Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 16, Issue 4, pp 877–884 | Cite as

Risk, Russian-roulette and lotteries: Persson and Savulescu on moral enhancement

  • Darryl GunsonEmail author
  • Hugh McLachlan
Scientific Contribution


The literature concerning the possibility and desirability of using new pharmacological and possible future genetic techniques to enhance human characteristics is well-established and the debates follow some well-known argumentative patterns. However, one argument in particular stands out and demands attention. This is the attempt to tie the moral necessity of moral enhancement to the hypothesised risks that allowing cognitive enhancement will bring. According to Persson and Savulescu, cognitive enhancement should occur only if the risks they think it to poses are mitigated by moral enhancement. By this they mean the compulsory and universal amplification of the disposition of altruism and the inflation of our sense of fairness, by chemical and/or genetic means. Their claim is important, intriguing and unsettling. This paper focuses on three central, but relatively neglected, features of their argument. First, there is a pernicious ambiguity in the language of ‘risk’ used by Persson and Savulescu where they tend to conflate ‘risk’ and ‘uncertainty’. Second, their use of the lottery analogy to render their position more plausible is unconvincing. It tends to distort rather than illuminate the relevant considerations. Third, Persson and Savulescu do not adequately take into account the social and individual benefits that enhancing cognition could have. If they did, it would be apparent that those benefits alone would outweigh the considerations used to justify accompanying CE with ME.


Lottery Cognitive enhancement Moral enhancement Risk Persson and Savulescu 


  1. Batt, J. 2005. Stolen innocence: A mother’s fight for justice. London: Ebury Press.Google Scholar
  2. Connemann, B.J., M.S. Mumenthaler, J.A. Yesavage, J.L. Taylor, L. Friedman, R. O’Hara, J. Sheikh, J. Tinklenberg, and P.J. Whitehouse. 2003. Donepezil and flight simulator performance: Effects on retention of complex skills. Neurology 61(5): 721.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Douglas, T. 2011. Moral enhancement via direct emotion modulation: a reply to John Harris. Bioethics doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01919.x.
  4. Farah, M.J., J. Illes, R. Cook-Deegan, H. Gardner, E. Kandel, P. King, E. Parens, B. Sahakian, and P.R. Wolpe. 2004. Neurocognitive enhancement: What can we do and what should we do? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5(5): 421.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Glannon, W. 2006. Neuroethics. Bioethics 20(1): 37–52.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Guan, J.-S., S.J. Haggarty, E. Giacometti, J.-H. Dannenberg, N. Joseph, J. Gao, T.J.F. Nieland, Y. Zhou, X. Wang, R. Mazitschek, J.E. Bradner, R.A. DePinho, R. Jaenisch, and L.-H. Tsai. 2009. Hdac2 negatively regulates memory formation and synaptic plasticity. Nature 459(7243): 55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gunson, D. 2009. Cognitive enhancement: Analogical reasoning and social justice. Journal of International Biotechnology Law 6(4): 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Harris, J. 2007. Enhancing evolution: The ethical case for making better people. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Harris, J. 2011. Moral enhancement and freedom. Bioethics 25(2): 102.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harris, J. 2012. Ethics is for the bad guys! putting the ‘moral’ into moral enhancement. Bioethics. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2011.01946.x.
  11. Häyry, M. 2010. Rationality and the genetic challenge: Making people better?. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kiuru, M., and R.G. Crystal. 2008. Progress and prospects: Gene therapy for performance and appearance enhancement. Gene Therapy 15(5): 329.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lewens, T. (ed.). 2007. Risk: Philosophical perspectives. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Müller, U., N. Steffenhagen, R. Regenthal, and P. Bublak. 2004. Effects of Modafinil on working memory processes in humans. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 177(1): 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Nicholas, A., C.D. Munhoz, D. Ferguson, L. Campbell, and R. Sapolsky. 2006. Enhancing cognition after stress with gene therapy. Journal of Neuroscience 26(45): 11637–11643.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Persson, I., and J. Savulescu. 2008. The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. Journal of Applied Philosophy 25(3): 162–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Persson, I., and J. Savulescu. 2010. Moral transhumanism. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35(6): 656–669.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Persson, I., and J. Savulescu. 2012. Unfit for the future: The need for moral enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rid, A., E. Emanuel, and D. Wendler. 2010. Evaluating the risks of clinical research. The Journal of the American Medical Association 304(13): 1472–1479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Rossi, J., and R.M. Nelson. 2012. Is there an objective way to compare research risks? Journal of Medical Ethics 38(7): 423–427.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roth, T., G. Rippon, and S. Arora. 2008. Armodafinil Improves wakefulness and long-term episodic memory in Ncpap-adherent patients with excessive sleepiness associated with obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep and Breathing 12(1): 53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tang, Y.-P., E. Shimizu, G.R. Dube, C. Rampon, G.A. Kerchner, M. Zhuo, G. Liu, and J.Z. Tsien. 1999. Genetic enhancement of learning and memory in mice. Nature 401(6748): 63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Turner, D., T. Robbins, L. Clark, A. Aron, J. Dowson, and B. Sahakian. 2003. Cognitive enhancing effects of Modafinil in healthy volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl) 165(3): 260.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Politics and Sociology, School of Social ScienceUniversity of the West of ScotlandPaisleyScotland, UK
  2. 2.Department of Social Sciences, Media and JournalismGlasgow Caledonian UniversityGlasgowScotland, UK

Personalised recommendations