Advertisement

Minerva

, 46:391 | Cite as

A Geohistorical Study of ‘The Rise of Modern Science’: Mapping Scientific Practice Through Urban Networks, 1500–1900

  • Peter J. Taylor
  • Michael HoylerEmail author
  • David M. Evans
Article

Abstract

Using data on the ‘career’ paths of one thousand ‘leading scientists’ from 1450 to 1900, what is conventionally called the ‘rise of modern science’ is mapped as a changing geography of scientific practice in urban networks. Four distinctive networks of scientific practice are identified. A primate network centred on Padua and central and northern Italy in the sixteenth century expands across the Alps to become a polycentric network in the seventeenth century, which in turn dissipates into a weak polycentric network in the eighteenth century. The nineteenth century marks a huge change of scale as a primate network centred on Berlin and dominated by German-speaking universities. These geographies are interpreted as core-producing processes in Wallerstein’s modern world-system; the rise of modern scientific practice is central to the development of structures of knowledge that relate to, but do not mirror, material changes in the system.

Keywords

Modern science Space of flows Scientists Scientific centres Scientific practice Urban Networks 

References

  1. Abbott, Carl. 1999. Political terrain: Washington, D.C., from tidewater town to global metropolis. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, John. 1999. Cities of power and influence: settled formations. In Unsettling cities, ed. John Allen, Doreen Massey, and Michael Pryke, 181–228. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Arrighi, Giovanni. 1994. The long twentieth century. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-David, Joseph. 1971. The scientist’s role in society: a comparative study. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Ben-David, Joseph, and Awraham Zloczower. 1962. Universities and academic systems in modern societies. Archives européennes de sociologie 3(1): 45–84.Google Scholar
  6. Brockliss, Laurence. 2000. Gown and town: the university and the city in Europe, 1200–2000. Minerva 38(2): 147–170. doi: 10.1023/A:1026596910667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Castells, Manuel. 1996. The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Davids, Karel. 2001. Amsterdam as a centre of learning in the Dutch Golden Age, c. 1580–1700. In Urban achievement in early modern Europe, ed. Patrick O’Brien, Derek Keene, Marjolein’t Hart, and Herman van der Wee, 305–325. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Eulenburg, Franz. 1908. Der “Akademische Nachwuchs”. Eine Untersuchung über die Lage und die Aufgaben der Extraordinarien und Privatdozenten. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
  10. Fifer, J.Valerie. 1981. Washington, DC: the political geography of a federal capital. Journal of American Studies 15(1): 5–26.Google Scholar
  11. Frijhoff, Willem. 1996. Patterns. In A history of the university in Europe, Volume II: universities in early modern Europe (1500–1800), ed. Hilde de Ridder-Symoens, 43–110. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gascoigne, Robert. 1984. A historical catalogue of scientists and scientific books from the earliest times to the close of the nineteenth century. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  13. Gascoigne, Robert. 1987. A chronology of the history of science, 1450–1900. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
  14. Gascoigne, Robert. 1992. The historical demography of the scientific community, 1450–1900. Social Studies of Science 22(3): 545–573. doi: 10.1177/0306312792022003005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology 78(6): 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, Steven J. 2006. Networks of travel, correspondence, and exchange. In The Cambridge history of science, Volume 3: early modern science, ed. Katharine Park, and Lorraine Daston, 341–362. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Jacobs, Jane. 1969. The economy of cities. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  19. Jöns, Heike. 2008. Academic travel from Cambridge University and the formation of centres of knowledge, 1885–1954. Journal of Historical Geography 34(2): 338–362. doi: 10.1016/j.jhg.2007.11.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Livingstone, David N. 2003. Putting science in its place: geographies of scientific knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  21. Livingstone, David N. 2005. Text, talk and testimony: geographical reflections on scientific habits. An afterword. British Journal for the History of Science 38(1): 93–100. doi: 10.1017/S000708740400648X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lux, David S., and Harold J. Cook. 1998. Closed circles or open networks?: communicating at a distance during the scientific revolution. History of Science 36(2): 179–211.Google Scholar
  23. Meusburger, Peter. 1990. Die regionale und soziale Rekrutierung der Heidelberger Professoren zwischen 1850 und 1932. In Bildungsgeographische Studien über Baden-Württemberg, ed. Peter Meusburger, and Jürgen Schmude, 187–239. Heidelberg: Geographisches Institut der Universität Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  24. Naylor, Simon. 2005. Introduction: historical geographies of science–places, contexts, cartographies. British Journal for the History of Science 38(1): 1–12. doi: 10.1017/S0007087404006430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Powell, Richard C. 2007. Geographies of science: histories, localities, practices, futures. Progress in Human Geography 31(3): 309–329. doi: 10.1177/0309132507077081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Riddle, Phyllis. 1993. Political authority and university formation in Europe, 1200–1800. Sociological Perspectives 36(1): 45–62.Google Scholar
  27. Sayer, Andrew. 1992. Method in social science: a realist approach. London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
  28. Schott, Thomas. 1993. The movement of science and of scientific knowledge: Joseph Ben-David’s contribution to its understanding. Minerva 31(4): 455–477. doi: 10.1007/BF01096450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Shapin, Steven. 2006. The man of science. In The Cambridge history of science, Volume 3: early modern science, ed. Katharine Park, and Lorraine Daston, 179–191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Shapin, Steven., and Arnold Thackray. 1974. Prosopography as a research tool in history of science: the British scientific community 1700–1900. History of Science 12(1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Taylor, Peter J. 2007. Space and sustainability: an exploratory essay on the production of social spaces through city-work. The Geographical Journal 173(3): 197–206. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2007.00241.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor, Peter J., Michael Hoyler, and Raf Verbruggen. 2008. External urban relational process: introducing central flow theory to complement central place theory. GaWC Research Bulletin 261.Google Scholar
  33. Thrift, Nigel. 1999. Cities and economic change: global governance? In Unsettling cities, ed. John Allen, Doreen Massey, and Michael Pryke, 271–320. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1974. The modern world-system: capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  35. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1980. The modern world-system II: mercantilism and the consolidation of the European world-economy, 1600–1750. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1984. The politics of the world economy. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1989. The modern world-system III: the second era of the great expansion of the capitalist world-economy, 1730–1840s. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  38. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1999. The end of the world as we know it: social science for the twenty first century. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  39. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004a. World-systems analysis: an introduction. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Wallerstein, Immanuel. 2004b. The uncertainties of knowledge. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter J. Taylor
    • 1
  • Michael Hoyler
    • 1
    Email author
  • David M. Evans
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyLoughborough UniversityLoughboroughUK

Personalised recommendations