Towards a Cognitive Neuroscience of Intentionality
- 423 Downloads
We situate the debate on intentionality within the rise of cognitive neuroscience and argue that cognitive neuroscience can explain intentionality. We discuss the explanatory significance of ascribing intentionality to representations. At first, we focus on views that attempt to render such ascriptions naturalistic by construing them in a deflationary or merely pragmatic way. We then contrast these views with staunchly realist views that attempt to naturalize intentionality by developing theories of content for representations in terms of information and biological function. We echo several other philosophers by arguing that these theories over-generalize unless they are constrained by a theory of the functional role of representational vehicles. This leads to a discussion of the functional roles of representations, and how representations might be realized in the brain. We argue that there’s work to be done to identify a distinctively mental kind of representation. We close by sketching a way forward for the project of naturalizing intentionality. This will not be achieved simply by ascribing the content of mental states to generic neural representations, but by identifying specific neural representations that explain the puzzling intentional properties of mental states.
KeywordsIntentionality Representation Cognitive neuroscience Mechanisms
Thanks to Anne Jacobson, Jonathan Kaplan, Nelson Mauro Maldonado, Marcin Miłkowski, Alessio Plebe, Michael Schmitz, Leonardo Wykrota, and two anonymous referees for helpful comments. This material is partially based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. SES-1654982.
- Anscombe, E. (1957). Intention. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Bechtel, W. (2008). Mental mechanisms. New York: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Bechtel, W., & Richardson, R. (2010). Discovering complexity: Decomposition and localization as strategies in scientific research. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Bourget, D., and Mendelovici, A. (2017). Phenomenal intentionality. In Edward N. Zalta (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), forthcoming https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/phenomenal-intentionality/.
- Brentano, F. (1874 ). Psychology from an empirical standpoint. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Caston, V. (2008). Intentionality in ancient philosophy. In E. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2008 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2008/entries/intentionality-ancient/.
- Chisholm, R. (1957). Perceiving: A philosophical study. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Craik, K. (1943). The nature of explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Cummins, R. (1983). The nature of psychological explanation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Cummins, R. (1989). Meaning and mental representation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Cummins, R. (1996). Representations, targets, and attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Davidson, D. (1980). Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
- Dennett, D. (1978). Artificial intelligence as philosophy and as psychology. In his ‘Brainstorms’ (pp. 109–126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dennett, D. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dretske, F. (1986). Misrepresentation. In R. Bogdan (Ed.), Form, content, and function (pp. 157–173). Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
- Dretske, F. (1988). Explaining behavior: Reasons in a world of causes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Eliasmith, C., & Anderson, C. (2003). Neural engineering: Computation, Representation, and dynamics in neurobiological systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Fodor, J. (1975). The language of thought. New York, NY: Crowell.Google Scholar
- Fodor, J. (1987). Psychosemantics: The problem of meaning in the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Fodor, J. (1990). A theory of content and other essays. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Grush, R. (2004). The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(3), 377–396.Google Scholar
- Grush, R. (2008). Representation reconsidered by William M. Ramsey, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.Google Scholar
- Harman, G. (1973). Thought. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Harman, G. (1987). (Non-solipsistic) conceptual role semantics. In E. Lepore (Ed.), New directions in semantics. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Harman, G. (1988). Wide functionalism. In S. Schiffer & S. Steele (Eds.), Cognition and representation. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
- Hebb, D. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Horgan, T., & Tienson, J. (2002). The intentionality of phenomenology and the phenomenology of intentionality. In D. Chalmers (Ed.), Philosophy of mind: Classical and contemporary readings (pp. 520–933). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Hutto, D., & Myin, E. (2013). Radicalizing enactivism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Jacob, P., (2014). “Intentionality”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2014 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2014/entries/intentionality/.
- Kriegel, U. (Ed.). (2013). Phenomenal intentionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Loar, B. (1981). Mind and meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Loar, B. (2003). Phenomenal intentionality as the basis of mental content. In M. Hahn & B. Ramberg (Eds.), Reflections and replies: Essays on the philosophy of Tyler Burge (pp. 229–258). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Locke, J. (1824 ). The works of John Locke (Vol. 3, 12th Ed.). Rivington: London.Google Scholar
- Millikan, R. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Millikan, R. (1993). White queen psychology and other essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Millikan, R. (2000). Naturalizing intentionality. The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy, 9, 83–90.Google Scholar
- O’Brien, G., & Opie, J. (2004). Notes toward a structuralist theory of mental representation. In H. Clapin, P. Staines, & P. Slezac (Eds.), Representation in mind (pp. 1–20). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Piccinini, G. (forthcoming). Nonnatural mental representation. In K. Dolega, T. Schlicht, J. Smortchkova (Eds.), What are mental representations? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Pitt, D. (2017). “Mental Representation”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2017 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), forthcoming https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2017/entries/mental-representation/.
- Pylyshyn, Z. (1984). Computation and cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Samsonovich, A., & McNaughton, B. (1997). Path Integration and cognitive mapping in a continuous attractor neural network model. Journal of Neuroscience, 17(15), 5900–5920.Google Scholar
- Sellars, W. (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 1(19), 253–329.Google Scholar
- Stich, S. (1983). From folk psychology to cognitive science: The case against belief. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Tye, M. (1995). Ten problems of consciousness: A representational theory of the phenomenal mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar