The Internet, Cognitive Enhancement, and the Values of Cognition
- 1.5k Downloads
This paper has two distinct but related goals: (1) to identify some of the potential consequences of the Internet for our cognitive abilities and (2) to suggest an approach to evaluate these consequences. I begin by outlining the Google effect, which (allegedly) shows that when we know information is available online, we put less effort into storing that information in the brain. Some argue that this strategy is adaptive because it frees up internal resources which can then be used for other cognitive tasks, whereas others argue that this is maladaptive because it makes us less knowledgeable. I argue that the currently available empirical evidence in cognitive psychology does not support strong conclusions about the negative effects of the Internet on memory. Before we can make value-judgements about the cognitive effects of the Internet, we need more robust and ecologically-valid evidence. Having sketched a more nuanced picture of the Google effect, I then argue that the value of our cognitive abilities is in part intrinsic and in part instrumental, that is, they are both valuable in themselves and determined by the socio-cultural context in which these cognitive abilities are utilised. Focussing on instrumental value, I argue that, in an information society such as ours, having the skills to efficiently navigate, evaluate, compare, and synthesize online information are (under most circumstances) more valuable than having a lot of facts stored in biological memory. This is so, partly because using the Internet as an external memory system has overall benefits for education, navigation, journalism, and academic scholarship.
KeywordsInternet Google effect External memory Cognitive enhancement Cognitive technology Values and information technology Information ethics
I wish to thank Neil Levy for helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. Ideas in this paper have been presented at the Third International Conference on Interactivity, Language and Cognition in London; the International Association of Philosophy and Computing Conference in Ferrara; and at a departmental seminar at the philosophy department of Macquarie University. I would like the audiences for their thoughtful comments and suggestions. Lastly, I want to thank the two anonymous reviewers, whose comments significantly improved the article.
- Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (1999). Remediation: Understanding new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Borgman, C. L. (2007). Scholarship in the digital age: Information, infrastructure and the Internet. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Bostrom, N., & Roache, R. (2011). Smart policy: Cognitive enhancement and the public interest. In J. Savulescu, R. ter Meulen, & G. Kahane (Eds.), Enhancing human capabilities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Buchanan, A. (2011). Better than human: The promise and perils of enhancing ourselves. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brain. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
- Carter, J. A., & Pritchard, D. (forthcoming). The epistemology of cognitive enhancement. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. Google Scholar
- Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Consalvo, M., & Ess, C. (Eds.). (2011). The handbook of internet studies. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Donald, M. (1991). Origins of the modern mind: Three stages in the evolution of our cognitive system. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Dourish, P. (2001). Where the action Is: The foundations of embodied interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Dutton, W. H. (Ed.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of internet studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Floridi, L. (2014). The fourth revolution: How the infosphere is reshaping human reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Goldman, A. I. (2008). The social epistemology of blogging. In J. van den Hoven & J. Weckert (Eds.), Information technology and moral philosophy (pp. 111–122). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Greenfield, S. (2014). Mind change: How digital technologies are leaving their mark on our brains. London: Rider Books.Google Scholar
- Greengard, S. (2015). The internet of things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Hirsch, F. (1977). Social limits to growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- Lynch, M. (2016). The internet of us: Knowing more and understanding less in the age of big data. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.Google Scholar
- Plato. (1925). Phaedrus (H. N. Fowler, Trans.). Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Rheingold, H. (2012). Net smart: How to thrive online. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Sacks, O. (1985). The man who mistook his wife for a hat and other clinical tales. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
- Smart, P. (2014). Embodiment, cognition, and the world wide web. In L. Shapiro (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of embodied cognition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Smart, P., Heersmink, R., & Clowes, R. (2017). The cognitive ecology of the Internet. In S. Cowley & F. Vallée-Tourangeau (Eds.), Cognition beyond the brain: Computation, interactivity and human artifice (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
- Smart, P., & Shadbolt, N. (forthcoming). The world wide web. In J. Chase & D. Coady (Eds.), Routledge handbook of applied epistemology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Sparrow, B., & Chatman, L. (2013a). Social cognition in the internet age: Same as it ever was? Psychological Inquiry, 24(4), 272–292.Google Scholar
- Stahl, B. C., et al. (2010b). Issues, concepts and methods relating to the identification of the ethics of emerging ICTs. Communications of the International Information Management Association, 10(1), 33–43.Google Scholar
- Sullins, J. (2012). Information technology and moral values. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/it-moral-values/.
- Tavani, H. (2012). Search engines and ethics. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-search/.
- Thompson, C. (2013). Smarter than you think: How technology is changing our minds for the better. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
- Van den Hoven, J. (2007). ICT and value sensitive design. In P. Goujon, S. Lavelle, P. Duquenoy, K. Kimppa, & V. Laurent (Eds.), The information society: Innovation, legitimacy, ethics and democracy. Boston: Springer.Google Scholar
- Zimmerman, M. (2014). Intrinsic vs. extrinsic value. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/value-intrinsic-extrinsic/.