Educating about biomedical research ethics
This article examines the global and worsening problem of research misconduct as it relates to bio-medico-legal education. While research misconduct has serious legal implications, few adequate legal remedies exist to deal with it. With respect to teaching, research ethics education should be mandatory for biomedical students and physicians. Although teaching alone will not prevent misconduct, it promotes integrity, accountability, and responsibility in research. Policies and law enforcement should send a clear message that researchers should adhere to the highest standards of ethics in research. It is vital that researchers and physicians understand basic aspects of law and the legal system in order to develop understanding of the medico-legal issues not just in the legal context, but with a sound grounding in ethics, social and theoretical contexts so that they can practice good medicine. Routine and holistic research ethics education across the curriculum for medical students and resident physicians, and continuing medical education for practicing doctors, are probably the best ways to accomplish this goal.
KeywordsResearch ethics Scientific misconduct Research misconduct Teaching ethics Responsible conduct of research
- Bouville, M. 2008. Crime and punishment in scientific research. Physics and Society: arXiv:0803.4058 [physics.soc-ph].Google Scholar
- Brand, D. and J.M. Nash. 1987. It was too good to be true. Time, June 1, 1987, at 59 (quoting Dr. Robert Sprague, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign).Google Scholar
- Broad, W.J., and N. Wade. 1982. Betrayers of the Truth. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Comité Consultatif National d’Ethique. 2004. Opinion on education in medical ethics, No. 84, April 29, 2004, available at http://www.ccne-ethique.fr/en/publications/opinion-education-medical-ethics#.Up54RMRDvHQ. Accessed 4 April 2014.
- Cossins, D. 2012. A decade of misconduct. The Scientist, November 27, 2012, available at www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/33464/title/A-Decade-of-Misconduct/. Accessed 20 December 2013.
- Dalton, R. 1997. The Angelides Affair. Houston: Houston Press.Google Scholar
- David, A. 2003. Paper retracted as co-author admits forgery. Nature 421(6925): 775.Google Scholar
- Eichenwald, K. and G. Kolata. 1999. A doctor’s drug trials turn into fraud. N.Y. Times, May 17, 1999, at 1.Google Scholar
- Greenbaum, D. 2009. Research fraud: methods for dealing with an issue that negatively impacts society‘s view of science. Columbia Science and Technology Law Review 10: 61.Google Scholar
- Hasty, S. 2001. Firm Fined for Selling Unapproved AIDS Test. AIDS Weekly, May 21, 2001, available at. http://www.newsrx.com/newsletters/AIDS-Weekly/2001-05-21.html. Accessed 4 April 2014.
- Hixson, J. 1976. The Patchwork Mouse. Garden City: Anchor Press.Google Scholar
- Hwang, W.S., S.I. Roh, et al. 2005. Patient-specific embryonic stem cells derived from human SCNT blastocysts. Science 308(5729): 1777-1783, erratum in Hwang, W.S., S.I. Roh, et al. 2005. Science 310(5755): 1769, retraction in Kennedy, D. 2006. Science 311(5759): 335.Google Scholar
- Kohn, A. 1986. False Prophets. New York: Basil Blackwell Inc.Google Scholar
- Kulynych, J. 1998. Intent to deceive: mental state and scienter in the new uniform federal definition of scientific misconduct. Stanford Technology Law Review 2(1998): 2.Google Scholar
- Manson, H. 2008. The need for medical ethics education in family medicine training. Medical Ethics 40(9): 658–664.Google Scholar
- Parrish, D.M. 1998. The federal government and scientific misconduct proceedings, past, present, and future as seen through the Thereza Imanishi-Kari case. Journal of College & University Law 24: 581.Google Scholar
- Resnik, D.B. 2011. What is ethics in research & why is it important? NIEHS‐NIH, available at http://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/. Accessed 4 April 2014.
- Silverberg, L.L. 2000. Survey of medical ethics in US medical schools: a descriptive study. The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association 100(6): 373–378.Google Scholar
- Stankovic, B. 2004. Pulp fiction: reflections on scientific misconduct. Wisconsin Law Review 2004: 975–1013.Google Scholar
- Swaminathan, V., and M. Avery. 2012. FDA enforcement of criminal liability for clinical investigator fraud. Hastings Science & Technology Law Journal 4: 325–356.Google Scholar
- Wallis, C. 1983. Medicine: fraud in a Harvard lab. Time, February 28, 1983.Google Scholar
- Weiss, R.W., G.G. Gill, and C.A. Hudis. 2001. An on-site audit of the South African trial of high-dose chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer and associated publications. Journal of Clinical Oncology 19(11): 2771–2777.Google Scholar
- Zuckerman, H. 1984. Norms and deviant behavior in science. Science, Technology and Human Values 9(1): 7–13.Google Scholar