Skip to main content
Log in

The issue of being touched

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this empirical paper is to shed light on the phenomenon of being touched in professional care practice. The study has a qualitative design and is a phenomenological hermeneutical exploration based on the story of a care provider. In her story, she describes how her interactions with a substance abuser touched her. The narrative data stems from dialogue with her colleagues and demonstrates a moral appeal and challenge in practical care. Investigations reveal that being touched is about allowing one’s self to be awakened by the suffering of others. Being touched by others’ suffering thus provides the ability “to see” what is at stake. Identifying with one’s suffering and the awareness of what is at risk may be factors that “tip” a person’s decision toward acting in the best interest of another person. Being touched may muster an individual’s courage to engage in “risk-taking” actions in care. This process paves the way to care and represent essential practical knowledge for health care professionals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern, J., J. Stuber, and S. Galea. 2007. Stigma, discrimination and the health of illicit drug users. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 88(2–3): 188–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alvsvåg, H. 2014. Kari Martinsen: Philosophy of caring. In Nursing theorists and their work, ed. Martha R. Alligood, 147–170. St. Louis, MO: Mosby Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, S. 1996. K. E. Løgstrups etik. In Nærhetsetikk [Caring ethics], ed. A.J. Vetlesen, 50–100. Oslo: Ad Notam Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blum, L. 1991. Moral perception and particularity. Ethics 101(4): 701–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornemark, J. 2014. The genesis of empathy in human development: A phenomenological reconstruction. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 17(2): 259–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. 2011. Case study. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, ed. Norman K. Denzin, and Yvonna S. Lincoln, 301–316. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, C. 2015. Understanding empathy: Why phenomenology and hermeneutics can help medical education and practice. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18(4): 541–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, S.F., and J. Morse. 2014. The praxis of courage as a foundation for care. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 46(4): 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Håkansson, J., and H. Montgomery. 2003. Empathy as an interpersonal phenomenon. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 20: 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaebnick, G.E. 2008. Reasons of the hearth: Emotion, rationality and the ‘wisdom of repugnance’. Hastings Center Report 38(4): 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindseth, A. 2014. Svarevne og kritisk refleksjon—Hvordan utvikle praktisk kunnskap? [Responding and critical reflection—How to develop practical knowledge?]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindseth, A., and A. Norberg. 2004. A phenomenological hermeneutical method for researching lived experience. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science 18: 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Løgstrup, K.E. 2007. Beyond the ethical demand. Notre Dame, US: University of Notre Dame Press. http://site.ebrary.com/lib/hbobib/detail.action?docID=10423376.

  • Machert, M., E.E. Donovan, A. Mabry, M. Guadagno, and P.A. Stout. 2014. Stigma and health literacy: An agenda for advancing research and practice. American Journal of Health Behavior 38(5): 690–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinsen, K. 1990. Omsorg i sykepleien—En moralsk utfordring [Caring in nursing—A moral challenge]. In Moderne omsorgsbilder [Modern caring pictures], ed. Karen Jensen, 61–94. Oslo: Gyldendal.

  • Martinsen, K. 2000. Øyet og kallet [Eye and call]. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Methi, J.S. 2015. The border zone as an arena for exeeding oneself. In Philosophy in the border zone, ed. Viggo Rossvær, and Andrey Sergeev, 212–220. Stamsund: Orkana Akademisk.

    Google Scholar 

  • NIDA. 2015. National institute on drug abuse. The science of drug abuse and addiction. https://www.drugabuse.gov/related-topics/trends-statistics/infographics/drug-alcohol-use-significant-risk-factor-hiv. Lokated 27 October 2015.

  • Online Etymology Dictionary. http://www.etymonline.com/.

  • Schantz, M.L. 2007. Compassion: A concept analysis. Nursing Forum 42(2): 48–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sleeper, J.A., and S.S. Bochain. 2013. Stigmatization by nurses as perceived by substance abuse patients: A phenomenological study. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice 3(7): 92–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. 1987. Collins COBUILD english language dictionary. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1991. The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorup, C.B., E. Rundqvist, C. Roberts, and C. Delmar. 2012. Care as a matter of courage: Vulnerability, suffering and ethical formation in nursing care. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Science 26: 427–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Boekel, L.C., E.P.M. Brouwers, J. van Weeghel, and H.F.L. Garretsen. 2013. Stigma among health professionals towards patients with substance use disorders and its consequences for healthcare delivery: Systematic review. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 131(1/2): 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite, L.A. 2011. What is it they say about best intentions? A life lesson in empathy and sympathy. Health Communication 26(4): 389–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Betty-Ann Solvoll.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was conducted according to the Law on Research Ethics and followed the key principle that all participation in research should be voluntary and that participants must provide their written consent. The study was registered with the Norwegian Social Sciences Data Service and was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics. All procedures performed in the study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the regional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Solvoll, BA., Lindseth, A. The issue of being touched. Med Health Care and Philos 19, 299–306 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-015-9682-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-015-9682-1

Keywords

Navigation