Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 377–387 | Cite as

Eternal sunshine of the spotless mind? An anthropological-ethical framework for understanding and dealing with sexuality in dementia care

  • Lieslot MahieuEmail author
  • Luc Anckaert
  • Chris Gastmans
Scientific Contribution


Contemporary bioethics pays considerable attention to the ethical aspects of dementia care. However, ethical issues of sexuality especially as experienced by institutionalized persons with dementia are often overlooked. The relevant existing ethics literature generally applies an implicit philosophical anthropology that favors the principle of respect for autonomy and the concomitant notion of informed consent. In this article we will illustrate how this way of handling the issue fails in its duty to people with dementia. Our thesis is that a more inclusive philosophical anthropology is needed that also heeds the fate of this growing population. Drawing on the tradition of phenomenology, we will chalk out an anthropological framework that rests on four fundamental characteristics of human existence: the decentered self, human embodiment, being-in-the-world and being-with-others. Our aim in this article is thus to tentatively put forward a broader perspective for looking at aged sexuality in institutionalized people with dementia. Hopefully the developed framework will mark the beginning of a new and refreshed ethical reflection on the topic at hand.


Dementia Ethics Nursing home Personhood Philosophy Sexuality 



The authors would like to express their gratitude to Prof. dr. Yvonne Denier and the anonymous reviewers for their guiding assistance in bringing this paper to higher level.


