Advertisement

Minerva

, Volume 51, Issue 3, pp 363–387 | Cite as

The Culture of Mediocrity

  • Joseph C. HermanowiczEmail author
Article

Abstract

Select groups and organizations embrace practices that perpetuate their inferiority. The result is the phenomenon we call “mediocrity.” This article examines the conditions under which mediocrity is selected and maintained by groups over time. Mediocrity is maintained by a key social process: the marginalization of the adept, which is a response to the group problem of what to do with the highly able. The problem arises when a majority of a group is comprised of average members who must decide what to do with high performers in the group. To solve this problem, reward systems are subverted to benefit the less able and the adept are cast as deviant. Marginalization is a resolution of two tensions: marginalization of the adept for their behavior, and protection from the adept for the mediocre. The American research university is used as an example to describe the phenomenon and to formulate a theoretic argument. The forms and consequences of marginalization are discussed. Marginalizing the adept illustrates an anti-meritocratic behavioral pattern which serves to sustain social systems on which all people, however able, depend.

Keywords

Higher education Stratification Reward systems Academic careers Universities 

References

  1. Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, Jeffrey C. (ed.). 1987. The micro-macro link. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ainsworth-Darnell, James W., and Douglas B. Downey. 1998. Assessing the oppositional culture explanation for racial/ethnic differences in school performance. American Sociological Review 63: 536–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, Howard S., Blanche Geer, and Everett C. Hughes. 1968. Making the grade: The academic side of college life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Berger, Joseph, Cecilia Ridgeway, M. Hamit Fisek, and Robert Z. Norman. 1998. The legitimation and delegitimation of power and prestige orders. American Sociological Review 63: 379–405.Google Scholar
  6. Blau, Peter M. 1973. The organization of academic work. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  7. Bosk, Charles. 1979. Forgive and remember: Managing medical failure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1983. The field of cultural production, or the economic world reversed. Poetics 12: 311–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984a. Homo academicus. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1984b. Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Burawoy, Michael. 1979. Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burris, Val. 2004. The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks. American Sociological Review 69: 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castilla, Emilio J., and Stephen Benard. 2010. The paradox of meritocracy in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly 55: 543–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cole, Jonathan R., and Stephen Cole. 1973. Social stratification in science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Collins, Randall. 1971. Functional and conflict theories of educational stratification. American Sociological Review 36: 1002–1019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collins, Randall. 1975. Conflict sociology: Toward an explanatory science. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Collins, Randall. 1988. The micro contribution to macro sociology. Sociological Theory 6: 242–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins, Randall. 1992. Conflict theory. In Encyclopedia of sociology, vol. 1, eds. Edgar F. Borgatta, and Marie L. Borgatta, 288–290. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Cook, Karen S., and Karen A. Hegtvedt. 1983. Distributive justice, equity, and equality. Annual Review of Sociology 9: 217–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Davis, Kingsley, and Wilbert E. Moore. 1945. Some principles of stratification. American Sociological Review 10: 242–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. De Waal, Frans. 2007. Chimpanzee politics. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Durkheim, Emile. [1895] 1982. The rules of sociological method. Edited with an introduction by Steven Lukes (transl: Halls, W.D.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  23. Farkas, George, Christy Lleras, and Steve Maczuga. 2002. Does oppositional culture exist in minority and poverty peer groups. American Sociological Review 67: 148–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Feather, N.T. 1989. Attitudes towards the high achiever: The fall of the tall poppy. Australian Journal of Psychology 41: 239–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fine, Gary Alan. 2012. Tiny publics: A theory of group action and culture. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  26. Fordham, Signithia, and John U. Ogbu. 1986. Black students’ school success: Coping with the burden of ‘acting white’. Urban Review 18: 176–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fordham, Signithia. 1996. Blacked out: Dilemmas of race, identity, and success at capital high. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Freidson, Eliot. 1970. Professional dominance. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  29. Gamson, William A. 1961. A theory of coalition formation. American Sociological Review 26(3): 373–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gaston, Jerry. 1978. The reward system in British and American science. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Goode, William J. 1967. The protection of the inept. American Sociological Review 32: 5–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Goode, William J. 1978. The celebration of heroes: Prestige as a control system. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hegtvedt, Karen A., and Barry Markovsky. 1995. Justice and injustice. In Sociological perspectives on social psychology, eds. Karen S. Cook, Gary Alan Fine, and James S. House, 257–280. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  34. Hegtvedt, Karen A. 2007. Theories of social justice. In Encyclopedia of sociology, ed. George Ritzer, 4432–4436. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Hodson, Randy. 2001. Dignity at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hodson, Randy, Vincent J. Roscigno, and Steven H. Lopez. 2006. Chaos and the abuse of power: Workplace bullying in organizational and interactional context. Work and Occupations 33: 382–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Irwin, John, and Donald R. Cressey. 1962. Thieves, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems 10: 142–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jackall, Robert. 1997. Wild cowboys: Urban marauders and the forces of order. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Jasso, Guillermina. 1980. A new theory of distributive justice. American Sociological Review 45(1): 3–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jermier, J. 1988. Sabotage at work: A rational view. Research in the Sociology of Organizations 6: 101–134.Google Scholar
  41. Katchadourian, Herant, and John Boli. 1994. Cream of the crop: The impact of elite education in the decade after college. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  42. Kempner, Joanna, Jon F. Merz, and Charles L. Bosk. 2011. Forbidden knowledge: Public controversy and the production of nonknowledge. Sociological Forum 26: 475–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kluegel, J.R., and E.R. Smith. 1986. Beliefs about inequality: Americans’ views of what is and what ought to be. New York: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  44. Kohn, Melvin L. 1977. Class and conformity: A study in values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Ladd, E.C. 1994. The American ideology. Storrs, CT: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research.Google Scholar
  46. Ladd, E.C., and K.H. Bowman. 1998. Attitudes toward economic inequality. Washington, DC: El Press.Google Scholar
  47. Long, J. Scott, and Mary Frank Fox. 1995. Scientific careers: Universalism and particularism. Annual Review of Sociology 21: 45–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Merton, Robert K. 1973a. The normative structure of science. In The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, ed. Norman W. Storer, 267–278. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Article originally published in 1942.Google Scholar
  49. Merton, Robert K. 1973b. The Matthew effect in science. In The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, ed. Norman W. Storer, 439–459. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Article originally published in 1969.Google Scholar
  50. Merton, Robert K., and Harriet Zuckerman. 1973. Age, aging, and age structure in science. In The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations, ed. Norman W. Storer, 497–559. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Article originally published in 1972.Google Scholar
  51. Merton, Robert K. [1957] 1968a. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  52. Merton, Robert K. [1957] 1968b. The self-fulfilling prophecy. In Social theory and social structure, 475–490. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  53. Metzger, Walter P. 1973. Academic tenure in America: A historical essay. In Faculty tenure, eds. William R. Keast, and John W. Macy Jr., 93–159. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  54. Morrill, Calvin, Mayer N. Zald, and Hayagreeva Rao. 2003. Covert political conflict in organizations: Challenges from below. Annual Review of Sociology 29: 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The social system. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  56. Phillips, Damon J., and Ezra W. Zuckerman. 2001. Middle-status conformity: Theoretical restatement and empirical demonstration in two markets. American Journal of Sociology 107: 379–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Reskin, Barbara. 1977. Scientific productivity and the reward system of science. American Sociological Review 42: 491–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ridgeway, Cecilia. 2006a. Status construction theory. In Contemporary social psychological theories, ed. Peter J. Burke, 301–323. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Ridgeway, Cecilia. 2006b. Inequality, status, and the construction of status beliefs. In Handbook of sociological theory, ed. Jonathan H. Turner, 323–340. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  60. Ridgeway, Cecilia. 2012. What binds low status members to the group? Paper presented at the International Sociological Association Forum, Buenos Aires, Argentina.Google Scholar
  61. Rivera, Lauren. 2012. Hiring as cultural matching: The case of elite professional service firms. American Sociological Review 77(6): 999–1022.Google Scholar
  62. Roy, Donald. 1958. ‘Banana time’: Job satisfaction and informal interaction. Human Organization 18: 158–168.Google Scholar
  63. Roy, Donald. 1952. Quota restriction and goldbricking in a machine shop. American Journal of Sociology 57: 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Roy, Donald. 1954. Efficiency and ‘the fix’: Informal intergroup relations in a piecework machine shop. American Journal of Sociology 60: 255–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Salin, Denise. 2003. Ways of explaining workplace bullying: A review of enabling, motivating and precipitating structures and processes in the work environment. Human Relations 56: 1213–1232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shils, Edward. 1972. The constitution of society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  67. Shils, Edward. 1984. The academic ethic. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  68. Simmel, Georg. 1906. The sociology of secrecy and of the secret societies. American Journal of Sociology 11: 441–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Smigel, Erwin. 1964. The Wall Street lawyer: Professional organization man? Glencoe, IL: Free Press.Google Scholar
  70. Tumin, Melvin M. 1953. Principles of stratification: A critical analysis. American Sociological Review 18: 387–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Twale, Darla J., and Barbara M. De Luca. 2008. Faculty incivility. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  72. Twenge, Jean M., Kathleen R. Cantanese, and Roy F. Baumeister. 2002. Social exclusion causes self-defeating behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83: 606–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Ward, David A., and Gene G. Kassebaum. 1965. Women’s prison: Sex and social structure. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  74. Welsh, Sandy. 1999. Gender and sexual harassment. Annual Review of Sociology 25: 169–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Western, Bruce. 2006. Punishment and inequality in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  76. Willis, Paul. 1977. Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Zuckerman, Harriet, and Robert K. Merton. 1971. Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalization, structure and functions of the referee system. Minerva 9: 66–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zuckerman, Harriet. 1977. Scientific elite: Nobel laureates in the United States. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  79. Zuckerman, Harriet. 1988. The sociology of science. In Handbook of sociology, ed. Neil J. Smelser, 511–574. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe University of GeorgiaAthensUSA

Personalised recommendations