Developing Canada's National Forest Carbon Monitoring, Accounting and Reporting System to Meet the Reporting Requirements of the Kyoto Protocol

Article

Abstract

The rate of carbon accumulation in the atmosphere can be reduced by decreasing emissions from the burning of fossil fuels and by increasing the net uptake (or reducing the net loss) of carbon in terrestrial (and aquatic) ecosystems. The Kyoto Protocol addresses both the release and uptake of carbon. Canada is developing a National Forest Carbon Monitoring, Accounting and Reporting System in support of its international obligations to report greenhouse gas sources and sinks. This system employs forest-inventory data, growth and yield information, and statistics on natural disturbances, management actions and land-use change to estimate forest carbon stocks, changes in carbon stocks, and emissions of non-CO2 greenhouse gases. A key component of the system is the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector (CBM-CFS). The model is undergoing extensive revisions to enable analyses at four spatial scales (national, provincial, forest management unit and stand) and in annual time steps. The model and the supporting databases can be used to assess carbon-stock changes between 1990 and the present, and to predict future carbon-stock changes based on scenarios of future disturbance rates and management actions.

Keywords

accounting carbon budget model CBM-CFS greenhouse gas emissions Kyoto Protocol monitoring natural disturbances reporting NFCMARS 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amiro, B.D., Todd, J.B., Wotton, B.M., Logan, K.A., Flannigan, M.D., Stocks, B.J., Mason, J.A., Martell, D.L. and Hirsch, K.G.: 2001, ‘Direct carbon emissions from Canadian forest fires, 1959–1999’, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32, 512–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Apps, M.J., Kurz, W.A., Beukema, S.J. and Bhatti, J.S.: 1999, ‘Carbon budget of the Canadian forest product sector’, Environmental Science and Technology 2, 25–41.Google Scholar
  3. Bernier, P.Y., Fournier, R.A., Ung, C.H., Robitaille, G., Laroque, G.R., Lavigne, M.B., Boutin, R., Raulier, F., Pare, D., Beaubien, J. and Delise, C.: 1999, ‘Linking ecophysiology and forest productivity: An overview of the ECOLEAP project’, The Forestry Chronicle 75, 417–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatti, J.S., Apps, M.J. and Tarnocai, C.: 2000, ‘Estimates of soil organic carbon stocks in central Canada using three different approaches’, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32, 805–812.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bonnor, G.M.: 1985, Inventory of Forest Biomass in Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Petawawa National Forestry Instititute, Chalk River, Ontario.Google Scholar
  6. Gillis, M.D.: 2001, ‘Canada's National Forest Inventory (responding to current information needs)’, Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 67, 121–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. IPCC Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: 2003, Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land-Use Change and Forestry, Institute for Global Environmental Strategies, Japan.Google Scholar
  8. Kurz, W.A. and Apps, M.J.: 1999, ‘A 70-year retrospective analysis of carbon fluxes in the Canadian forest sector’, Ecological Applications 9(2), 526–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kurz, W.A., Apps, M.J., Webb, T.M. and McNamee, P.J.: 1992, The Carbon Budget of the Canadian Forest Sector: Phase I. Forestry Canada, Northwest Region. Information Report NOR-X-326.Google Scholar
  10. Kurz, W.A., Apps, M.J., Banfield, E. and Stinson, G.: 2002, ‘Forest carbon accounting at the operational scale’, The Forestry Chronicle 78, 672–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leckie, D.G., Gillis, M.D. and Wulder, M.A.: 2002, ‘Deforestation estimation for Canada under the Kyoto Protocol: A design study’, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing 28, 672–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Li, Z., Apps, M.J., Banfield, E. and Kurz, W.A.: 2002, ‘Estimating net primary production of forests in the Canadian Prairie Provinces using an inventory-based carbon budget model’, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32, 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Li, Z., Kurz, W.A., Apps, M.J. and Beukema, S.J.: 2003, ‘Belowground biomass dynamics in the Carbon Budget Model of the Canadian Forest Sector: Recent improvements and implications for the estimation of NPP and NEP’, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 33, 126–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lowe, J.J., Power, K., and Gray, S.L.: 1994, Canada's Forest Inventory 1991. Information Report PI-X-115, Canadian Forest Service, Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Chalk River, Ontario.Google Scholar
  15. Shaw, C.H., Bhatti, J.S., and Sabourin, K.: 2005, An Ecosystem Carbon Database for Canadian Forests, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta, Information Report NOR-X-403.Google Scholar
  16. Siltanen, R.M., Apps, M.J., Zoltai, S.C., Mair, R.M. and Strong, W.L.: 1997, A Soil Profile and Organic Carbon Data Base for Canadian Forest and Tundra Mineral Soils, Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Northern Forestry Centre, Edmonton, Alberta.Google Scholar
  17. Stocks, B.J., Lee, B.S. and Martell, D.L.: 1996, ‘Some potential carbon budget implications of fire management in the boreal forest’, in M.J. Apps and D.T. Price (eds.), Forest ecosystems, forest management and the global carbon cycle, Heidelberg, Springer Verlag, NATO ASI Series I 40, pp. 89–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Stocks, B.J., Mason, J.A., Todd, J.B., Bosch, E.M., Wotton, B.M., Amiro, B.D., Flannigan, M.D., Hirsch, K.G., Logan, K.A., Martell, D.L., and Skinner, W.R.: 2002, “Large forest fires in Canada, 1959 –1997’, Journal of Geophysical Research 107, 8149 [printed 108(D1), 2003].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Trofymow, J.A., Moore, T.R., Titus, B.D., Prescott, C., Morison, I., Siltanen, M., Smith, S., Fyles, J., Wein, R., Camire, C., Duschene, L., Kozak, L., Kranabetter, M. and Visser, S.: 2002, ‘Rates of litter decomposition over 6 years in Canadian forests: Influence of litter quality and climate’, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 32, 789–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wood, J., Gillis, M.D., Goodenough, D.G., Hall, R.J., Leckie, D.G., Luther, J.E. and Wulder, M.A.: 2002, ‘Earth observation for sustainable development of forests (EOSD): Project overview’, in IGARSS 2002, Proceedings: IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium and the 24th Canadian Symposium on Remote Sensing. June 24–28, 2002, Toronto, Canada. IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest ServicePacific Forestry CentreVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations