Aikenhead, Glen S. 1996. Science education: Border crossing into the subculture of science. Studies in Science Education 27(1): 1–52.
Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined communities. London: Verso.
BA 2002. Science in society. Advice to the Office of Science and Technology from the BA 2002 [cited 14 May 2010]. Available from http://www.britishscienceassociation.org/web/News/ReportsandPublications/Reports/Key_publications/_SIS_advice_to_OST.htm.
Bachelard, Gaston. 2001. The formation of the scientific mind. Manchester: Clinamen Press Ltd.
Badiou, Alain. 2006. Metapolitics. London: Verso.
Balibar, Étienne. 2004. We, the people of Europe? Princeton & Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Bandelli, Andrea, Elly A. Konijn, and Jaap W. Willems. 2009. The need for public participation in the governance of science centers. Museum Management and Curatorship 24(2): 89–104.
Barber, Benjamin. 1984. Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, Los Angeles & London: University of California Press.
Barnes, Barry, David Bloor, and John Henry. 1996. Scientific knowledge: A sociological analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Barton, Angela C. 2002. Urban science education: A commitment to equity, justice and a sense of place. Studies in Science Education 38(1): 1–38.
Bauer, Martin W., Nick Allum, and Steve Miller. 2007. What can we learn from 25 years of PUS survey research? Liberating and expanding the agenda. Public Understanding of Science 16(1): 79–95.
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity (trans: Ritter, M.). London: Sage.
Bensaude-Vincent, Bernadette. 2001. A genealogy of the increasing gap between science and the public. Public Understanding of Science 10(1): 99–113.
Bernstein, Basil. 2000. Pedagogy, symbolic control and identity. New York and Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.
BIS 2010. Science for all: Report and action plan from the science for all expert group (to the Dept for Business Innovation & Skills). Available from http://www.bis.gov.uk/assets/biscore/corporate/docs/s/science-for-all-report.pdf.
Bodmer, Walter F. 1986. The public understanding of science. London: Birkbeck College.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2004. Science of science and reflexivity. Cambridge: Polity.
Burchill, Kevin. 2007. UK governmental public dialogue on science and technology, 1998–2007: Consistency, hybridity and boundary work. In Paper presented to STEG group at King’s College London.
Burchill, Kevin, Sarah Franklin, and Kerry Holden. 2009. Public culture and professional science. London: BIOS.
Collins, Harry, and Robert Evans. 2002. The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science 32(2): 235–296.
Collins, Harry, and Trevor Pinch. 1998. The golem. What you should know about science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Council of the European Union. 2000. Conclusions of the Lisbon European Council. Council of the European Union SN 100/00: 23–24 Mar 2000.
Cunningham, Christine M., and Jenifer V. Helms. 1998. Sociology of science as a means to a more authentic, inclusive science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35(5): 483–499.
De Greiff, Pablo. 2000. Deliberative democracy and group representation. Social Theory and Practice 26(3): 397–415.
Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 2004. A thousand plateaus. London: Continuum.
DIUS 2008. A vision for science and society: A consultation on developing a new strategy for the UK 2008 [cited 15 Apr 2010]. Available from http://interactive.dius.gov.uk/scienceandsociety/files/A_Vision_for_Science_and_Society.pdf.
Dryzek, John. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Durodie, Bill. 2003. Limitations of public dialogue in science and the rise of new ‘experts’. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6(4): 82–92.
European Commission 2009. Global governance of science: Report of the expert group on global governance of science to the EU Science, Economy and Society Directorate [cited 22 July 2009]. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/global-governance-020609_en.pdf.
European Commission 2007. Taking European knowledge society seriously: Report to the European Commission. Directorate-General for Research [cited 22 July 2009]. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf.
Felt, Ulrike, and Maximilian Fochler. 2008. The bottom-up meanings of the concept of public participation in science and technology. Science and Public Policy 35(7): 489–499.
Fjaestad, Bjorn. 2007. Why journalists report science as they do. In Journalism, science and society, eds. M.W. Bauer, and M. Bucchi. New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
Foucault, Michel. 2002. Truth and power. In Power: The essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984, vol. 3, ed. J.D. Faubion. London: Penguin Books.
Frontier Economics. 2009. Assessing the impact of science centres in England. London: Frontier Economics Ltd.
Goldschmidt, Rüdiger, and Ortwin Renn. 2006. Meeting of minds—European citizens’ deliberation on brain sciences: Final report of the external evaluation 2006. Available from http://elib.uni-stuttgart.de/opus/volltexte/2007/3031/pdf/AB05_GoldschmidtRenn_EvaluationReport.pdf.
