Advertisement

Minds and Machines

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 353–356 | Cite as

Walter J. Freeman, How Brains Make Up their Minds

Columbia University Press, New York, 2001, 180 pp, $28.95, ISBN 0-297-84257-9
  • Stan FranklinEmail author
Article

The oft repeated claim that the human brain is the most complex system in the universe has always struck me as far fetched and presumptuous. Isn’t it part of an even more complex system, the human body? And, how can we know what’s in this vast universe, of which our solar system is only a molecule. Nonetheless, the human brain is certainly awesome in its complexity, and the mind, on reflection, hardly less so. How can we make sense of brain and mind?

During the “decade of the brain” many authors have attempted to help. Psychologist Bernard Baars told us of “The Theater of Consciousness” (1997), philosopher David Chalmers of “The Conscious Mind” (1996), neurologist Antonio Damasio of “The Feeling of What Happens” (1999), bio-anthropologist Terrence Deacon about “The Symbolic Species” (1997), neuroscientists Gerald Edelman and Giulio Tononi of “A Universe of Consciousness” (2000), evolutionist Nicholas Humphrey about “How to Solve the Mind Body Problem” (2000), cognitive scientist...

References

  1. Baars, B. J. (1997). In the theater of consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Chalmers, D. J. (1996). The conscious mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. Damasio, A. R. (1999). The feeling of what happens. New York: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  4. Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Edelman, G. M. (1987). Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  6. Edelman, G. M., & Tononi, G. (2000). A universe of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  7. Franklin, S. (1995). Artificial minds. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Franklin, S., & Graesser, A. C. (1997) Is it an agent, or just a program?: A taxonomy for autonomous agent’s in intelligent agents III. Berlin: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
  9. Freeman, W. J. (1975). Mass action in the nervous system. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Freeman, W. J., & Rogers, L. J. (2003). A neurobiological theory of meaning in perception part V: Multicortical patterns of phase modulation in gamma EEG. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 13, 2867–2888.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Humphrey, N. (2000). How to solve the mind-body problem. Bowling Green, OH: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
  12. Kozma, R. (2001). Fragmented attractor boundaries in the KIII model of sensory information processing—evidence of Cantor encoding in cognitive processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 820–821.Google Scholar
  13. Kozma, R., & Freeman, W. J. (2001). Chaotic resonance—methods and applications for robust classification of noisy and variable patterns. International Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos, 11, 1607–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kozma, R., Freeman, W. J., & Erdi, P. (2003). The KIV Model—nonlinear spatio-temporal dynamics of the primordial vertebrate forebrain. Neurocomputing, 52–54, 819–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Oyama, S. (1985) The ontogeny of information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Pinker, S. (1997). How the mind works, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  17. Rolls, E. T. (1999). The brain and emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Skarda, C., & Freeman, W. J. (1987). How brains make chaos in order to make sense of the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 161–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, Institute for Intelligent SystemsThe University of MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations