Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 18, Issue 1, pp 13–22 | Cite as

Health-care needs and shared decision-making in priority-setting

Scientific Contribution

Abstract

In this paper we explore the relation between health-care needs and patients’ desires within shared decision-making (SDM) in a context of priority setting in health care. We begin by outlining some general characteristics of the concept of health-care need as well as the notions of SDM and desire. Secondly we will discuss how to distinguish between needs and desires for health care. Thirdly we present three cases which all aim to bring out and discuss a number of queries which seem to arise due to the double focus on a patient’s need and what that patient desires. These queries regard the following themes: the objectivity and moral force of needs, the prediction about what kind of patients which will appear on a micro level, implications for ranking in priority setting, difficulties regarding assessing and comparing benefits, and implications for evidence-based medicine.

Keywords

Needs Health-care needs Shared decision-making Desires Priority setting Rationing 

References

  1. Boorse, C. 1977. Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science 44: 542–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brülde, B. 1998. The human good. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
  3. Brülde, B. 2000a. On how to define the concept of health: A loose comparative approach. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3: 305–308.Google Scholar
  4. Brülde, B. 2000b. More on the looser comparative approach to defining “health”: A reply to Nordenfelt’s reply. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3: 313–315.Google Scholar
  5. Crisp, R. 2002. Treatment according to need: Justice and the British National Health Service. In Medicine and social justice: Essays on the distribution of health care, ed. R. Rhodes, 134–143. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Da Silva, D. 2012. Evidence: Helping people share decision making—A review of evidence considering whether shared decision making is worthwhile. London: The Health Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Daniels, N. 1995. Just health care. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Feldman, F. 2004. Pleasure and the good life—Concerning the nature, varieties, and plausibility of hedonism. Oxford: Calderon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Fleischhauer, K., and G. Hermerén. 2006. Goals of medicine in the course of history and today—A study in the history and philosophy of medicine. Stockholm: Kungl. Vitterhets historie och antikvitets akademien.Google Scholar
  10. Frankfurt, H.G. 1984. Necessity and desire. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 45: 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Griffin, J. 1986. Well-being: Its meaning, measurement, and moral importance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gustavsson, E. 2014. From needs to health care needs. Health Care Analysis 22: 22–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hasman, A., T. Hope, and L.P. Østerdal. 2006. Health care need: Three interpretations. Journal of Applied Philosophy 23: 145–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hope, T., L.P. Østerdal, and A. Hasman. 2010. An inquiry into the principles of needs-based allocation of health care. Bioethics 24: 470–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Juth, N. 2013. Challenges for principles of need in health care. Health Care Analysis. doi:10.1007/s10728-013-0242-7.Google Scholar
  16. Lantos, J., A.M. Matlock, and D. Wendler. 2011. Clinician integrity and limits to patient autonomy. JAMA 305: 495–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lindsay, M.S., and L.K. Reidar. 2008. Priority setting in health care: Lessons from the experiences of eight countries. International Journal for Equity in Health. doi:10.1186/1475-9276-7-4.Google Scholar
  18. Liss, P.-E. 1993. Health care need—Meaning and measurement. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  19. Liss, P.-E. 2003. The significance of the goal of health care for the setting of priorities. Health Care Analysis 11: 161–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mead, N., and P. Bower. 2000. Patient-centredness: A conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Social Science and Medicine 51: 1087–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nordenfelt, L. 1995. On the nature of health: An action-theoretic approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nordenfelt, L. 2000. On the comparative approach to defining health: A reply to Brülde. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3: 309–312.Google Scholar
  23. Nordenfelt, L. 2007. Action, ability and health—Essays in the philosophy of action and welfare. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  24. Nordin, I. 2000. Expert and non-expert knowledge in medical practice. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 3: 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Parfit, D. 1984. Reasons and persons. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Parfit, D. 2011. On what matters. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Rabinowicz, W., and J. Österberg. 1996. Value based on desires. Philosophy and Economics 12: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sandman, L., and C. Munthe. 2009. Shared decision-making and patient autonomy. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 30: 289–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sandman, L., B.B. Granger, I. Ekman, and C. Munthe. 2012. Adherence, shared decision-making and patient autonomy. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15: 115–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schroeder, T. 2009. Desire. Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/desire/. Accessed 3 Oct 2013.
  31. Sumner, L.W. 1996. Welfare, happiness & ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Swedish Health Care Act. (1982: 763), 2 §.Google Scholar
  33. The NHS Constitution for England. 2013. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-nhs-constitution-for-england. Accessed 25 Sept 2013.
  34. Thomson, G. 1987. Needs. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  35. Thomson, G. 2005. Fundamental needs. In The philosophy of need, ed. S. Reader, 175–186. Cambridge: Cambridge University.Google Scholar
  36. Wiggins, D. 1998. Needs, values, truth, 3rd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Health and Society, Department of Medical and Health SciencesLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  2. 2.The National Center for Priority Setting in Health Care, Department of Medical and Health SciencesLinköping UniversityLinköpingSweden
  3. 3.School of Health SciencesUniversity of BoråsBoråsSweden

Personalised recommendations