Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The Scientific Field During Argentina’s Latest Military Dictatorship (1976–1983): Contraction of Public Universities and Expansion of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET)

  • Published:
Minerva Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study looks at some of the traits that characterized Argentina’s scientific and university policies under the military regime that spanned from 1976 through 1983. To this end, it delves into a rarely explored empirical observation: financial resource transfers from national universities to the National Scientific and Technological Research Council (CONICET, for its Spanish acronym) during that period. The intention is to show how, by reallocating funds geared to Science and Technology, CONICET was made to expand and decentralize to the detriment of universities. This was the primary tool used by the military regime to thwart higher education’s research development, bolstering research efforts at other realms. Thus, CONICET grew in budget, number of researchers, and staff size, creating new research institutes, while national universities struggled with reduced funding and were forced to shut down their institutes and programs. As a result, CONICET virtually concentrated all scientific research, foregoing the knowledge accumulated at universities, which drove a wedge between both institutions. This military approach to science and technology policy-making is discussed, bearing in mind the notion of dependence—both in terms of the state’s intervention in the inner workings of the scientific-university field as well as regarding the role played by international financial support in scientific research development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In Argentina, national or public (state-run) universities encompass most of the undergraduate population, are funded by the federal state, and are tuition-free. Students pay for books, supplies and materials.

  2. This ‘Budget Program’ [Finalidad Ciencia y Técnica] includes ‘all the activities aimed at the acquisition of new knowledge or research into knowledge applications, including research and development, technology transfers, graduate programs for research training, as well as science and technology promotion activities’ (SECYT 1981: 113).

  3. The data included in this chart does not fully match the data included in Figure 1, as both sets come from different sources. However, both reflect the same trend.

  4. This information is based on CONICET’s Informe de Actividades 1976–1982, published in early 1983. In order to validate this data, which could have been biased in order to bolster CONICET’s image at a politically delicate time, two metrics have been selected—namely, number of researchers and number of local scholarship recipients per year. Then, a detailed review of all CONICET Board Resolutions was conducted in order to corroborate the data. This procedure showed that the overall figures published CONICET were accurate, as they matched actual facts.

  5. As per CONICET’s Resolution Nbr. 217, dated November 25, 1976.

  6. In addition, CONICET also took other decentralizing steps, including a 42-percent salary bonus for researchers willing to settle down outside the metropolitan area, coverage of moving expenses, and rental payments for up to 36 months (CONICET 1978: 21).

  7. CONICET’s resolutions issued in 1976–1983 were reviewed one by one to isolate those dealing with grants. According to our review, CONICET awarded 9,982 grants during this period.

  8. This is a brief account of a more profound analysis on Argentina’s scientific field during the military regime made by the author for her doctoral thesis, La estructura del campo científico argentino: reconfiguraciones, desplazamientos y transferencias producidas durante la última dictadura militar. For her thesis, the author used a complex methodological tool called Multiple Correspondence Analysis to relate multiple variables associated with both institutes and heads. Some partial conclusions have been published in: Bekerman, Fabiana. 2013. Science during Argentina’s military dictatorship (1976–1983): The contraction of the higher education system and the expansion of CONICET. In The politics of academic autonomy in Latin America, ed. Beigel, Fernanda, pp. 227–247. ISBN 978-1-4094-3186-2. London: Ashgate.

  9. This budget recovery unfolded during the so-called “normalisation” period. By then, the “disciplinary purge” had taken place; faculty members had been replaced; academic curricula and study plans had been revised; academic enrolment had already decreased, and a new Organic Law of Universities had been passed (Act Nbr. 22.207).

References

  • Bohdziewicz, Juan Carlos. 2004. Bernardo A. Houssay y los institutos del CONICET. Buenos Aires: Instituto Bibliográfico “Antonio Zinny”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchbinder, Pablo. 2005. Historia de las Universidades Argentinas. Buenos Aires: Sudamericana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari, Paola. 2005. Políticas universitarias, estrategias de gestión y privatización del espacio público: los estudios de potsgrado y la transferencia de servicios y saberes. Un estudio comparado entre Brasil y Argentina. In Espacio público y privatización del conocimiento. Estudios sobre políticas universitarias en América Latina, eds. Gentili, P. and Levy, B. Buenos Aires: CLACSO.

  • Gertel, Hector. 1989. Aspectos distributivos en el análisis del subsidio a la educación universitaria en la Argentina. Revista Crítica y Utopía, N°14–15. Buenos Aires.

  • Mignone, Emilio. 1998. Política y Universidad. El Estado legislador. Buenos Aires: IDEAS.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Missing Individuals (CONADEP, for its acronym in Spanish). 1984. Nunca Más. Buenos Aires: Eudeba.

  • Novaro, Marcos, and Vicente Palermo. 2003. La dictadura militar. 1976–1983. Buenos Aires: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oteiza, Enrique. 1992. La política de investigación científica y tecnológica en Argentina. Historias y perspectivas. Buenos Aires: CEAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, Nora. 2004. Las ciencias sociales durante la dictadura argentina (1976–1981). In La historiografía académica y la historiografía militante en Argentina y Uruguay, eds. Fernando Devoto, and Nora Pagano. Buenos Aires: Biblos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pallma, Sara. 1977. Un año en la educación. Universidad: marzo 1976/marzo 1977. Revista Perspectiva Universitaria, Nº2, April. Buenos Aires.

  • Perel, Pablo, Eduardo Raíces, and Martín Perel. 2006. Universidad y dictadura. Derecho, entre la liberación y el orden (1973/83). Buenos Aires: CCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez Lindo, Augusto. 1985. Universidad, política y sociedad. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, Luis. 1996. La historiografía argentina en la democracia: los problemas de la construcción de un campo professional. Revista Entrepasados, Year 5, Nbr. 10. Buenos Aires.

  • Thompson, Andrés. 1994. “Think Tanks” en la Argentina. Conocimiento, instituciones y política. Buenos Aires: CEDES.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO-PNUD. 1981. PNUD Report on Latin American Development and Education. Final Reports. Vol. 3.: Paris

  • Vessuri, Hebe. 1992. Las Ciencias sociales en la Argentina: diagnóstico y perspectivas. In La política de investigación científica y tecnológica en Argentina. Historias y perspectivas, ed. Enrique Oteiza. Buenos Aires: CEAL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, Gregorio. 1987. Aspectos del vaciamiento de la universidad Argentina durante los regímenes militares recientes. Revista Universidad y Política en América Latina. Mexico: UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

Archival sources

  • Boletín Oficial, 04/24/1980.

  • CONICET. 1978. Qué es, Qué hace, Cómo trabaja. Buenos Aires: CONICET.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONICET. 1980. Programa de desarrollo de Centros Regionales. BID-CONICET. Buenos Aires: CONICET.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONICET. 1982. Informe 1971–1981. Buenos Aires: CONICET.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONICET. 1983. Informe de las actividades 1976–1982. Buenos Aires: CONICET.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONICET. 1985. Boletín Informativo. Buenos Aires: CONICET.

    Google Scholar 

  • CONICET. 2006. 50° Aniversario 1958–2008, Book I. Buenos Aires: CONICET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Act Nbr. 21,276 (Boletín Oficial, 04/06/76).

  • Act Nbr. 22,207 (Boletín Oficial, 04/24/1980).

  • Argentina’s Ministry of Economy and Production, Economy Secretariat, National Budget Office. 2007. Sector Público Argentino No-Financiero-Cuenta ahorro-inversión-financiamiento-1961–2004. Buenos Aires.

  • CONICENT Resolution Nbr. 217, dated November 25, 1976.

  • Argentina’s Ministry of Culture and Education, Science and Technology Under Secretariat. 1981. Erogaciones para ciencia y tecnología en el presupuesto general de la administración nacional al inicio del ejercicio 1981. Buenos Aires.

  • Universidades Nacionales. Reseña Estadística. 1986. Working paper, National Department of University Affairs, University Documentation and Information Sector. Buenos Aires.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabiana Bekerman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bekerman, F. The Scientific Field During Argentina’s Latest Military Dictatorship (1976–1983): Contraction of Public Universities and Expansion of the National Council for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICET). Minerva 51, 253–269 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9227-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-013-9227-9

Keywords

Navigation