  1. Archibald, C. 1998. Sexuality, dementia and residential care: Managers report and response. Health and Social Care in the Community 6(2): 95–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Archibald, C. 2003. Sexuality and dementia: The role dementia plays when sexual expression becomes a component of residential care work. Alzheimer’s Care Quarterly 4(2): 137–148.Google Scholar
  3. Aristotle. 1967. Prior analytics, ed. H. Tredennick. London: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  4. Ashworth, A., and P. Ashworth. 2003. The lifeworld as phenomenon and as research heuristic, exemplified by a study of the lifeworld in a person suffering from Alzheimer’s Disease. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology 34(2): 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bauer, M., D. Fetherstonhaugh, L. Tarzia, R. Nay, D. Wellman, and E. Beattie. 2012. ‘I always look under the bed for a man’. Needs and barriers to the expression of sexuality in residential aged care: The views of residents with and without dementia. Psychology and Sexuality. doi: 10.1080/19419899.12.713869.Google Scholar
  6. Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2009. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Berger, J.T. 2000. Sexuality and intimacy in the nursing home: A romantic couple of mixed cognitive capacities. Journal of Clinical Ethics 11(4): 309–313.Google Scholar
  8. Carpentier, M.Y., and J.D. Fortenberry. 2010. Romantic and sexual relationships, body image, and fertility in adolescent and young adult testicular cancer survivors: A review of the literature. Journal of Adolescent Health 47(2): 115–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casta-Kaufteil, A. 2004. The old and the restless: Mediating rights to intimacy for nursing home residents with cognitive impairment. Journal of Medicine and Law 69: 69–86.Google Scholar
  10. Cleary, V., and J. Hegarty. 2011. Understanding sexuality in women with gyneacological cancer. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 15(1): 38–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Davis, D.H.J. 2004. Dementia: Sociological and philosophical constructions. Social Science and Medicine 58(2): 369–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dekkers, W.J.M. 2001. Autonomy and dependence: Chronic physical illness and decision-making capacity. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4(2): 185–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dekkers, W.J.M. 2004. Autonomy and the lived body in cases of severe dementia. In Ethical foundations of palliative care for alzheimer disease, ed. R.D. Purtilo, and H.A.M.J. ten Have, 115–130. Maryland: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Dekkers, W. 2013. Do we need an anthropology of the aging person and what should it look like? In Ethics, health policy and (anti-) aging: Mixed blessings, ed. M. Schermer, and W. Pinxten, 41–58. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. den Hartogh, G. 2013. The authority of advance directives. In Justice, luck and responsibility in health care, ed. Y. Denier, C. Gastmans, and A. Vandevelde, 167–188. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Diprose, R. 2002. Corporeal generosity. On giving with Nietzsche, Merleau-Ponty and Levinas. New York, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  17. Fontana, A., and R.W. Smith. 1989. Alzheimer’s disease victims: The “unbecoming” of self and the normalization of competence. Sociological Perspectives 32(1): 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gott, M. 2005. Sexuality, sexual health and ageing. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Groenhout, R.E. 2004. Connected lives. Human nature and an ethics of care. New York, NY: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  20. Hajjar, Ramzi R., and Hosam K. Kamel. 2003. Sex and the nursing home. Clinics in Geriatric Medicine 19(3): 575–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Heidegger, M. 2001. Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer Verlag.Google Scholar
  22. Hodson, D.S., and P. Skeen. 1994. Sexuality and aging: The hammerlock of myths. Journal of Applied Gerontology 13(3): 219–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Holm, S. 2013. The implicit anthropology of bioethics and the problem of the aging person. In Ethics, health policy and (anti-) aging: Mixed blessings, ed. M. Schermer, and W. Pinxten, 59–71. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hughes, J.C. 2013. Philosophical issues in dementia. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 26(3): 283–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kaplan, D.M. 2005. Ricoeur Paul. In Encyclopedia of philosophy, vol. 8, ed. D.M. Borchert, 460–466. Detroit, MI: Thomson Gale, Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar
  26. Kuhn, D.R., D. Greiner, and L. Arseneau. 1998. Addressing hypersexuality in Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Gerontological Nursing 24(4): 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leder, D. 1990. The absent body. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Levinas, E. 1961. Totalité et infini. Essai sur l’exteriorité. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  29. Levinas, E. 1977. Du sacré au saint. Cinq nouvelles lectures talmudiques. Paris: Minuit.Google Scholar
  30. Lichtenberg, P.A. 1997. Clinical perspectives on sexual issues in nursing homes. Topics in Geriatric Rehabilitation 12(4): 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lindsay, R.J. 2010. The need for more specific legislation in sexual consent capacity assessments for nursing home residents. Journal of Legal Medicine 31(3): 303–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lingler, J.H. 2003. Ethical issues in distinguishing sexual activity from sexual maltreatment among women with dementia. Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect 15(2): 85–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mahieu, L., and C. Gastmans. 2012. Sexuality in institutionalized elderly persons: A systematic review of argument-based ethics literature. International Psychogeriatrics 24(3): 346–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Merleau-Ponty, M. 2002. Phenomenology of perception (trans: Smith, C.). London, New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Nortvedt, P. 1996. Sensitive judgment: Nursing, moral philosophy and an ethics of care. Oslo: Tano Aschehoug.Google Scholar
  36. Pettersen, T. 2012. Conceptions of care: Altruism, feminism, and mature care. Hypatia 27(2): 366–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Phinney, A., and C.A. Chesla. 2003. The lived body in dementia. Journal of Aging Studies 17(3): 283–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Post, S.G. 1995. Dementia in our midst: The moral community. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4: 142–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Post, S.G. 2000. Commentary on “Sexuality and intimacy in the nursing home”. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 11(4): 314–317.Google Scholar
  40. Post, S.G. 2003. Dementia. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, 3rd ed, ed. S.G. Post, 634–642. New York, NY: Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar
  41. Psillos, S. 2011. An explorer upon untrodden ground: Pierce on abduction. In Handbook of the history of logic, vol. 10, ed. D.M. Gabbay, S. Hartmann, and J. Woods, 115–148., Inductive logic Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  42. Ricoeur, P. 1991. Narrative identity. Philosophy Today 35(1): 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rosen, T., M.S. Lachs, and K. Pillemer. 2010. Sexual aggression between residents in nursing homes: Literature synthesis of an underrecognized problem. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 58(10): 1070–1079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Sabat, S.R. 2005. Capacity for decision-making in Alzheimer’s disease: Selfhood, positioning and semiotic people. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 39: 1030–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sabat, S.R., A. Johnson, C. Swarbrick, and J. Keady. 2011. The ‘demented other’ or simply ‘a person’? Extending the philosophical discourse of Naue and Kroll through the situated self. Nursing Philosophy 12(4): 282–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sartre, J.-P. 1943. L’Être et le néant: Essai d’ontologie phénoménologique. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  47. Schillmeier, M.W.J. 2009. Actor-networks of dementia. In Un/knowing bodies, ed. J.E. Latimer, and M.W.J. Schillmeier, 141–158. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd/The Sociological Review.Google Scholar
  48. Selling, J. 1998. The human person. In Christian ethics: An introduction, ed. B. Hoose, 95–109. London: Cassel.Google Scholar
  49. Sheehan, T. 2005. Heidegger, Martin (1889–1976). In The shorter routledge encyclopedia of philosophy, ed. E. Craig, 354–366. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  50. Slatman, J., A. Halsema, and G. Widdershoven. 2010. Sex and enhancement: A phenomenological-existential view. The American Journal of Bioethics 10(7): 20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Steeman, E., B. Dierckx de Casterlé, J. Godderis, and M. Grypdonck. 2006. Living with early-stage dementia: A review of qualitative studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing 54(6): 722–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sunstein, C.R. 1995. Incompletely theorized agreements. Harvard Law Review 108(7): 1733–1772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tarzia, L., D. Fetherstonhaugh, and M. Bauer. 2012. Dementia, sexuality and consent in residential aged care facilities. Journal of Medical Ethics 38(10): 609–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Van Heijst, A. 2011. Professional loving care: An ethical view on the healthcare sector. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar
  55. Verhack, I. 2000. De mens en zijn onrust: Over het raadsel van de beweging. Leuven: Acco.Google Scholar
  56. Visker, R. 1997. The core of my opposition to Levinas. A clarification for Richard Rorty. Ethical Perspectives 4(2): 154–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Visker, R. 2003. Is ethics fundamental? Questioning Levinas on irresponsibility. Continental Philosophy Review 36(3): 263–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Visker, R. 2005a. The strange(r) within me. Ethical Perspectives 12(4): 425–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Visker, R. 2005b. Vreemd gaan en vreemd blijven. Filosofie van de multiculturaliteit. Amsterdam: SUN.Google Scholar
  60. Widdershoven, G. 2003. Understanding dementia: A hermeneutic perspective. In Nature and narrative: An introduction to the new philosophy of psychiatry, ed. B. Fulford, 103–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Widdershoven, G., and R.L.P. Berghmans. 2006. Meaning-making in dementia: A hermeneutic perspective. In Dementia: Mind, meaning, and the person, ed. J.C. Hughes, L. Stephen, and S.R. Sabat, 179–191. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Zaner, R.M. 1964. The problem of embodiment. Some contributions to a phenomenology of the body. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
  63. Zaner, R.M. 2003. Body. In Encyclopedia of bioethics, 3rd ed, ed. S.G. Post, 320–327. New York, NY: Macmillan Reference USA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and LawKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
  2. 2.Institute of Philosophy, Centre for Ethics, Social and Political PhilosophyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium

Personalised recommendations