Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 17, Issue 4, pp 519–528 | Cite as

Self-sacrifice and self-affirmation within care-giving

Scientific Contribution

Abstract

According to the ethics of care, practices of care are sources of moral knowledge that take human relatedness into account. However, caregivers may also find themselves in situations that demand sacrifices, even to the point where their own self is at stake. This may not only be cause for concern about the risks of caregivers, the result of an unequal distribution of power, but it may as well be a chance for affirmation of one’s identity, of self-attestation. As Ricoeur argues, giving of the self or even giving one’s life may be the ultimate expression of one’s belonging, in friendship, devotion or loyalty. Ricoeur also considers the meaning of giving a gift, which to him does not lie in any return gift, but rather in the gift as offering, as generosity. Giving is first of all a risk, a sacrifice, with only the hope that it will be received. In this article I aim to extend his argument to the realm of caregiving, thereby supporting my claim that some sort of self-sacrifice is implied in the very act of caring for others.

Keywords

Ricoeur Care ethics Sacrifice Self-sacrifice Caring for others Identity Self-affirmation Self-attestation 

References

  1. Bailey, J. 1999. Elegy for Iris. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, J. 2000. Iris and her friends. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blanc, G. le. 2006. “Penser la fragilité”. In: Esprit, 323(245–259).Google Scholar
  4. Coetzee, J.M. 1999. Disgrace. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
  5. de Visscher, J. 2007. Ricoeur. Klement: De weg naar verstaan. Kampen.Google Scholar
  6. Groenhout, R.E. 2003. I can’t say no: Self-sacrifice and an ethics of care. In Philosophy, Feminism, and Faith, ed. R.E. Groenhout, and M. Bower. Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Honneth, A. 1992. Kampf um anerkennung. zur moralischen grammatik sozialer konflikte. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  8. Honneth, A. 1995. The Struggle for recognition the moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Lothes Biviano, E. 2007. The paradox of christian sacrifice the loss of self, the gift of self. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  10. Noddings, N. 1984. Caring a feminine approach to ethics & moral education. Berkeley etc.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ricoeur, P. 1992. Oneself as Another. (or. 1990, transl. by Kathleen Blamey). Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Ricoeur, P. 2002. Fallible Man. (or. 1960, revised transl. by Charles A. Kelbley). New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Ricoeur, P. 2005. The Course of Recognition. (or. 2004, transl. by David Pellauer) Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Ruddick, S. 1989. Maternal thinking. toward a politics of peace. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Tolstoy, L. 2006. Originally in Russian, 1886. The Death of Ivan Ilyich. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  16. Tronto, J.C. 1993. Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. New York etc.: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Van Heijst, A. 2011. Professional loving care an ethical view of the healthcare sector. Leuven: Peeters.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.GoudaThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations