Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 559–571 | Cite as

The donor organ as an ‘object a’: a Lacanian perspective on organ donation and transplantation medicine

Scientific Contribution


Bioethical discourse on organ donation covers a wide range of topics, from informed consent procedures and scarcity issues up to ‘transplant tourism’ and ‘organ trade’. This paper presents a ‘depth ethics’ approach, notably focussing on the tensions, conflicts and ambiguities concerning the status of the human body (as something which constitutes a whole, while at the same time being a set of replaceable elements or parts). These will be addressed from a psychoanalytical (Lacanian) angle. First, I will outline Lacan’s view on embodiment as such. Subsequently, I will argue that, for organ recipients, the donor organ becomes what Lacan refers to as an object a, the ‘partial object’ of desire, the elusive thing we are deprived of, apparently beyond our grasp. Within the recipient’s body an empty space emerges, a kind of ‘vacuole’, once occupied by a faltering organ (now removed). This space can only be filled by a ‘gift’ from the other, by an object a. Once implanted, however, this implant becomes an ‘extimate’ object: something both ‘external’ and ‘intimate’, both ‘embedded’ and ‘foreign’, and which is bound to remain an object of concern for quite some time, if not for life. A Lacanian analysis allows us, first of all, to address the question what organ transplantation has in common with other bodily practices involving bodily parts procured from others, such as cannibalism. But it also reveals the basic difference between the two, as well as the distance between the ‘fragmented body’ of Frankenstein’s ‘monster’—as an aggregate of replaceable parts—and the multiple organ recipients (the ‘puzzle people’) of today.


Organ donation Transplantation medicine Embodiment Psychoanalysis Jacques Lacan Thomas Starzl Cannibalism 


  1. Aquinas, T. 1922. Summa Theologica (6 volumes). Taurini: Marietti.Google Scholar
  2. Adler, A. 1917/1927. Studie über Minderwertigkeit von Organen. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, A. 1927/2009. Menschenkenntnis. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.Google Scholar
  4. Bracher, M., M. Alcorn, F. Massardier-Kennedy, and R. Corthell (eds.). 1994. Lacanian theory of discourse: Subject, structure, and society. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Cassell, E. 1992. The body of the future. In The body in medical throught and practice. Philosophy & medicine, vol. 43, ed. D. Leder, 233–249. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dekkers, W., and H. ten Have. 1998. Biomedical research with human body ‘parts’. In Ownership of the human body. Philosophical considerations of the human body and its parts in healthcare. Philosophy and medicine, vol. 59, ed. H. ten Have and J. Welie, 49–63. Dordrecht: KluwerGoogle Scholar
  7. Frazer, J. 1890/1993. The golden bough. London: Wordsworth.Google Scholar
  8. Freud, S. 1905/1942. Drei Abhandlungen zur Sexualtheorie. Gesammelte Werke V, 27–145. London: Imago.Google Scholar
  9. Freud, S. 1907/1941. Der Wahn und die Träume in W. Jensens. Gradiva. Gesammelte Werke VII (Werke aus den Jahren 1906–1909), 29–122. London: Imago.Google Scholar
  10. Freud, S. 1913/1940. Totem und Tabu. Gesammelte Werke IX. London: Imago.Google Scholar
  11. Freud, S. 1919/1947. Das Unheimliche. Gesammelte Werke XII. London: Imago.Google Scholar
  12. Freud, S. 1921/1940. Massenpsychologie und Ich-Analyse. Gesammelte Werke XIII, 71–162. London: Imago.Google Scholar
  13. Freud, S. 1923/1940. Das Ich und das Es. Gesammelte Werke XIII, 237–289. London: Imago.Google Scholar
  14. Freud, S. 1930/1948. Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. Gesammelte Werke XIV, 419–513. London: Imago.Google Scholar
  15. Kass, L. 1992. Organs for sale? Propriety, property, and the price of progress. The Public Interest 107: 65–86. Google Scholar
  16. Lacan, J. 1966. Écrits. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  17. Lacan, J. 1981. Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan X: Les psychoses. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  18. Lacan, J. 2004. Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan X: L’Angoisse. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  19. Lacan, J. 2006. Le Séminaire de Jacques Lacan XVI: D’un Autre à l’autre. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  20. Skloot, R. 2011. The immortal life of Henrietta lacks. New York: Broadway Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  21. Sloterdijk, P. 2009. Du musst dein Leben ändern. Über Anthropotechnik. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  22. Starzl, T. 1992/2003. The puzzle people. memoirs of a transplant surgeon. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  23. ten Have, H., and J. Welie (eds.). 1998. Ownership of the human body. Philosophical considerations of the human body and its parts in healthcare. Philosophy and medicine, vol. 59. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  24. Wollstonecraft Shelley, M. 1818/1831/1968. Frankenstein; or, the modern Prometheus/three gothic novels. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
  25. Young, I.M. 1992. Breasted experience: The look and the feeling. In The body in medical throught and practice. Philosophy & medicine, vol. 43, ed. D. Leder, 215–230. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zwart, H. 1998. Medicine, symbolization and the ‘real’ body: Lacan’s understanding of medical science. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 1: 107–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zwart, H. 2000. From circle to square: Integrity, vulnerability and digitalization. In Bioethics and law II: Four ethical principles, ed. P. Kemp, et al., 141–153. Copenhagen: Rhodos.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Faculty of ScienceRadboud University NijmegenNijmegenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations