Abstract
Publishing is central to the academic reward system. Contributorship issues loom large in this context. The need for fairness in authorship decisions is upheld in most collaborations, yet some collaborations are plagued by “nightmare” issues ranging from inappropriate authorship credit to author order issues to exploitation of students and postdocs. This present work analyzes the mechanisms that researchers use for addressing problems in research collaboration and authorship. The data are derived from face-to-face, phone or Skype interviews with 60 university researchers. The extent to which author crediting decisions are explicitly or implicitly communicated and communicated in advance versus in the aftermath of the completion of research are central features in conflict resolution. Explicit approaches are associated with fields characterized by large or infrastructure-intensive projects, whereas implicit approaches often represent unspoken discipline-based norms. Efforts to educate students in how to manage authoring decisions tend to use advance methods. Problems stemming from a difficult researcher’s actions cross these categories. Early communication would seem to be useful for issue resolution, but it is not widely used in part because it can lock-in to an author crediting plan too tightly and reduce flexibility as research directions change.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baskin, Patricia. 2014. Authorship and contributorship: Who did what. Science Editor 37(1): 39–45.
Beaver, D., and R. Rosen. 1978. Studies in scientific collaboration, Part I: The professional origins of scientific co-authorship. Scientometrics 1: 65–84.
Biagioli, Mario. 1998. The instability of authorship: Credit and responsibility in contemporary biomedicine. The FASEB Journal 12(1): 3–16.
Börner, Katy, Luca Dall’Asta, Weimao Ke, and Alessandro Vespignani. 2005. Studying the emerging global brain: Analyzing and visualizing the impact of co-authorship teams. Complexity 10(4): 57–67.
Bozeman, Barry. 2000. Bureaucracy and red tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bozeman, Barry, Jan Youtie, Monica Gaughan, Catherine Slade, and Heather Rimes. 2012. When Research Collaboration Turns Bad: Routinely Bad vs. Nightmare Collaborations. Paper prepared for presentation at the International Meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science, Copenhagen Denmark, October 2012.
Bozeman, Barry, Daniel Fay, and Catherine Slade. 2013. Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer 38(1): 1–67.
Bozeman, Barry, and Craig Boardman. 2014. Research collaboration and team science: A state-of-the-art review and agenda. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Bozeman, Barry, Monica Gaughan, Jan Youtie, Catherine P. Slade, and Heather Rimes. 2015. Research Collaboration Experiences, Good and Bad: Dispatches from the Front Lines. Science and Public Policy (Online first).
Council of Science Editors. 1999. White paper on promoting integrity in scientific journal publications. http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/editorial_policies/white_paper.cfm.
Crane, Diana. 1972. Invisible colleges: Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Dance, Amber. 2012. When scientists collaborate on an experiment and a paper, it can be hard to decide who gets the credit and how much. Nature 489: 591–593.
Davenport, Elisabeth, and Blaise Cronin. 2001. Who dunnit? Metatags and hyperauthorship. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 52(9): 770–773.
de Solla Price, Derek. 1963. Little science, big science. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
Devine, Emily Beth, Johnny Beney, and Lisa A. Bero. 2005. Equity, Accountability, Transparency: Implementation of the Contributorship Concept in a Multi-site Study. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education 69: 455–459.
Funk, Carolyn L., Kirsten A. Barrett, and Francis L. Macrina. 2007. Authorship and publication practices: Evaluation of the effect of responsible conduct of research instruction to postdoctoral trainees. Accountability in Research Policies and Quality Assurance 14: 269–305.
Gasparyan, Armen Yuri, Lilit Ayvazyan, and George D. Kitas. 2013. Authorship problems in scholarly journals: Considerations for authors, peer reviewers and editors. Rheumatology International 33(2): 277–284.
Glänzel, Wolfgang. 2002. Coauthorship patterns and trends in the sciences (1980–1998): A bibliometric study with implications for database indexing and search strategies. Library Trends 50(3): 461–475.
Haeussler, Carolyn, and Henry Sauermann. 2013. Credit where credit is due? The impact of project contributions and social factors on authorship and inventorship. Research Policy 42(3): 688–703.
Lacasse, Jeffrey R., and Jonathan Leo. 2010. Ghostwriting at Elite Academic Medical Centers in the United States. PLoS Medicine 7(2): e1000230.
Lagnado, Max. 2003. Increasing the Trust in Scientific Authorship. British Journal of Psychiatry 183(1): 3–4.
Lee, Sooho, and Barry Bozeman. 2005. The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science 35(5): 673–702.
Levine, John M., and Richard L. Moreland. 1994. Group socialization: Theory and research. European Review of Social Psychology 5(1): 305–336.
Lissoni, Francesco, and Fabio Montobbio. 2008. Inventorship and authorship in patent-publication pairs: An enquiry into the economics of scientific credit. CESPRI – University Bocconi. Working Paper.
Macrina, Francis L., Carolyn L. Funk, and Kirsten Barrett. 2004. Effectiveness of responsible conduct of research instruction: Initial findings. Journal of Research Administration 35(2): 6–12.
Marušić, Matko, Jadranka Božikov, Vedran Katavić, Darko Hren, Marko Kljaković-Gašpić, and Ana Marušić. 2004. Authorship in a Small Medical Journal: A Study of Contributorship Statements by Corresponding Authors. Science and Engineering Ethics 10(3): 493–502.
Marušić, Ana, Lana Bošnjak, and Ana Jerončić. 2011. A Systematic Review of Research on the Meaning, Ethics and Practices of Authorship across Scholarly Disciplines. PLoS One 6(9): e23477.
Merton, Robert K. 1973. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Patton, Stacey. 2012. My Advisor Stole My Research. Chronicle of Higher Education. November 11, 2012.
Pichini, Simona, Marta Pulido, and Óscar García-Algar. 2005. Authorship in Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: An Author’s Position and Its Value. Science and Engineering Ethics 11(2): 173–175.
Rennie, Drummond. 2001. Who did what? Authorship and Contribution in 2001. Muscle and Nerve 24(10): 1274–1277.
Rennie, Drummond, and Annette Flanagin 1994. Authorship! authorship! Guests, ghosts, grafters, and the two-sided coin. Journal of the American Medical Association 271(6): 469–471.
Rennie, Drummond, Annette Flanagin, and Veronica Yank. 2000. The Contributions of Authors. Journal of the American Medical Association 284: 89–91.
Rennie, Drummond, Veronica Yank, and Linda Emanuel. 1997. When Authorship Fails. A Proposal to Make Contributors Accountable. Journal of the American Medical Association 278(7): 579–585.
Schmidt, Peter. 2013. New Test to Measure Faculty Collegiality Produces Some Dissension Itself. The Chronicle of Higher Education: June 10, 2013.
Shrum, Wesley, Ivan Chompalov, and Joel Genuth. 2001. Trust, Conflict and Performance in Scientific Collaborations. Social Studies of Science 31: 681–697.
Sismondo, Sergio. 2009. Ghosts in the Machine: Publication Planning in the Medical Sciences. Social Studies of Science 39(2): 171–198.
Smith, Richard. 1997. Authorship is dying: Long live contributorship. The BMJ 315(7110): 696.
Sonnenwald, Diane H. 2007. Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41(1): 643–681.
Subramanyam, Krishnappa. 1983. Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science 6(1): 33–38.
Vasconcelos, Sonia M.R., Nicholas H. Steneck, Melissa Anderson, Hatisaburo Masuda, Marisa Palacios, José C.S. Pinto, and Martha M. Sorenson. 2012. The new geography of scientific collaboration. EMBO Reports 13(5): 404–407.
Wade, Nicholas. 2006. One Last Question: Who Did the Work? New York Times, January 17, 2006.
Washburn, Jason J. 2008. Encouraging Research Collaboration through Ethical and Fair Authorship: A Model Policy. Ethics and Behavior 18(1): 44–58.
Youtie, Jan, and Barry Bozeman. 2014. Social dynamics of research collaboration: Norms, practices, and ethical issues in determining co-authorship rights. Scientometrics 101(2): 953–962.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Youtie, J., Bozeman, B. Dueling Co-Authors: How Collaborators Create and Sometimes Solve Contributorship Conflicts. Minerva 54, 375–397 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9303-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9303-z