Mitigation of the Impact of Tropical Cyclones in Northern Australia through Community Capacity Enhancement

Article

Abstract

Community mitigation of hazard impact requires hazard knowledge and preparedness on the part of the members of diverse and complex communities. Longitudinal research in the tropical cyclone prone north of Australia has gathered extensive datasets on community awareness, preparedness and knowledge, in order to contribute to education campaigns and mitigation strategies. Data have been used to identify issues of vulnerability to cyclones and capacity to deal with the hazard. This has been developed as a community vulnerability and capacity model that may be applied to diverse communities in order to assess levels of capability to mitigate and deal with the cyclone hazard. The model is presented here in a simplified form as its development is evolving and ongoing.

Keywords

capacity community resilience tropical cyclone vulnerability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ABS: 1998, CData 96 (Final Release), CD-ROM databases from the 1996 National Census, Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra.Google Scholar
  2. Alway, J., Belgrave, L.L. and Smith, K.L.: 1998, ‘Back to normal: Gender and disaster’, Symbolic Interaction 21(2), 175–195.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson-Berry, L.: 2002, Community Vulnerability to Landfalling Tropical Cyclones and Storm Surge. PhD Thesis, James Cook University at Townsville/Cairns.Google Scholar
  4. Aysan, Y. and Oliver, P.: 1987, Housing and Culture After Earthquakes, Oxford, UK, Oxford Polytechnic.Google Scholar
  5. Barton, A.H.: 1969, Communities in Disaster: A Sociological Analysis of Collective Stress Situations, Garden City, NJ, Doubleday.Google Scholar
  6. Bates, F., Fogelman, C.W., Parenton, B., Pittman, R. and Tracy, G.: 1963, ‘The social and psychological consequences of a natural disaster’, NRC Disaster Study, Vol. 18, Washington, DC, National Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  7. Blakie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I. and Wisner, B.: 1994, At Risk – Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Bolin, R.: 1994, ‘Post-disaster Shelter and Housing: Social Processes in Response and Recovery’, in R. Dynes and K. Tierney (eds.), Disaster, Collective Behaviour and Social Organisation, Newark, University of Delaware Press, pp. 115–127.Google Scholar
  9. Bolin, R. and Stanford, L.: 1998, The Northridge Earthquake: Vulnerability and Disaster, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Bureau of Transport Economics: 2001, Economic Costs of Natural Disasters in Australia, Report No. 103, Canberra, Bureau of Transport Economics.Google Scholar
  11. Callaghan, J.: 1998, Tropical Cyclone Impacts Along the Australian East Coast from November to April 1867 to 1997, unpublished working document, Brisbane, Bureau of Meteorology.Google Scholar
  12. Cannon, T.: 1994, ‘Vulnerability analysis and the explanation of “Natural Disasters”, in A. Varley (ed.), Disasters, Development and the Environment, Chichester, John Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Cannon, T.: 2000, ‘Vulnerability analysis and disasters’, in D.J. Parker (ed.), Floods Vols 1 & 2, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Crichton, D.: 1999, ‘The risk triangle’, in J. Ingleton (ed.), Natural Disaster Management, London, Tudor Rose.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, N.Y.: 1986, ‘Earthquake, tsunami resettlement and survival in two north Pacific Alaskan native villages: Natural disasters and cultural responses’, Studies in Third World Societies, Vol. 36, Williamsburg, VA, College of William and Mary.Google Scholar
  16. Davis, M.: 1998, The Ecology of Fear, New York, Metropolitan.Google Scholar
  17. Durkheim, E.: 1964, The Division of Labour in Society, New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dynes, R.: 1989, ‘Reconstruction in the context of recovery: Thoughts on the Alaskan earthquake’, Proceedings NCEER Conference Buffalo, New York, National Earthquake Resource Center.Google Scholar
  19. Emergency Management Australia: 2000, Emergency Risk Management: Applications Guide, Canberra, Australia, Emergency Management.Google Scholar
  20. Enarson, E. and Fordham, M.: 2000, ‘Lines that divide, ties that bind: Race, class and gender in women's flood recovery in the US and UK’, The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 15(4), 43–52.Google Scholar
  21. Fothergill, A.: 1996, ‘Gender, risk and disaster’, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, November 1998, 14(1), 33–56.Google Scholar
  22. Fothergill, A., Maestas, E. and Darlington, J.: 1999, ‘Race, ethnicity and disasters in the United States: A review of the literature’, Disasters 23(2), 156–173.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Friesma, P., Caporoso, J., Goldstein, G., Lineberry, R. and McLeary, R.: 1979, Aftermath: Communities after Natural Disasters, Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Fritz, C.: 1961, ‘Disasters’, Contemporary Social Problems, in R. Merton and R. Nisbit (eds.), New York, Hardcourt, pp. 651–694.Google Scholar
  25. Geipel, R.: 1982, Disaster and Reconstruction, London, George Allen and Unwuin.Google Scholar
  26. Granger, K.: 1993, ‘Understanding Queensland's storm tide hazard’, Presentation Paper from AURISA 21st Annual International Conference, Adelaide, Australia, 23–26 November, 1993.Google Scholar
