Advertisement

Killer Robot Arms: A Case-Study in Brain–Computer Interfaces and Intentional Acts

  • David Gurney
Article

Abstract

I use a hypothetical case study of a woman who replaces here biological arms with prostheses controlled through a brain–computer interface the explore how a BCI might interpret and misinterpret intentions. I define pre-veto intentions and post-veto intentions and argue that a failure of a BCI to differentiate between the two could lead to some troubling legal and ethical problems.

Keywords

Brain–computer interface Veto Intentions 

References

  1. Bratman, M. (1984). Two faces of intention. Philosophical Review, 93(3), 375–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Friedman, B., & Kahn, P., Jr. (2003). Human values, ethics, and design. In J. Jacko & A. Sears (Eds.), The human–computer interaction handbook (pp. 1177–1201). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Gardener, J. (2012, December 18). Paralyzed mom controls robotic arm using her thoughts. ABC News. Retrieved from http://new.yahoo.com.
  4. Glannon, W. (2007). Bioethics and the brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Kass, L. et al. (2003). Beyond therapy: Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. Washington, DC: President’s Council on Bioethics.Google Scholar
  6. Klose, C. (2007). Connections that count: Brain–computer interface enables the profoundly paralyzed to communicate. NIH Medline Plus, 2(3), 20–21.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. Long, J., Li, Y., Yu, T., et al. (2012). Hybrid brain–computer interface to control the direction and speed of a simulated or real wheelchair. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 20(5), 720–729.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Mason, S., & Birch, G. (2003). A general framework for brain–computer interface design. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 11(1), 70–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mele, A. (2008). Proximal intentions, intention-reports, and vetoing. Philosophical Psychology, 21(1), 1–14.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Sunny, T. D., Aparna, T., Neethu, P., et al. (2016). Robotic arm with brain–computer interface. Procedia Techology, 24, 1089–1096.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Vallabhaneni, A., Wong, T., & He, B. (2005). Brain–computer interface. In B. He (Ed.), Neuronal engineering (pp. 85–121). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. van de Laar, B., Gurkok, H., & Plass-Oude Bos, D. (2013). Experiencing BCI control in a popular computer game. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 5(2), 176–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wan, W. (2017, November 15). New robotic hand named after Luke Skywalker helps amputee touch and feel again. Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.James E. Rogers College of LawUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations