Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Temporary Carbon Sequestration Cannot Prevent Climate Change

  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Storing carbon in biosphere sinks can reduce atmospheric CO2 concentrations in the short term. However, this lowers the concentration gradient between the atmosphere and the oceans and other potential carbon reservoirs, and consequently reduces the rate of CO2 removal from the atmosphere. If carbon is released again from that temporary storage, subsequent atmospheric CO2 concentrations will, therefore, be higher than without temporary carbon storage. It is thus important to analyse whether temporary carbon storage in biosphere sinks can mitigate climate-change impacts. To analyse that, climate-change impacts need to be quantified explicitly.

Impacts can be quantified:

  1. [(1)]

    as the instantaneous effect of increased temperature

  2. [(2)]

    through the rate of temperature increase

  3. [(3)]

    as the cumulative effect of increased temperatures.

The analysis presented here shows that temporary carbon storage only reduces climate-change impacts related to the cumulative effect of increased temperature and could even worsen impacts mediated via the instantaneous effect of temperature or the rate of temperature change. This applies under both high and low greenhouse-gas emission scenarios. Because temporary carbon storage improves some, but worsens other, climate-change impacts, it achieves very little on average. For greenhouse mitigation, it is, therefore, not warranted to provide policy incentives for temporary carbon storage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Alcamo, J. and Kreileman, E.: 1996, ‘Emission scenarios and global climate protection’, Global Environmental Change 6, 305–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S., Cannell, M., Kauppi, P. and Sathaye, J.: 1996, ‘Management of forests for mitigation of Greenhouse gas emissions’, in R.T. Watson, M.C. Zinyowera and R.H. Moss (eds.), Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses. Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 773–797.

  • Cannell, M.G.R. and Milne, R.: 1995, ‘Carbon pools and sequestration in forest ecosystems in Britain’, Forestry 68, 361–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside, P.M.: 2002, ‘Why a 100-year time horizon should be used for global warming mitigation calculations’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 7, 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside, P.M., Lashof, D.A. and Moura-Costa, P.: 2000, ‘Accounting for time in mitigating global warming through land-use change and forestry’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5, 239–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D.O.: 1997, ‘Biomass energy in industrialised countries – a view of the future’, Forest Ecology and Management 91, 17–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardner, J.J., Frumhoff, P.C. and Goetze, D.C.: 2000, ‘Prospects for mitigating carbon, conserving biodiversity, and promoting socioeconomic development objectives through the Clean Development Mechanism’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5, 61–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, L.D.D.: 2004, ‘Declining temporal effectiveness of carbon sequestration: Implications for compliance with the United National Framework Convention on Climate Change’, Climatic Change 63, 259–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasselmann, K., Sausen, R., Maier-Reimer, E. and Voss, R.: 1993, ‘On the cold start problem in transient simulations with coupled atmosphere-ocean models’, Climate Dynamics 9, 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, R.A.: 1999, ‘The annual net flux of carbon to the atmosphere from changes in land use 1850–1990’, Tellus 50B, 298–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC: 2000, Special Report on Emissions Scenarios. A Special Report of Working Group III of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.

  • Kirschbaum, M.U.F.: 2001, ‘The role of forests in the global carbon cycle’, in R.J. Raison, A.G. Brown and D.W. Flinn (eds.), Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management, IUFRO 7 Research Series, CAB International Publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp. 311–339.

  • Kirschbaum, M.U.F.: 2003a. ‘Can trees buy time? An assessment of the role of vegetation sinks as part of the global carbon cycle’, Climatic Change 58, 47–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschbaum, M.U.F.: 2003b, ‘To sink or burn? A discussion of the potential contributions of forests to greenhouse gas balances through storing carbon or providing biofuels’, Biomass and Bioenergy 24, 297–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschbaum, M.U.F. and Cowie, A.L.: 2004. ‘Giving credit where credit is due. A practical method to distinguish between human and natural factors in carbon accounting’, Climatic Change 67, 417–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschbaum, M.U.F., Schlamadinger, B., Cannell, M.G.R., Hamburg, S.P., Karjalainen, T., Kurz, W.A., Prisley, S., Schulze, E.-D. and Singh, T.P.: 2001, ‘A generalised approach of accounting for biospheric carbon stock changes under the Kyoto Protocol’, Environmental Science and Policy 4, 73–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korhonen, R., Pingoud, K., Savolainen, I. and Matthews, R.: 2002, ‘The role of carbon sequestration and the tonne-year approach in fulfilling the objective of climate convention’, Environmental Science and Policy 5, 429–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lecocq, F. and Chomitz, K.: 2001, Optimal Use of Carbon Sequestration in a Global Climate Change Strategy: Is There a Wooden Bridge to a Clean Energy Future? The World Bank Group, Working Paper No. 2635, 27 pp.

  • Maclaren J.P.: 1996, ‘Plantation forestry: its role as a carbon sink’, in W.J. Bouma, G.I. Pearman and M.R. Manning (eds.), Greenhouse: Coping With Climate Change, Collingwood, Australia, CSIRO, pp. 417–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marland, G. and Schlamadinger, B.: 1997, ‘Forests for carbon sequestration or fossil fuel substitution? A sensitivity analysis’, Biomass and Bioenergy 13, 389–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marland, G. and Schlamadinger, B.: 1999, ‘The Kyoto Protocol could make a difference for the optimal forest-based CO2 mitigation strategy: Some results from GORCAM’, Environmental Science and Policy 2, 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meier-Reimer, E. and Hasselmann, K.: 1987, ‘Transport and storage of CO2 in the ocean - an inorganic ocean-circulation carbon cycle model’, Climate Dynamics 2, 63–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinshausen, M. and Hare, B. (2002), ‘Temporary sinks do not cause permanent climatic benefits. Achieving short-term emissions reduction targets at the future's expense. Greenpeace Background Paper, 7 pp.

  • Metting, F.B., Smith, J.L., Amthor, J.S. and Izaurralde, R.C.: 2001, ‘Science needs and new technology for increasing soil carbon sequestration’, Climatic Change 51, 11–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moura Costa, P. and Wilson, C.: 2000, ‘An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and sequestration - description and applications in forestry’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5, 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nabuurs, G.J. and Mohren, G.M.J.: 1995, ‘Modelling analysis of potential carbon sequestration in selected forest types’, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 25, 1157–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noble, I., Apps, M., Houghton, R., Lashof, D., Makundi, W., Murdiyarso, D., Murray, B., Sombroek, W., Valentini, R., Amano, M., Fearnside, P.M., Frangi, J., Frumhoff, P., Goldberg, D., Higuchi, N., Janetos, A., Kirschbaum, M., Lasco, R., Nabuurs, G.J., Persson, R., Schlesinger, W., Shvidenko, A., Skole, D. and Smith, P.: 2000, ‘Implications of different definitions and generic issues’, in R.T. Watson, I.R. Noble, B. Bolin, N.H. Ravindranath, D.J. Verardo and D.J. Dokken (eds.), Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 52–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, I. and Scholes, R.J.: 2001, ‘Sinks and the Kyoto Protocol’, Climate Policy 1, 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, S.C. and Teisberg, T.J.: 1994, ‘Optimal carbon emissions trajectories when damages depend on the rate of or level of global warming’. Climatic Change 28, 289–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, S.C. and Teisberg, T.J.: 1995, ‘Optimal CO2 control policy with stochastic losses from temperature rise’, Climatic Change 31, 19–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petschel-Held, G., Schellnhuber, H.-J., Bruckner, T. and Toth, F.L.: 1999, ‘The tolerable windows approach: Theoretical and methodological foundations’, Climatic Change 41, 303–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, V., Boucher, O., Haigh, J., Hauglustaine, D., Haywood, J., Myhre, G., Nakajima, T., Shi, G.Y. and Solomon, S.: 2001, ‘Radiative forcing of climate change’, in J.T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell and C.A. Johnson (eds.), Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis, Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 349–416.

  • Schopfhauser, W.: 1998, ‘World forests: The area for afforestation and their potential for fossil carbon sequestration and substitution’, in G.H. Kohlmaier, M. Weber and R.A. Houghton (eds.), Carbon dioxide mitigation in forestry and wood industry. Springer Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 185–203.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J.B., Schellnhuber, H.-J, Monirul Qader Mirza, M., Fankhauser, S., Leemans, R., Erda, L., Ogallo, L., Pittock, B., Richels, R., Rosenzweig, C., Safriel, U., Tol, R.S.J., Weyant, J. and Yohe, G.: 2001, ‘Vulnerability of climate change and reasons for concern: A synthesis’, in J.J. McCarthy, O.F. Canziani, N.A. Leary, D.J. Dokken, K.S. White (eds.), Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability, Contribution of Working Group II to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 913–967.

  • Vitousek, P.M.: 1991, ‘Can planted forests counteract increasing atmospheric carbon dioxide?’, Journal of Environmental Quality 20, 348–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watterson, I.G.: 2000, ‘Interpretation of simulated global warming using a simple model’, Journal of Climate 13, 202–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigley, T.M.L.: 1991, ‘A simple inverse carbon cycle model’, Global Biogeochemical. Cycles 5, 373–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CSIRO Forestry and Forest Products, PO Box E4008, Kingston ACT 2604, Australia

    Miko U. F. Kirschbaum

  2. Environmental Biology Group, Australian National University, GPO Box 475, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia

    Miko U. F. Kirschbaum

  3. CRC for Greenhouse Accounting, GPO Box 475, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia

    Miko U. F. Kirschbaum

Authors
  1. Miko U. F. Kirschbaum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miko U. F. Kirschbaum.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kirschbaum, M.U.F. Temporary Carbon Sequestration Cannot Prevent Climate Change. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 11, 1151–1164 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9027-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-006-9027-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation