Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 18, Issue 2, pp 253–260 | Cite as

Preserving children’s fertility: two tales about children’s right to an open future and the margins of parental obligations

  • Daniela CutasEmail author
  • Kristien Hens
Scientific Contribution


The sources, extent and margins of parental obligations in taking decisions regarding their children’s medical care are subjects of ongoing debates. Balancing children’s immediate welfare with keeping their future open is a delicate task. In this paper, we briefly present two examples of situations in which parents may be confronted with the choice of whether to authorise or demand non-therapeutic interventions on their children for the purpose of fertility preservation. The first example is that of children facing cancer treatment, and the second of children with Klinefelter syndrome. We argue that, whereas decisions of whether to preserve fertility may be prima facie within the limits of parental discretion, the right to an open future does not straightforwardly put parents under an obligation to take actions that would detect or relieve future infertility in their children—and indeed in some cases taking such actions is problematic.


Fertility Klinefelter syndrome Cancer Right to an open future Right to genetic privacy Screening Fertility preservation 



Part of this work was supported by the Centre for Society and Life Sciences, and the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (research grant “Artificial gametes: dynamics and ethics”, at Maastricht University, now completed), and part by the Swedish Research Council (research grant “Close personal relationships, children and the family: ethical and political analysis against a changing background”, at Umeå University).


