Informants a potential threat to confidentiality in small studies
Providing proper protection of confidentiality, by preventing personal data from falling into the hands of third parties, is one of the core responsibilities of researchers towards research participants. However, even if researchers do their best in this regard, it does not guarantee that breaches of confidentiality will be avoided. This paper addresses the case of small qualitative studies, arguing that researchers cannot guarantee their informants’ confidentiality, since that confidentiality may be compromised by actions taken by the informants themselves. In order to reduce the risk of this specific threat to confidentiality, additional precautions need to be taken. Some potential solutions to the problem are suggested and discussed.
KeywordsConfidentiality Ethics Informants Research ethics
- Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2008. Principles of biomedical ethics, 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Becker, S., and A. Bryman (eds.). 2004. Understanding research for social policy and practice: themes, methods and approaches. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
- Gregory, I. 2003. Ethics in research. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
- Lee, R. 1993. Doing research on sensitive topics. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Lowman, J. 2013. The betrayal of research confidentiality in British sociology. Research Ethics. Epub. doi: 10.1177/1747016113481145.
- Thomson, J. 1975. The right to privacy. Philosophy and Public Affairs 4(4): 295–314.Google Scholar
- Van den Hoonard, W. (ed.). 2002. Walking the tightrope: ethical issues for qualitative researchers. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- World Medical Association. 2013. Declaration of Helsinki—ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. 2013 revision. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/index.html.