Goodin, Robert E. 2008. Innovating democracy: democratic theory and practice after the deliberative turn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gross, Alan. 1994. The roles of rhetoric in the public understanding of science. Public Understanding of Science 3(1): 3–23.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1970. The scientization of politics and public opinion. In Toward a rational society, ed. J. Shapiro. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1992. Further reflections on the public sphere. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. C. Calhoun. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between facts and norms (trans: Rehg, W.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hagendijk, Rob, and Alan Irwin. 2006. Public deliberation and governance: Engaging with science and technology in contemporary Europe. Minerva 44(2): 167–184.
Hendriks, Carolyn M. 2006. When the forum meets interest politics: Strategic uses of public deliberation. Politics and Society 34(4): 571–602.
HM Government in consultation with the Devolved Administrations 2005. The Government’s outline programme for public engagement on nanotechnologies [cited 23 Nov 2010]. Available from http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file27705.pdf.
HM Treasury, and DIUS 2007. Science and innovation investment framework 2004–2014, Annual Report 2007, [cited 23 Nov 2007]. Available from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file40538.pdf.
Holliman, R., R. Collins, E. Jensen, and P. Taylor. 2009. Isotope: Final report of the NESTA-funded project. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
House of Commons 2007. The governance of Britain (presented to Parliament by Secretary of State for Justice and Lord Chancellor). HMSO 2007. Available from http://www.official-documents.gov.uk/document/cm71/7170/7170.pdf.
Irwin, Alan. 2001. Constructing the scientific citizen: Science and democracy in the biosciences. Public Understanding of Science 10(1): 1–18.
Irwin, Alan. 2006. The politics of talk: Coming to terms with the ‘new’ scientific governance. Social Studies of Science 36(2): 299–320.
Irwin, Alan, and Brian Wynne. 1996. Introduction. In Misunderstanding science? The public reconstruction of science, eds. A. Irwin, and B. Wynne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41(3): 223–244.
Jasanoff, Sheila. 2005. Designs on nature. Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Kelly, Janet. 2000. Rethinking the elementary science methods course: A case for content, pedagogy and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education 22(7): 755–777.
Kerr, Anne, Sarah Cunningham-Burley, and Richard Tutton. 2007. Shifting subject positions: Experts and lay people in public dialogue. Social Studies of Science 37(3): 385–411.
Kitcher, Philip. 2001. Science, truth and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Knorr-Cetina, Karin. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Harvard: Harvard College.
Lehr, Jane. 2007. Democracy, scientific literacy and values in science education in the United States. In The re-emergence of values in science education, eds. D. Corrigan, J. Dillon, and R. Gunstone. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Lengwiler, Martin. 2008. Participatory approaches in science and technology. Science, Technology and Human Values 33(2): 186–200.
Logan, Robert A. 2001. Science mass communication: Its conceptual history. Science Communication 23(2): 135–163.
Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as social knowledge. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
McNeil, Maureen. 2007. Feminist cultural studies of science and technology. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Mesure, S. 2007. The CreScENDO project: Final Report. (Creative Science Engagement
Networking, Development and Organisation—Commissioned by NESTA (National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts); unpublished.
Michael, Mike. 2002. Comprehension, apprehension, prehension: Heterogeneity and the public understanding of science. Science, Technology and Human Values 27(3): 357–378.
Miller, Steve. 2001. Public understanding of science at the crossroads. Public Understanding of Science 10(1): 115–120.
Negri, Antonio. 2009. Insurgencies: Constituent power and the modern state, 2nd Revised ed. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
Nelkin, Dorothy. 1977. Technological decisions and democracy: European experiments in public participation. London: Sage.
Norris, Stepehen P. 1998. Intellectual independence for non-scientists and other content-transcendent goals of science education. Science Education 81(2): 239–258.
Norris, Christopher. 2005. Epistemology. London & New York: Continuum.
Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking science. Knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. Oxford and Malden: Policy Press.
Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2003. Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ revisited: the new production of knowledge. Minerva 41(3): 179–194.
OST 2003. The forward look: Government funded science, engineering & technology (Report by the Office of Science & Technology) 2003 [cited 15 Apr 2010]. Available from http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file30223.pdf.
Parkinson, John. 2006. Deliberating in the real world: Problems of legitimacy in deliberative democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pedretti, Erminia G. 2004. Perspectives on learning through research on critical issues-based science center exhibitions. Science Education 88(Suppl. 1): S34–S47.