  27. Granger, K.J.: 1997, ‘Lifelines and the AGSO cities project’, The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 12(1), 16–18.Google Scholar
  28. Granger, K., Jones, T., Leiba, M. and Scott, G.: 1999, Community Risk in Cairns: A Multi Hazard Risk Assessment, Canberra, Australian, Australian Geological Survey Organisation.Google Scholar
  29. Haas, E., Kates, R. and Bowden, M. (eds.): 1977, Reconstruction Following Disaster Cambridge, Mass, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hewitt, K.: 1997, Regions of Risk: A Geographical Introduction to Disasters, Essex, UK, Longman.Google Scholar
  31. Ilf, J.: 1995, Community Development. Creating Community Alternatives – Vision Analysis and Practice, South Melbourne, Longman, pp. 1–3, 14–17, 89–94.Google Scholar
  32. Kaniasty, K. and Norris, F.H.: 1999, ‘The experience of disaster: Individuals and communities sharing trauma’, in R. Gist, R. Lubin and B. Lubin (eds.), Response to Disaster, Philadelphia, PA, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  33. Keys, C.: 1991, ‘Community analysis, some considerations for disaster preparedness and response’, The Macedon Digest, June, 6(2), 13–16.Google Scholar
  34. King, D.: 2002, ‘Post Disaster Surveys: Experience and methodology’, Australian Journal of Emergency Management 17(3).Google Scholar
  35. Meyer, P.: 1997, Tropical Cyclones, Zurich, Swiss Reinsurance Co.Google Scholar
  36. Mileti, D.S., Drabek, T.E. and Haas, J.E.: 1975, Human Systems in Extreme Environments: A Sociological Perspective, Colorado, USA, Institute of Behavioral Science.Google Scholar
  37. Mileti, D. and Passerini, E.: 1996, ‘A social explanation of urban relocation after earthquakes’, International Journal of Mass Emergencies 14(1), 97–110.Google Scholar
  38. Mileti, D.: 1999, Disasters by design: A reassessment of natural hazards in the United States, Washington, DC, Joseph Henry Press.Google Scholar
  39. Mitchell, J.K.: 1989, ‘Hazards research’, in G. L. Galle and C. J. Willmott (eds.), Geography in America, Columbus, OH, Merrill, pp. 410–24.Google Scholar
  40. Morrow, B.H. and Phillips, P. (eds.): 1998, ‘Women and disasters’, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, Special Issue, 17, 5–130.Google Scholar
  41. Neuman, W.L.: 1997, Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Boston, Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  42. Newby, H.: 1987, ‘Community and urban life’, in P. Worsley (ed.), The New Introducing Society, London, Penguin.Google Scholar
  43. Passerini, E.: 2000, ‘Disasters as agents of social change in recovery and reconstruction’, Natural Hazards Review 1(2), 67–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Peacock, W., Morrow, B. and Gladwin, H.: 1997, Hurricane Andrew: Ethnicity, Gender and the Sociology of Disaster, London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Raggatt, P., Butterworth, E. and Morrissey, S.: 1993, ‘Issues in natural disaster management: Community response to the threat of tropical cyclones in Australia’, Disaster Prevention and Management 2(3), 12–21.Google Scholar
  46. Rossi, P., Wright, J., Wright, S. and Weber-Burdin, E.: 1978, ‘Are there long term effects of American natural disasters?’, Mass Emergencies 3, 117–132.Google Scholar
  47. Salter, J.: 1995, ‘Disasters as manifestations of vulnerability’, The Australian Journal of Emergency Management 10, 9–10.Google Scholar
  48. Smithson, P.: 1993, ‘Tropical cyclones and their changing impact’, Geography 339(78), pt. 2, 170–174.Google Scholar
  49. Stehlik, D., Lawrence, G. and Gray, S.: 2000, ‘Gender and drought: Experiences of Australian women in the drought of the 1990’s’, Disasters 24(1), 38–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Sweet, S.: 1998, ‘The effect of a natural disaster on social cohesion: A longitudinal study’, International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters 6(3), 321–331.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, J.B.: 1972, ‘An approach to the analysis of emergent phenomena’, Proceedings Japan – United States Disaster Residential Seminar: Organizational and Community Responses to Disasters, Columbus, Ohio, Disaster Research Center, pp. 110–129.Google Scholar
  52. Tierney, K. and Dahlhamer, J.: 1997, ‘Business disruption preparedness and recovery’, Lessons from the Northridge Earthquake, Preliminary Paper No. 257, Newark, Delaware, Disaster Research Centre.Google Scholar
  53. Turner, R. and Killien, L.: 1987, Collective Behaviour, 3rd edn, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  54. Varley, A. (ed.): 1994, Disasters Development and the Environment, Chichester, John Wiley.Google Scholar
  55. Wadley, D. and King, W. (eds.): 1993, Reef, Range and Red Dust, Brisbane, Queensland, Department of Lands.Google Scholar
  56. Walters, K.J.: 1978, ‘The reconstruction of Darwin after cyclone tracy’, Disasters 2(1), 59–68.Google Scholar
  57. Winter, I.: 2000, ‘Major themes and debates in the social capital literature: The Australian connection’, in I. Winter, (ed.), Social Capital and Public Policy in Australia, Melbourne, AIFS.Google Scholar
  58. Wisner, B.: 1993, ‘Disaster vulnerability: Scale power and daily life’, Geographical Journal 30(2), 127–140.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science + Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Disaster Mitigation Policy Planning ServicesAustralian Bureau of MeteorologyMelbourneAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Disaster StudiesJames Cook UniversityCarinsAustralia

Personalised recommendations