The ERI-Designer: A Computer Model for the Arrangement of Furniture

Abstract

This paper reports a computer program to generate novel designs for the arrangement of furniture within a simulated room. It is based on the engagement-reflection computer model of the creative processes. During engagement the system generates material in the form of sequences of actions (e.g. change the colours of the walls, include some furniture in the room, modify their colour, and so on) guided by content and knowledge constraints. During reflection, the system evaluates the composition produced so far and, if it is necessary, modifies it. We discuss the implementation of the system and some of its most salient features, especially the use of a computational model for creativity in the terrain of design. We argue that this kind of model opens new possibilities for the simulation of the design processes as well as the development of tools.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

References

  1. Balling, J. D., & Falkin, J. H. (1982). Development of visual preference for natural environments. Environment and Behavior, 1, 5–28.

  2. Coyne, R. D., Newton, S., & Sudweeks, F. (1993). A connectionist view of creative design reasoning. In J. S. Gero & M. L. Maher (Eds.), Modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design (pp. 177–209). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Hilsdale.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fehrman, K. R., & Fehrman C. (2004). Color. The secret influence. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gelernter, D. (1994). The muse in the machine. London: Fourth Estate.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gero, J. (1985). Expert systems in CAD, Computer-Aided Design (Vol. 17, Issue 9). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  6. Gómez de Silva, A., & Zamora, A. (2004). A cognitive evaluation of a computer system for a generative mondrian-like artwork. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Design computing and cognition 04 (pp. 79–96). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Greene, J., & d’Oliveira, M. (1981). Methodology handbook. UK: The Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Janssen, P., Frazer, J., & Tang, M. (2002). Evolutionary systems and generative processes, Applied Intelligence (Vol. 16, pp. 119–128). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kellert, S. R. (1993). The biological basis for human values of nature. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Laurier, E. (2008a). Drinking up endings: Conversational resources of the cafe. Language and Communication, 28(2), 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Laurier, E. (2008b). How breakfast happens in the cafe. Time and Society, 17(1), 119–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewis, M., & Haviland-Jones, J. M. (2004). Handbook of emotions, (2nd ed). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lidwel, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2005). Principios Univerales del Diseño (original title: Universal Principles of Design), BLUME, Barcelona.

  14. Maher, M. L. (1985). HI-RISE and beyond: Directions for expert systems in design, Computer-Aided Design (Vol. 17, Issue 9). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

  15. Maher, M. L., Fenves, S. J., & Garrett, J. H. (1988). Expert systems for structural design. In H. Adeli (Ed.), Expert systems in construction and structural engineering. London: Chapman and Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mahnke, F. H. (1996). Color, environment, and human response. New York: Wiley

    Google Scholar 

  17. Michalewicz, Z. (1999). Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolutionary programs. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Pérez y Pérez, R. (2007). Employing emotions to drive plot generation in a computer-based storyteller. Cognitive Systems Research, 8(2), 89–109. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2006.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pérez y Pérez, R., & Sharples, M. (2001). MEXICA: A computer model of a cognitive account of creative writing. Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence, 13(2), 119–139.

    MATH  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pullman, M. E., & Gross, M. A. (2004). Ability of experience design elements to elicit emotions and loyalty behaviors. Decision Sciences, 35(3), 551–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Puybaret, E. (2009). Sweet home 3d. http://www.sweethome3d.eu.

  22. Ritterfeld, U. (2002). Social heuristics in interior design preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Whitemyer D. (2009). Anthropology in design. http://www.iida.org/content.cfm/anthropology-in-design.

  24. Woodbury, R. F. (1993). A genetic approach to creative design. In J. S. Gero & M. L. Maher (Eds.), Modeling creativity and knowledge-based creative design (pp. 211–233). New Jersey: Hilsdale, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Pérez y Pérez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pérez y Pérez, R., Aguilar, A. & Negrete, S. The ERI-Designer: A Computer Model for the Arrangement of Furniture. Minds & Machines 20, 533–564 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-010-9208-9

Download citation

Keywords

  • Computational creativity
  • Engagement-reflection
  • Design
  • Furniture arrangement