Pedretti, Erminia G. 2007. Challenging convention and communicating controversy: Learning through issues-based museum exhibitions. In In principle, in practice: Museums as learning institutions, eds. J. Falk, L. Dierking, and S. Foutz. New York: AltaMira Press.
Popper, Karl. 2002. The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
POST 2006. Debating science 2006 [cited 15 Apr 2010]. Available from http://www.parliament.uk/documents/upload/postpn260.pdf.
PSCST 2000. Science and society [cited 22 July 2009]. Available from http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3802.htm.
Rancière, Jacques. 1991. The ignorant schoolmaster. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rancière, Jacques. 1995. On the shores of politics. London and New York: Verso.
Rancière, Jacques. 2004. Introducing disagreement. Angelaki 9(3): 3–9.
Rancière, Jacques. 2006. Democracy, republic, representation. Constellations 13(3): 297–307.
Rancière, Jacques. 2007. Hatred of democracy. London: Verso.
Rancière, Jacques. 2010. Dissensus: On politics and aesthetics. London and New York: Continuum.
RCUK 2008. Beacons for public engagement: Bridging the gap between higher education and the public 2008 [cited 15 Apr 2010]. Available from http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/cmsweb/downloads/rcuk/scisoc/beaconslaunch.pdf.
Rowe, Gene, Tom Horlick-Jones, John Walls, and Nick Pidgeon. 2005. Difficulties in evaluating public engagement initiatives: reflections on an evaluation of the UK GM Nation? Public debate about transgenic crops. Public Understanding of Science 14(4): 331–352.
Royal Society 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. London: The Royal Society.
Royal Society 2006. Science and the public interest: communicating the results of new scientific research to the public 2006 [cited 15 Apr 2010]. Available from http://royalsociety.org/Science-and-the-public-interest-communicating-the-results-of-new-scientific-research-to-the-public/.
Schmitter, Philippe. 1999. The future of democracy: Could it be a matter of scale? Social Research 66(3): 933–958.
Smith, Rogers M. 1997. Civic ideals: Conflicting visions of citizenship in US history. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Snively, Gloria, and John Consiglia. 2001. Discovering indigenous science: Implications for science education. Science Education 85(1): 6–34.
Stengers, Isabelle. 2000. Another look: Relearning to laugh. Hypatia: Journal of Feminist Philosophy 15(4): 41–54.
Stewart, Angus. 2002. Hope and despair: Making sense of politics in the twenty-first century. British Journal of Sociology 53(3): 467–490.
Stirling, Andy. 2008. “Opening up” and “closing down”: power, participation and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology and Human Values 33(2): 262–294.
Sturgis, Patrick, and Nick Allum. 2004. Science in society: Re-evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding of Science 13(1): 55–74.
The GM science review panel. 2004. GM science review .Second report [cited 23 Nov 2010]. Available from http://www.bis.gov.uk/files/file14992.pdf
Tlili, Anwar, Alan Cribb, and Sharon Gewirtz. 2006. What becomes of science in a science centre? Reconfiguring science for public consumption. Review of Education, Pedagogy and Cultural Studies 28(3): 203–228.
Trench, Brian. 2008. Towards an analytical framework of science communication models. In Communicating science in social contexts, eds. D. Cheng, M. Claessens, T. Gascoigne, J. Metcalfe, B. Schiele, and S. Shi. London: Springer.
Wagner, Wolfgang. 2007. Vernacular science knowledge: Its role in everyday life communication. Public Understanding of Science 16(7): 7–22.
Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and society (trans: Fischoff, E. et al.), eds. Roth, G., and Wittich, C., Vol. 1. New York: Bedminster Press.
Weber, Max. 2004. The essential Weber. ed Whimster, S. London: Routledge.
Weigold, Michael F. 2001. Communicating science: A review of the literature. Science Communication 23(2): 164–193.
Wilsdon, James, and Rebecca Willis. 2004. See-through science: Why public engagement needs to move upstream. London: Demos.
Woolgar, Steve. 1991. The turn to technology in social studies of science. Science, Technology and Human Values 16(1): 20–50.
Wright, Susan. 2008. Governance as a regime of discipline. In Exploring regimes of discipline, ed. N. Dyck. Oxford: Berghahn Books.
Wynne, Brian. 2006. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science—hitting the notes but missing the music? Community Genetics 9(3): 211–220.