Abstract
Enteric fermentation in livestock is an important source of anthropogenic methane emission. India, with its large livestock population, is estimated to contribute 10.8 Tg of methane annually from this source. An evaluation of various methane mitigation options indicate that some of the available technologies like, diet supplementation with feed additive and molasses urea product are highly cost effective in reducing enteric methane emissions. The gross cost of methane abatement from use of feed additive monensin premix ranges from €0.6 to €1.8/ton CO2 equivalent, for buffaloes and indigenous cows, respectively. The gross cost of enteric methane mitigation from supplementing molasses urea products and dietary manipulation through increased concentrate feeding is much higher. But, as the monetary value of the increased milk production on application of these technologies was higher than the annual cost of reduction strategy for buffaloes and crossbred cows, the net costs of the former mitigation option was negative for buffaloes (€-28.1/ton CO2) and of the latter for crossbred cows (€-7.0/ton CO2,). The availability of cost-effective technologies suggest that the methane mitigation projects under CDM, can be planned in the Indian dairy sector to the mutual benefit of countries with emission targets and India. The vast dairy animal population of India and resulting methane emissions provide good opportunity these countries to buy reasonable quantum of emission credits from projects in India. Such projects will work to the benefit to India by providing a tool for technology transfer to increase animal productivity and attract capital that assists in more prosperous and environmental friendly milk production in the country.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ADAS: 1998, ‘Effectiveness and feasibility of cost measures to reduce methane emissions from livestock in the EU’, in DGXI, Options to Reduce Methane Emissions, Final report: AEAT-3773, Issue3. http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/enveco/climatechange/methaneemissions.pdf
ALGAS: 1998, Asia-Least Cost Gas Abatement Strategy: Bangladesh, Asia Development Bank, Global Environment Facility, United Nations Development Programme, Manila, Philippines. http://www.adb.org/Documents/Reports/ALGAS/BAN/default.asp
Amble, V.N., Murthy, V.R., Sathe, K.V. and Goel, B.B.P.S.: 1965, ‘Milk production of bovines in India and their feed availability’, Indian Journal of Veterinary Science 35, 221–238.
ARM: 2001, ARM Facilities Newsletter, ANL/ER/N-01-07, Argonne National Laboratory, Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Programme, The Univ. of Chicago. http://education.arm.gov/outreach/publications/sgp/july01.pdf
Armstrong, D.G. and Gilbert, H.J.: 1985, ‘Biotechnology and the rumen’, Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 36, 655–656.
Asanuma, A., Iwamoto, M. and Hino, T.: 1999, ‘Effect of the addition of fumarate on methane production by ruminal microorganisms in vitro’, Journal of Dairy Science 82, 780–787.
Baker, S.K.: 1995, ‘Method for improving utilization of nutrients by ruminant or ruminant like animals’, International Patent, WO9511041.
Bauchop, T.: 1967, ‘Inhibition of rumen methanogenesis by methane analogues’, Journal of Bacteriology 94, 171–175.
Benchaar, C., Pomar, C. and Chiquette, J.: 2001, ‘Evaluation of diet strategies to reduce methane production in ruminants: a modelling approach’, Canadian Journal of Animal Sciences 81, 563–574.
Birthal, P.S., Kumar, A., Ravishankar, A. and Pandey, U. K.: 1999, Sources of Growth in the Livestock Sector, NCAP Policy Paper 9, New Delhi, India, National Centre for Agricultural Economics and Policy Research.
Bowman, R.L., Croucher, J.C. and Picard, M.T.: 1992, Assessment of the Pre-feasibility of Strategic Supplementation as an Opportunity for Reducing Methane Emissions in Gujarat, India, A.T. International, prepared for the Global Change Division, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
Bundick, P. and Riberio, S.: 2000, The Development and Commercialization of Pashu Poshak: Applying the BDS Performance Measurement Framework to AT India's Livestock Feed Supplement Project, Microenterprise Best practices, Development Alternatives Inc., USA. http://www.enterpriseworks.org/PDFs/DevelopandCommercofPashuPoshak.pdf
Carro, M.D., Lopez, S., Valdes, C. and Ovejero, F.J.: 1999, ‘Effect of D,L-malate on mixed ruminal microorganism fermentation using the rumen simulation technique (RUSITEC)’, Animal Feed Science and Technology 79, 279–288.
Chalupa, W.: 1980, ‘Chemical control of rumen microbial activity’, in Y. Ruckebusch and P.Thivend (eds.), Digestive Physiology and Metabolism in Ruminants, MTP Press, Lancaster, England, 325–347.
Chen, M. and Wolin, M.J.: 1979, ‘Effect of monensin & lasalocid sodium on the growth of methanogenic & rumen saccharolytic bacteria’, Applied Environmental Microbiology 38, 72–77.
Cole, N.A. and McCroskey, J.E.: 1975, ‘Effects of hemiacetal of chloral and starch on the performance of beef steers’, Journal of Animal Science 41, 1735–1741.
DGXI: 1998, Options to reduce Methane emissions, Final report: AEAT-3773, Issue3. http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/enveco/climatechange/methaneemissions.pdf
Frumholtz, P.P., Newbold, C.J. and Wallace, R.J.: 1989, ‘Influence of Aspergillus oryzae fermentation extract on the fermentation of a basal ration in the rumen simulation technique (Rusitec)’, Journal of Agricultural Science (Cambridge) 113, 169–172.
Greiner, S. and Michaelowa, A.: 2003, ‘Defining Investment Additionality for CDM projects- practical approaches’, Energy Policy 31 1007–1015.
Gribbin, J.: 1988, ‘The greenhouse effect’, New Scientist 120, 1–4.
Hanson, S.: 1992, ‘Distribution in nature of reduced one carbon compounds and microbes that utilize them’, in J.C. Murrell and H. Dalton (eds.), Methane and Methanol Utilizers, Plenum Press, New York, 1–22.
Harvey, A., Matthews, E. and Sarma, D.: 2003, ‘The Global Methane cycle’, http://icp.giss.nasa.gov/research/METHANE/gmc.html
Johnson, K.A. and Johnson, D.E.: 1995, ‘Methane emissions from cattle’, Journal of Animal Science 73, 2483–2492.
Lopez, S., Valdes, C., Newbold, C.J. and Wallace, R.J.: 1999, ‘Influence of sodium fumarate addition on rumen fermentation in vitro’, British Journal of Nutrition 81, 59–64.
Mathison, G.W., Okine, E.K., McAllister, T.A., Dong, Y., Galbraith. J. & Dmytruk, O.I.N.: 1998, ‘Reducing Methane emission from ruminant animals’, Journal of Applied Animal Research 14, 1–28.
Moss, A.R.: 1994, ‘ Methane production by ruminants –Literature review of I. Dietary manipulation to reduce methane production and II. Laboratory procedures for estimating methane potential of diets’, Nutr. Abstr. Rev. Ser. B, 64, 786–806.
Pearson, B. and Shao, Loong, Y.: 2003, ‘The CDM: reducing greenhouse gas emissions or re-labelling business as usual?’, Bali, CDM Watch. http://www.cdmwatch.org/files/CDMWatch_ThirdWorldNetwork_2003_CDMAdditionality.pdf
Robertson, T.D., Riberio, S.A., Zodrow, S. and Breman, J.V.: 1994, ‘Assessment of strategic livestock feed supplementation as an opportunity for generating income for small-scale dairy producers and reducing methane emissions in Bangladesh’, Appropriate Technology International, USA.
Shu, Q., Gill, H.S., Hennessy, D.W., Leng, R.A., Bird, S.H. and Rowe, J.B.: 1999, ‘Immunisation against lactic acidosis in cattle’, Res. Vet. Sci. 67, 65–71.
Singh, G.P.: 1998, ‘Methanogenesis and production of green House gases under animal Husbandry system’, Final report of A.P.Cess funded project, Karnal, Haryana, India, National Dairy Research Institute.
Singh, G.P.: 2001, ‘Livestock Production and Environmental Protection’, Lead Paper Proceeding of the 10th Animal Nutrition Conference, Karnal, Haryana, India, National Dairy Research Institute.
Singhal, K.K. and Mohini, M.: 2002, ‘Uncertainty reduction in methane and nitrous oxide gases emission from livestock in India’, Project report, Karnal, Haryana, India, National Dairy Research Institute.
Singhal, K.K. and Mohini, M.: 2003, ‘Inventory Estimates of Methane Emissions from Indian livestock’, Proceedings of the 3rd International Methane and Nitrous Oxide Mitigation Conference, Beijing, China, http://www.coalinfo.net.cn/coalbed/meeting/2203/papers/agriculture/AG025.pdf
Sirohi, Smita and Michaelowa, A.: 2004, ‘CDM potential of dairy sector in India’, HWWA Discussion paper 273, Hamburg Institute of International Economics, Germany. http://www.hwwa.de/Forschung/Publikationen/Discussion_Paper/2004/273.pdf
Srivastava, A.K. and Garg, M.R.: 2002, ‘Use of sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique for measurement of methane emission from ruminants’, Indian Journal of Dairy Science 55(1), 36–39.
Trei, J.E., Parish, R.C., Singh, Y.K. and Scott, G.C.: 1972, ‘Effect of methane inhibitors on rumen metabolism and feedlot performance of sheep’, Journal of Dairy Science 54, 536–540.
Van Nevel, C.J. and Demeyer, D.I.: 1995, ‘Feed additives and other interventions for decreasing methane emissions’, in R.J. Wallace and A. Chesson (eds.), Biotechnology in Animal Feeds & Animal Feeding, VCH, Weinheim, 329–349.
Weil, C.F., Sgerf, B. A. and Reeve, J. N.: 1989, ‘A comparison of the methyl reductase genes and gene products’, Canadian Journal of Microbiology I 35, 101–108.
Wolfe, R.S.: 1982, ‘Biochemistry of methanogenesis’, Experientia 38, 198–200.
Wolin, M.J.: 1979, ‘The rumen fermentation: a model for microbial interactions in anaerobic ecosystems’, in M. Alexander (ed.), Advances in Microbial Ecology, Plenum, New York & London, vol. 3, 49–77.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sirohi, S., Michaelowa, A. & Sirohi, S.K. Mitigation Options for Enteric Methane Emissions from Dairy Animals: An Evaluation for Potential CDM Projects in India. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 12, 259–274 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9012-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-005-9012-7