Verification and Validation of Simulations Against Holism
- 51 Downloads
It has been argued that the Duhem problem is renewed with computational models since model assumptions having a representational aim and computational assumptions cannot be tested in isolation. In particular, while the Verification and Validation methodology is supposed to prevent such holism, Winsberg (Philos Compass 4:835–845, 2009; Science in the age of computer simulation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2010) argues that verification and validation cannot be separated in practice. Morrison (Reconstructing reality: models, mathematics, and simulations, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2015) replies that Winsberg overstates the entanglement between the steps. The paper aims at arbitrating these two positions, by stressing their respective validity in relation to domains of application. It importantly argues for an increasing use of formal methods in verification, that makes disentanglement possible.
KeywordsScientific models Computer simulations Verification and validation Duhem problem Holism Formal methods
We thank the guest editors Andreas Kaminski and Michael Resch, as well as to the two anonymous referees for their helpful comments. The paper has also benefited from conversations with audience members at the SPSP Conference in Ghent, and notably with Johannes Lenhard and Nic Fillion.
- Borälv, A., & Stalmarck, G. (1999). Formal verification in railways. In M. G. Hinchey & J. P. Bowe (Eds.), Industrial-strength formal methods in practice. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Bozzano, M., Bruintjes, H., Cimatti, A., Katoen, J.-P., Noll, T., & Tonetta, S. (2017). Formal methods for aerospace systems—Achievements and challenges. In S. Nakajima, J.-P. Talpin, M. Toyoshima, & H. Yu (Eds.), Cyber-Physical System Design from an Architecture Analysis Viewpoint (pp. 133–159). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Butler, R. W. (2001). What is formal methods? Last Updated: April 10, 2016. Consulted in January 2018. https://shemesh.larc.nasa.gov/fm/fm-what.html.
- Jackson, D. (2012). Software abstractions: Logic, language, and analysis. London: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Lions, J. L. (1996). Ariane 5 Flight 501 Failure. Ariane 501 Inquiry Board Report (p. 4).Google Scholar
- Oberkampf, W. L., & Trucano, T. G. (2002). Verification and validation in computational fluid dynamics. Rapport Sandia, SAND2002-0529.Google Scholar
- Rushby, J. (1995). Formal methods and their role in the certification of critical systems. Technical Report CSL-95-1, March 1995.Google Scholar
- Rushby, J. (2007). Automated formal methods enter the mainstream. Communications of the Computer Society of India, Formal Methods Theme Issue, 31(2), 28–32 (Archived in Journal of Universal Computer Science vol. 13, No. 5, pp. 650–660).Google Scholar
- Skeel, R. (1992). SIAM News (Vol. 25, No. 4). https://w3.ual.es/~plopez/docencia/itis/patriot.htm. Accessed 20 Nov 2018
- Trefethen, L. N. (1994). Finite difference and spectral methods for ordinary and partial differential equations, unpublished text. Available at http://people.maths.ox.ac.uk/trefethen/pdetext.html.
- Wiels, V., Delmas, R., Doose, D., Garoche, P. L., & Cazin, J. (2012). Formal verification of critical aerospace software. AerospaceLab, 4, 1.Google Scholar