  1. Bauer, D., et al. 1980. Special supplement: The XYY controversy: Researching violence and genetics. The Hastings Center Report 10(4): 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. BBC News, Ovarian transplant first welcomed. August 2, 2007. Last accessed August 2014.
  3. Bizet, P., et al. 2012. Sperm cryopreservation before cancer treatment: A 15-year monocentric experience. Reproductive biomedicine online 24(3): 321–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borelli, J., et al. 1984. The meaning of early knowledge of a child’s infertility in families with 47, XXY and 45, X children. Child Psychiatry and Human Development 14(4): 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borry, P., et al. 2014. Is there a right time to know? The right not to know and genetic testing in children. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 42(1): 19–27.Google Scholar
  6. Borry, P., et al. 2009. Genetic testing in asymptomatic minors: Background considerations towards ESHG recommendations. European Journal of Human Genetics 17(6): 711–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourke, E., et al. 2014. A qualitative exploration of mothers’ and fathers’ experiences of having a child with Klinefelter syndrome and the process of reaching this diagnosis. European Journal of Human Genetics 22(18): 24.Google Scholar
  8. Cobo, A., and C. Diaz. 2011. Clinical application of oocyte vitrification: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Fertility and Sterility 96(2): 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cobo, A., et al. 2013. Is vitrification of oocytes useful for fertility preservation for age-related fertility decline and in cancer patients? Fertility and Sterility 99(6): 1485–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Davis, D.S. 2010. Genetic dilemmas: Reproductive technology, parental choices, and children’s futures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Dittrich, R., et al. 2012. Live birth after ovarian tissue autotransplantation following overnight transportation before cryopreservation. Fertility and Sterility 97(2): 387–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Donnez, J., et al. 2011. Pregnancy and live birth after autotransplantation of frozen-thawed ovarian tissue in a patient with metastatic disease undergoing chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Fertility and Sterility 95(5): 1787 e1781–1784.Google Scholar
  13. Edgar, D.H., and D.A. Gook. 2012. A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos. Human reproduction update 18(5): 536–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fallat, M.E., and J. Hutter. 2008. Preservation of fertility in pediatric and adolescent patients with cancer. Pediatrics 121(5): e1461–e1469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Feinberg, J. 1980. The child’s right to an open future. In Whose Child? Children’s rights, parental authority, and state power, ed. W. Aiken, and H. LaFollette. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  16. Feinberg, J. 1992. Freedom and fulfilment: Philosophical essays. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fujita, K., et al. 2005. Transplantation of spermatogonial stem cells isolated from leukemic mice restores fertility without inducing leukemia. The Journal of Clinical Investigation 115(7): 1855–1861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fullerton, G., et al. 2010. Should non-mosaic Klinefelter syndrome men be labelled as infertile in 2009? Human Reproduction 25(3): 588–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gies, I., et al. 2012. Spermatogonial stem cell preservation in boys with Klinefelter syndrome: to bank or not to bank, that’s the question. Fertility and Sterility 98(2): 284–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goossens, E., et al. 2013. Spermatogonial stem cell preservation and transplantation: From research to clinic. Human Reproduction 28(4): 897–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Grundy, R., et al. 2001a. Fertility preservation for children treated for cancer (1): Scientific advances and research dilemmas. Archives of Disease in Childhood 84(4): 355–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grundy, R., et al. 2001b. Fertility preservation for children treated for cancer (2): Ethics of consent for gamete storage and experimentation. Archives of Disease in Childhood 84(4): 360–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hayashi, K., et al. 2012. Offspring from oocytes derived from in vitro primordial germ cell-like cells in mice. Science 338(6109): 971–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hayashi, K., et al. 2011. Reconstitution of the mouse germ cell specification pathway in culture by pluripotent stem cells. Cell 146(4): 519–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Heindryckx, B., et al. 2007. Embryo development after successful somatic cell nuclear transfer to in vitro matured human germinal vesicle oocytes. Human Reproduction 22(7): 1982–1990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hens, K., et al. 2011. The return of individual research findings in paediatric genetic research. Journal of Medical Ethics 37(3): 179–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hens, K., et al. 2013. Developing a policy for paediatric biobanks: Principles for good practice. European Journal of Human Genetics 21(1): 2–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Herlihy, A.S., et al. 2011. Postnatal screening for Klinefelter syndrome: Is there a rationale? Acta Paediatrica 100(6): 923–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Herlihy, A.S., et al. 2010. Assessing the risks and benefits of diagnosing genetic conditions with variable phenotypes through population screening: Klinefelter syndrome as an example. Journal of community genetics 1(1): 41–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jadoul, P., et al. 2010. Fertility preservation in girls during childhood: Is it feasible, efficient and safe and to whom should it be proposed? Human reproduction update 16(6): 617–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jahnukainen, K., et al. 2006. Clinical potential and putative risks of fertility preservation in children utilizing gonadal tissue or germline stem cells. Pediatric Research 59(4 Pt 2): 40R–47R.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Jonas, H. 1997. Tecnica, medicina ed etica. Prassi del principio responsabilita. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  33. Kelleher, S., et al. 2001. Long-term outcomes of elective human sperm cryostorage. Human Reproduction 16(12): 2632–2639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lanfranco, F., et al. 2004. Klinefelter’s syndrome. Lancet 364(9430): 273–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Larcher, V. 2012. The ethical obligation to preserve fertility in the face of all therapies that might adversely affect it. Archives of Disease in Childhood 97(9): 767–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Laurie, G. 2014. Recognizing the right not to know: Conceptual, professional, and legal implications. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 42(1): 53–63.Google Scholar
  37. Laurie, G. 1999. In defence of ignorance: Genetic information and the right not to know. European Journal of Health Law 6: 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Magelssen, H., et al. 2005. Twenty years experience with semen cryopreservation in testicular cancer patients: Who needs it? European Urology 48(5): 779–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Medicine T. E. C. o. t. A. S. f. R. 2013. Fertility preservation and reproduction in patients facing gonadotoxic therapies: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility 100(5): 1224–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mehta, A., et al. 2013. Successful testicular sperm retrieval in adolescents with Klinefelter syndrome treated with at least 1 year of topical testosterone and aromatase inhibitor. Fertility and Sterility 100(4): 970–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mehta, A., and D.A. Paduch. 2012. Klinefelter syndrome: An argument for early aggressive hormonal and fertility management. Fertility and Sterility 98(2): 274–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mertes, H., and G. Pennings. 2011. Social egg freezing: For better, not for worse. Reproductive biomedicine online 23(7): 824–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Paduch, D.A., et al. 2009. Reproduction in men with Klinefelter syndrome: The past, the present, and the future. Seminars in reproductive medicine 27(2): 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Paduch, D.A., et al. 2008. New concepts in Klinefelter syndrome. Current Opinion in Urology 18(6): 621–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Poirot, C., and B. Schubert. 2011. Fertility preservation in prepubertal children. Bulletin du Cancer 98(5): 489–499.Google Scholar
  46. Quinn, G.P., et al. 2012. Preserving the right to future children: An ethical case analysis. The American Journal of Bioethics 12(6): 38–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rieker, P.P., et al. 1990. Adaptive behavioral responses to potential infertility among survivors of testis cancer. Journal of Clinical Oncology 8(2): 347–355.Google Scholar
  48. Rochman, B. 2011. Even as babies, cancer patients strive to preserve fertility. (last accessed August 2014).
  49. Ruutiainen, T., et al. 2013. Expanding access to testicular tissue cryopreservation: An analysis by analogy. The American journal of bioethics 13(3): 28–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Saito, K., et al. 2005. Sperm cryopreservation before cancer chemotherapy helps in the emotional battle against cancer. Cancer 104(3): 521–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sanchez-Serrano, M., et al. 2010. Twins born after transplantation of ovarian cortical tissue and oocyte vitrification. Fertility and Sterility 93(1): 268 e211–263.Google Scholar
  52. Satkoske, V.B., and L.S. Parker. 2013. Preserving testicular tissue and a boy’s open reproductive future. The American journal of bioethics 13(3): 36–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schiff, J.D., et al. 2005. Success of testicular sperm extraction [corrected] and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in men with Klinefelter syndrome. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 90(11): 6263–6267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schover, L.R. 2005. Motivation for parenthood after cancer: A review. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs 34: 2–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schover, L.R., et al. 2002. Knowledge and experience regarding cancer, infertility, and sperm banking in younger male survivors. Journal of Clinical Oncology 20(7): 1880–1889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Silber, S.J. 2012. Ovary cryopreservation and transplantation for fertility preservation. Molecular Human Reproduction 18(2): 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Simon, B., et al. 2005. Preserving fertility after cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 55(4): 211–228.Google Scholar
  58. Smajdor, A., and D. Cutas. 2013. Will artificial gametes end infertility? Health Care Analysis. doi: 10.1007/s10728-013-0268-x.Google Scholar
  59. Thomson, A.B., et al. 2002. Semen quality and spermatozoal DNA integrity in survivors of childhood cancer: A case-control study. Lancet 360(9330): 361–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. van Casteren, N.J., et al. 2008. Use rate and assisted reproduction technologies outcome of cryopreserved semen from 629 cancer patients. Fertility and Sterility 90(6): 2245–2250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Visootsak, J., and J.M. Graham Jr. 2006. Klinefelter syndrome and other sex chromosomal aneuploidies. Orphanet journal of rare diseases 1: 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. White, Y.A., et al. 2012. Oocyte formation by mitotically active germ cells purified from ovaries of reproductive-age women. Nature Medicine 18(3): 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wosnitzer, M.S., and D.A. Paduch. 2013. Endocrinological issues and hormonal manipulation in children and men with Klinefelter syndrome. American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics 163C(1): 16–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yoon, T.K., et al. 2003. Live births after vitrification of oocytes in a stimulated in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer program. Fertility and Sterility 79(6): 1323–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Historical, Philosophical and Religious StudiesUmeå UniversityUmeåSweden
  2. 2.Department of Philosophy, Linguistics and Theory of ScienceUniversity of GothenburgGothenburgSweden
  3. 3.Department of Health, Ethics and Society, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life SciencesMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  4. 4.GROW, School for Oncology and Developmental BiologyMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations