Minds and Machines

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 415–438 | Cite as

Varieties of Analog and Digital Representation

Article

Abstract

The ‘received view’ of the analog–digital distinction holds that analog representations are continuous while digital representations are discrete. In this paper I first provide support for the received view by showing how it (1) emerges from the theory of computation, and (2) explains engineering practices. Second, I critically assess several recently offered alternatives, arguing that to the degree they are justified they demonstrate not that the received view is incorrect, but rather that distinct senses of the terms have become entrenched specific fields, perhaps most notably in the cognitive psychology of mental imagery.

Keywords

Mental representation Analog representation Digital representation Computation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Corey Maley and two anonymous reviewers for valuable comments on an earlier draft of this paper, and to Bill Schonbein for teaching me how to use a slide rule.

References

  1. Argawal, A., & Lang, J. H. (2005). Foundations of analog and digital electronic circuits. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  2. Blum, L., Shub, M., & Smale, S. (1989). On a theory of computation and complexity over the real numbers: NP-completeness, recursive functions and universal machines. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 21(1), 1–46.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. Bournez, O., & Campagnolo, M. L. (2008). A survey on continuous time computations. In: S.B. Cooper, B. Lowe, A. Sorbi. (Eds.), New computational paradigms: Changing conceptions of what is computable (pp. 383–423). New York:Springer.Google Scholar
  4. Church, A. (1936). An unsolvable problem of elementary number theory. American Journal of Mathematics, 58, 245–363.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  5. Clymer, A. B. (1993). The mechanical analog computers of Hannibal Ford and William Newell. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 15(2), 19–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gallistel, C. R., Gelman, R., & Cordes, S. (2006). The cultural and evolutionary history of the real numbers. In S. Levinson & P. Jaisson (Eds.), Culture and evolution (pp. 247–273). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Goodman, N. (1968). Languages of art. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  8. Haugeland, J. (1981). Analog and analog. Philosophical Topics, 12, 213–225 [Page references are to the reprint appearing in Haugeland (1998)].Google Scholar
  9. Haugeland, J. (1998). Having thought: Essays in the metaphysics of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hopcroft, J. E., & Ullman, J. D. (1979). Introduction to automata theory, languages, and computation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Horgan, T., & Tienson, J. (1996). Connectionism and the philosophy of psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Howe, H. S. (1981). TRS-80 assembly language. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  13. Katz, M. (2008). Analog and digital representation. Minds and Machines, 18, 403–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Koiran, P. (1994). Computing over the reals with addition and order. Theoretical Computer Science, 133, 35–47.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Lewis, D. (1971). Analog and digital. Noûs, 5(3), 321–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Maley, C. (2011). Analog and digital, continuous and discrete. Philosophical Studies, 155, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Post, E. L. (1936). Finite combinatory processes. Formulation I. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1, 103–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pylyshyn, Z. (1981). The imagery debate: Analogue media versus tacit knowledge. Psychological Review, 88, 16–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Sarpeshkar, R. (1998). Analog versus digital: Extrapolating from electronics to neurobiology. Neural Computation, 10, 1601–1638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Schonbein, W. (2005). Cognition and the power of continuous dynamical systems. Minds and Machines, 15(1), 57–71. Google Scholar
  21. Searle, J. R. (1990). Is the brain a digital computer? Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 64, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Shepard, R. N. (1978). The mental image. American Psychologist, 33, 125–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Siegelmann, H. T., & Sontag, E. D. (1994). Analog computation via neural networks. Theoretical Computer Science, 131, 331–360.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  24. Turing, A. M. (1936). On computable numbers, with an application to the Entscheidungsproblem. Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society, 42(series 2), 230–256.Google Scholar
  25. Van Gelder, T. (1995). What might cognition be, if not computation? Journal of Philosophy, 91(7), 345–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA

Personalised recommendations