Advertisement

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 647–652 | Cite as

Against culturally sensitive bioethics

  • Tomislav BracanovicEmail author
Scientific Contribution

Abstract

This article discusses the view that bioethics should become “culturally sensitive” and give more weight to various cultural traditions and their respective moral beliefs. It is argued that this view is implausible for the following three reasons: it renders the disciplinary boundaries of bioethics too flexible and inconsistent with metaphysical commitments of Western biomedical sciences, it is normatively useless because it approaches cultural phenomena in a predominantly descriptive and selective way, and it tends to justify certain types of discrimination.

Keywords

Bioethics Biomedical sciences Cultural sensitivity Discrimination Diversity Normativity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The first draft of this paper was presented in December 2012 in the Theoretical Philosophy Forum at the Institute of Philosophy of the Eötvös Loránd University in Budapest. I am grateful to members of the audience for their comments. I also wish to thank an anonymous reviewer for Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy for helpful suggestions.

References

  1. Bracanovic, T. 2011. Respect for cultural diversity in bioethics. Empirical, conceptual and normative constraints. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14: 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chattopadhyay, S., and R. De Vries. 2008. Bioethical concerns are global, bioethics is Western. Eubios Journal of Asian and International Bioethics 18(4): 106–109.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chattopadhyay, S., and R. De Vries. (forthcoming). Respect for cultural diversity in bioethics is an ethical imperative. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy.Google Scholar
  4. Giere, R.N. 2001. Naturalism. In A companion to the philosophy of science, ed. W.H. Newton-Smith, 308–310. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  5. Herrera, C. 2008. Is it time for bioethics to go empirical? Bioethics 22: 137–146.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kipnis, K. 2005. Quality care and the wounds of diversity. In Biomedical ethics, ed. T.A. Mappes, and D. DeGrazia, 127–131. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  7. Kuhn, T. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Macklin, R. 2005. Ethical relativism in a multicultural society. In Biomedical ethics, ed. T.A. Mappes, and D. DeGrazia, 118–127. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  9. Muzur, A. (forthcoming). The nature of bioethics revisited. A comment on Bracanovic. Developing World Bioethics.Google Scholar
  10. Purnell, L.D., and B.J. Paulanka. 2008. Transcultural health care: A culturally competent approach. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company.Google Scholar
  11. Savulescu, J. 1998. Two worlds apart: Religion and ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 24: 382–384.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Savulescu, J., and R.W. Momeyer. 1997. Should informed consent be based on rational beliefs? Journal of Medical Ethics 23: 282–288.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Schaefer-Rolffs, J. 2012. Integrative bioethics as a chance. An ideal example for ethical discussions? Synthesis Philosophica 53: 107–122.Google Scholar
  14. Sober, E. 1986. Philosophical problems for environmentalism. In The preservation of species: The value of biological diversity, ed. B.G. Norton, 173–194. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Steinfels, P. 1976. Against bioethicists. The Hastings Center Report 6: 18–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Stuart, B., C. Cherry, and J. Stuart. 2011. Pocket guide to culturally sensitive health care. Philadelphia: F. A. Davis Company.Google Scholar
  17. Ten Have, H., and B. Gordijn. 2011. Traveling bioethics. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14: 1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. UNESCO. 2002. Universal declaration on cultural diversity. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy, Center for Croatian StudiesUniversity of ZagrebZagrebCroatia

Personalised recommendations