Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 573–578 | Cite as

Using non-human primates to benefit humans: research and organ transplantation

Scientific Contribution

Abstract

Emerging biotechnology may soon allow the creation of genetically human organs inside animals, with non-human primates (henceforth simply “primates”) and pigs being the best candidate species. This prospect raises the question of whether creating organs in primates in order to then transplant them into humans would be more (or less) acceptable than using them for research. In this paper, we examine the validity of the purported moral distinction between primates and other animals, and analyze the ethical acceptability of using primates to create organs for human use.

Keywords

Primates Research Xenotransplantation Personalized organs IPS cells Chimeras Hybrids Regenerative medicine Stem cells 

References

  1. Boneva, R., and T. Folks. 2004. Xenotransplantation and risks of zoonotic infections. Annals of Medicine 36: 504–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Edelman, D., C. Koch, and P. Low, 2012. Cambridge declaration on consciousness.Google Scholar
  3. European Commission Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks (SCHER). 2009. http://ec.europa.eu/health/opinions/en/non-human-primates/#7.
  4. Glendinning, L. Spanish parliament approves ‘human rights’ for apes http://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jun/26/humanrights.animalwelfare 26.6.08.
  5. Isotani, A., H. Hatayama, K. Kaseda, M. Ikawa, and M. Okabe. 2011. Formation of a thymus from rat ES cells in xenogeneic nude mouse<–>rat ES chimeras. Genes to Cells 16: 397–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kobayashi, T., et al. 2010. Generation of rat pancreas in mouse by interspecific blastocyst injection of pluripotent stem cells. Cell 142: 787–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Mattiuzzo, G., L. Scobie, and Y. Takeuchi. 2008. Strategies to enhance the safety profile of xenotransplantation: minimizing the risk of viral zoonoses. Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation 13: 184–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. McMahan, J. 2003. The ethics of killing: Problems at the margins of life. Oxford: Oxford University Pres.Google Scholar
  9. Nagel, T. 1974. What is it like to be a bat? The Philosophical Review 83(4): 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research. 2013. What are the 3Rs? http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/page.asp?id=7.
  11. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2005. The ethic of involving animals in research. http://www.nuffieldbioethics.org/animal-research.
  12. Shanks, N., and R. Greek. 2008. Experimental use of nonhuman primates is not a simple problem. Nature Medicine 14: 1012. doi:10.1038/nm1008-1012a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Shaw, D. 2014. Creating chimeras for organs is legal in Switzerland. Bioethica Forum 14(1).Google Scholar
  14. Singer, P. Practical ethics. 1993. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 87 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159109000392.
  15. Singer, P. Heavy petting. Nerve. 2001. Available at: http://www.utilitarianism.net/singer/by/2001----.htm.
  16. Wikipedia editors. Animal testing on non-human primates. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_testing_on_non-human_primates.
  17. Wurbel, H. 2009. Ethology applied to animal ethics. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 118(3–4):118–127. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159109000392.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Health, Ethics and SocietyMaastricht UniversityMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Institute for Biomedical EthicsUniversity of BaselBaselSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations