Prog Dev Stud 3:179–195
Beg N, Morlot JC, Davidson O, Afrane-Okesse Y, Tyani L, Denton F, Sokona Y, Thomas JP, La Rovere E, Parikh JK, Parikh K, Rahman AA (2002) Linkages between climate change and sustainable development. Climate Policy 2:129–144
Berkhout F, Leach M, Scoones I (2003) Shifting perspectives in environmental social science. In: Berkhout F, Leach M, Scoones I (eds) Negotiating environmental change. Edward Elgar, UK & USA
Brooks N, Adger WN (2004) Assessing and enhancing adaptive capacity, Adaptation Policy Framework, Technical Paper 7, UNDP-GEF
Bulkeley H, Betsill MM (2003) Cities and climate change: urban sustainability and global environmental governance. Routledge, London & New York
Burton I, Huq S, Lim B, Pilifosova O, Schipper EL (2002) From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policy. Climate Policy 2:145–159
Cash DW (2001) “In order to aid in diffusing useful and practical information”: agricultural extension and boundary organisations. Sci Technol Human Values 26:431–453
Cash DW, Moser SC (2000) Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Glob Environ Change 10(2):109–120
Clark W, Mitchell R, Cash D, Alcock F (2002) Information as influence: how institutions mediate the impacts of scientific assessments on global environmental affairs. John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Faculty Research Working Papers Series, RWP02-044
Conde C, Lonsdale K (2004) Engaging stakeholders in the adaptation process. Adaptation Policy Framework, Technical Paper 2, UNDP-GEF
Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotny H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. SAGE Publications, London, UK
Grothmann T, Patt A (2005) Adaptive capacity and human cognition: the process of individual adaptation to climate change. Glob Environ Change 15:199–213
Hajer M (1995) The politics of environmental discourse: ecological modernisation and the policy process. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Huq S, Reid H (2004) Mainstreaming adaptation in development. IDS Bull 35(3):15–21
Huq S, Rahman A, Konate M, Sokona Y, Reid H (2003) Mainstreaming adaptation to climate change in least developed countries (LDCS), International Institute for Environment & Development, pp 1–40
IPCC (2001) Africa. In: IPCC (eds) Climate change 2001: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Cambridge University Press, pp 489–525
Keeley J, Scoones I (2003) Understanding environmental policy processes. Earthscan Publications Ltd., UK & USA
Keskitalo ECH (2004) A framework for multi-level stakeholder studies in response to global change. Local Environ 9(5):425–435
Levy M (1996) Assessing the effectiveness of international environmental institutions. Glob Environ Change 9:81–93
Midgley G, Rutherford M (2001) Heat: impacts of climate change on plant diversity in South Africa. National Botanical Institute
Naess LO, Bang Y, Eriksen S, Vevatne J, (2005) Institutional adaptation to climate change: flood responses at the municipal level in Norway. Glob Environ Change 15:125–138
National Assembly Internal Question Paper No. 5-2005 (2005) http://www.environment.gov.za/parliamentupdate/2005/feb/mjellis_n270e()_natclimatechangeresponse_initiatives_25022005.doc, 4 June 2005
National Business Initiative (2003–2004) Annual Report
Ogunscitan OA (2003) Framing environmental change in Africa: cross scale institutional constraints on progressing from rhetoric to action against vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 13:101–111
O’Riordan T, Jordan A (1999) Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework. Glob Environ Change 9:81–93
Patt AG, Gwata C (2002) Effective seasonal climate forecast applications: examining constraints for subsistence farmers in Zimbabwe. Glob Environ Change 12:185–195
Pielke RA Jr (1998) Rethinking the role of adaptation in climate policy. Glob Environ Change 8:159–170
Republic of South Africa (2004) National climate change response strategy for South Africa. Department of Environmental Affairs and Tourism, Pretoria
Republic of South Africa (2005) Energy efficiency strategy of the Republic of South Africa. Department of Minerals and Energy, Pretoria
Republic of South Africa (2005) Energy efficiency accord. Department of Minerals and Energy, Pretoria
Scoones I (2004) Climate change and the challenge of non-equilibrium thinking. IDS Bull 3:114–119
Smithers J, Smit B (1997) Human adaptation to climate variability and change. Glob Environ Change 7:129–146
Swart R, Robinson J, Cohen S (2003) Climate change and sustainable development: expanding the options. Climate Policy 3:19–40
Tol RSJ, Fankhauser S, Smith JB (1998) The scope for adaptation to climate change: what can we learn from the impact literature? Glob Environ Change 2:109–123
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change Booklet (2002) Climate Change Secretariat, UNEP/IUC/2002/9
Van Schalkwyk M (2004) Statement by the office of Marthinus van Schalkwyk. Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism: Van Schalkwyk urges global partnerships and local action on climate change, 15 December 2004
Van Schalkwyk M (2005) Statement by the office of Marthinus van Schalkwyk. Minister of Environmental Affairs and Tourism: SA braces for impacts of climate change, major conference to be held in October, Cape Town, 5 May 2005
Vedwan N, Rhoades RE (2001) Climate change in the western Himalayas of India: a study of local perception and response. Climate Res 19:109–117
Weber EU, (1997) Perception and expectation of climate change: precondition for economic and technological adaptation. In: Bazeman MH, Messick DM, Tenbrunsel A, Wade-Benzoni K (eds) Psychological perspectives to environmental and ethical issues in management. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp 314–341
Yamin F (2004) Overview. IDS Bull 3:1–10
Young OR (2002) The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay and scale. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Young OR (2005) With contributions from Arun Agrawal, Leslie A. King, Peter H. Sand, Merrilyn Wasson (1999) Institutional Dimensions of Global Environmental Change (IDGEC) Science Plan, IHDP Report No. 16. IHDP, Bonn
Acknowledgements
Special thanks to all interviewees for their time and comments. Any omissions or errors remain those of the author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Koch, I.C., Vogel, C. & Patel, Z. Institutional dynamics and climate change adaptation in South Africa. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 12, 1323–1339 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9054-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9054-5