Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 253–260

Preserving children’s fertility: two tales about children’s right to an open future and the margins of parental obligations

Scientific Contribution

DOI: 10.1007/s11019-014-9596-3

Cite this article as:
Cutas, D. & Hens, K. Med Health Care and Philos (2015) 18: 253. doi:10.1007/s11019-014-9596-3


The sources, extent and margins of parental obligations in taking decisions regarding their children’s medical care are subjects of ongoing debates. Balancing children’s immediate welfare with keeping their future open is a delicate task. In this paper, we briefly present two examples of situations in which parents may be confronted with the choice of whether to authorise or demand non-therapeutic interventions on their children for the purpose of fertility preservation. The first example is that of children facing cancer treatment, and the second of children with Klinefelter syndrome. We argue that, whereas decisions of whether to preserve fertility may be prima facie within the limits of parental discretion, the right to an open future does not straightforwardly put parents under an obligation to take actions that would detect or relieve future infertility in their children—and indeed in some cases taking such actions is problematic.


Fertility Klinefelter syndrome Cancer Right to an open future Right to genetic privacy Screening Fertility preservation 

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Historical, Philosophical and Religious StudiesUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of ScienceUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  3. 3.Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life SciencesMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental BiologyMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations