Baseline Carbon Stocks Assessment and Projection of Future Carbon Benefits of a Carbon Sequestration Project in East Timor

Article

Abstract

Climate change is one of the most pressing environmental problems humanity is facing today. Forest ecosystems serve as a source or sink of greenhouse gases, primarily CO2. With support from the Canadian Climate Change Fund, the Community-based Natural Resource Management for Carbon Sequestration project in East Timor (CBNRM-ET) was implemented to “maintain carbon (C) stocks and increase C sequestration through the development of community-based resource management systems that will simultaneously improve livelihood security”. Project sites were in the Laclubar and Remexio Sub-districts of the Laclo watershed. The objective of this study was to quantify baseline C stocks and sequestration benefits of project components (reforestation with fast-growing species, primarily Casuarina equisetifolia, and agroforestry involving integration of Paraserianthes falcataria). Field measurements show that mature stands (≥30 years) of P. falcataria and C. equisetifolia contain up to 200 Mg C ha−1 in above ground biomass, indicating the vast potential of project sites to sequester carbon. Baseline C stocks in above ground biomass were very low in both Laclubar (6.2 Mg C ha−1 for reforestation sites and 5.2 Mg C ha−1 for agroforestry sites and Remexio (3.0 Mg C ha−1 for reforestation and 2.5 Mg C ha−1 for agroforestry). Baseline soil organic C levels were much higher reaching up to 160 Mg C ha−1 in Laclubar and 70 Mg C ha−1 in Remexio. For the next 25 years, it is projected that 137 671 Mg C and 84 621 Mg C will be sequestered under high- and low C stock scenarios, respectively.

Keywords

agroforestry carbon sequestration East Timor soil organic carbon tropical plantations 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Brown, S.: 1997, Estimating Biomass and Biomass Change of Tropical Forest: A Primer, FAO Forestry Paper 134, Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO).Google Scholar
  2. Brown, S.: 1993, ‘Tropical forests and the global carbon cycle: The need for sustainable land-use systems’, Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 46, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, S., Sathaye, J., Cannel, M. and Kauppi, P.: 1996, ‘Management of forests for mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions’ in R.T. Watson, M.C. Zinyowera and R.H. Moss (eds.), Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations, and Mitigation of Climate Change: Scientific-Technical Analyses, Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press. pp. 775–797.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, S., Lugo, A.E. and Chapman, J.: 1986, ‘Biomass of tropical tree plantations and its implications for the global carbon budget’, Canadian Journal of Forest Research 16, 390–394.Google Scholar
  5. CARE: 2002, Community-Based Natural Resource Management for Carbon Sequestration In East Timor: Project Implementation Plan. Dili, East Timor, CARE International.Google Scholar
  6. ETTA, ADB, WB and UNDP: 2001, The 2001 Survey Of ‘Sucos’ : Initial Analysis and Implications for Poverty Reduction. Dili, East Timor.Google Scholar
  7. Hairiah, K., Sitompul, S.M., van Noordwijk, M. and Palm, C.: 2001, Methods for Sampling Carbon Stocks Above and Below Ground. ASB Lecture Series Note 4B, Bogor, Indonesia, International Center for Research in Agroforestry (ICRAF).Google Scholar
  8. Houghton, J.T., Meira Filho, L.G., Lim, B., Treanton, K., Mamaty, I., Bonduki, Y., Griggs, D.J. and Callander, B.A. (eds.): 1997, Greenhouse Gas Inventory Workbook, Paris, France, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) and the International Energy Agency (IEA).Google Scholar
  9. IPCC: 2003, Good Practice Guidance for Land Use, Land Use Change and Forestry, Kanagawa, Japan, The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme.Google Scholar
  10. IPCC Working Group I: 2001, ‘Climate change 2001: The scientific basis. Contribution of working group I to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change’, in J.T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell and C.A. Johnson (eds.), Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. IPCC Working Group III: 2001, ‘Climate change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of working group III to the third assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change’, in J.T. Houghton, Y. Ding, D.J. Griggs, M. Noguer, P.J. van der Linden, X. Dai, K. Maskell and C.A. Johnson (eds.), Cambridge and New York, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ketterings, Q.M., Coe, R., van Noordwijk, M., Ambagau, Y. and Palm, C.A.: 2001, ‘Reducing uncertainty in the use of allometric biomass equations for predicting above-ground tree biomass in mixed secondary forests’, Forest Ecology and Management 120, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lasco, R.D.: 2002, ‘Forest carbon budgets in Southeast Asia following harvesting and land cover change’, Science in China 45, 55–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lasco, R.D.: 2001, Carbon Budgets of Forest Ecosystems in Southeast Asia Following Disturbance and Restoration, Review Paper Prepared for the GCTE-APN Project ‘Land Use Change and the Terrestrial Carbon Cycle in Asia’, Environmental Forestry Programme, CFNR, University of the Philippines, College, Laguna, Philippines.Google Scholar
  15. Lasco, R.D. and Pulhin, F.B.: 2003, ‘Philippine forest ecosystems and climate change: Carbon stocks, rate of sequestration and the Kyoto Protocol’, Annals of Tropical Research 25(2), 37–51.Google Scholar
  16. Lasco, R.D. and Pulhin, F.B.: 2000, ‘Forest land-use change in the Philippines and climate change mitigation’, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies to Global Change Journal 5, 81–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacDicken, K.G.: 1997, A Guide to Monitoring Carbon Storage in Forestry and Agroforestry Projects, Virginia, USA, Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development.Google Scholar
  18. Martins, J.R.: 2001, ‘Development of forest conservation’, in Sustainable Development and the Environment in East Timor, Dili, East Timor, Timor Aid, pp. 31–33.Google Scholar
  19. Nunes, M.N.: 2001, ‘The natural resources of East Timor: A physical, geographical and ecological review’, in Sustainable Development and the Environment in East Timor, Dili, East Timor, Timor Aid, pp. 29–30.Google Scholar
  20. PCARR: 1980, Standard Methods of Analysis for Soil, Plant Tissue, Water and Fertilizer, Los Banos, Laguna, Philippines, Philippine Council for Agriculture and Resources Research. 194 pp.Google Scholar
  21. Pedersen, J. and Arneberg, M. (eds): 1999, Social and Economic Conditions in East Timor, International Conflict Resolution Program, New York and Oslo, School of International and Public Affairs, Columbia University and Fafo Institute of Applied Science.Google Scholar
  22. Polgase, J., Paul, K.I., Khanna, P.K., Gwinyai Nyakuengama, J., O'onnel, A.M., Grove, T.S. and Battaglia, M.: 2000, Changes in Soil Carbon Following Afforestation or Reforestation, National Carbon Accounting System Technical Report No. 20. Australian Greenhouse Office. 102 pp.Google Scholar
  23. Silver, W.L., Kueppers, L.M., Lugo, A.E., Ostertag, R. and Matzek, V.: 2004, ‘Carbon sequestration and plant community dynamics following reforestation of tropical pasture,’ Ecological Applications 14, 1115–1127.Google Scholar
  24. Sundland, O.T., Brycesson, I., de Carvalho, D., Rio, N., da Silva, J. and Silva, M.S.: 2001, Assessing Environmental Priorities in East Timor, Final Report, Dili, East Timor.Google Scholar
  25. Trexler, M. C. and Haugen, C.: 1994, Keeping it Green: Tropical Forestry Opportunities for Mitigating Climate Change, Washington D.C., World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
  26. UNFCCC: 2004, ‘Modalities and procedures for afforestation and reforestation project activities under the clean development mechanism in the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol’, Decision 19/CP 9. UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. FCCC/CP/2003/6/Add.2 30 March 2004.Google Scholar
  27. Watson, R.T., Noble, I.R., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N.H., Verado, D.J. and Dokken, D.J. (eds): 2000, Land Use, Land-use Change, and Forestry: Special Report of the Intergovermental Panel for Climate Change, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Young, A.: 1997, Agroforestry for Soil Management, 2nd edition, Wallingford/Nairobi, CAB International & International Centre for Research in Agroforestry.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF), PhilippinesUniversity of the Philippines at Los Baños 4031 CollegeLagunaPhilippines
  2. 2.CARE International, SKBDiliEast Timor

Personalised recommendations