Abstract
Informed consent is thought to exist as a well-defined entity. Altered concepts of patient autonomy, differential cultural understanding of the entity, and the failure of clients to distinguish between research and clinical ethics, and various hierarchical cultural views of informed consent all suggest that alterations may be needed in the traditional concept. By using the methodology outlined by Gasking in which he defines the idea of “cluster concepts,” one may be able to enlarge the definition and augment the understanding of the informed consent and include the time and culture-specific variants which exist.
References
Al-Faleh, H.F., N.S. Al-Majed, et al. 2010. Detailed disclosure to Saudi Arabian patients on risks related to an invasive procedure. Saudi Medical Journal 31(7): 814–818.
Edworthy, S.M., E. Zatarain, et al. 1988. Analysis of the 1982 ARA lupus criteria data set by recursive partitioning methodology: New insights into the relative merit of individual criteria. Journal of Rheumatology 15(10): 1493–1498.
Faden, R.R., T.L. Beauchamp, et al. 1986. A history and theory of informed consent. New York: Oxford University Press.
Gasking, D. 1960. Clusters. The Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38(1): 1–36.
Harmon, A. 2010. Indian tribe wins fight to limit research of its DNA. New York, NY: New York Times.
Hurst, S.A. 2008. Vulnerability in research and health care; describing the elephant in the room? Bioethics 22(4): 191–202.
Kass, N., and A. Hyder. 2001. Attitudes and experiences of US and developing country investigators regarding US human subjects regulations. Ethical and Policy Issues in International Research: Clinical Trials in Developing Countries I, II: B1–B220.
Lindegger, G., and L.M. Richter. 2000. HIV vaccine trials: Critical issues in informed consent. South African Journal of Science 96: 313–317.
Mallardi, V. 2005. The origin of informed consent. Acta Otorhinolaryngologica Italica 25(5): 312–327.
Pellegrino, E.D. 1992. Intersections of Western biomedical ethics and world culture: Problematic and possibility. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 1(3): 191–196.
Petrini, C. 2010. “Broad” consent, exceptions to consent and the question of using biological samples for research purposes different from the initial collection purpose. Social Science and Medicine 70(2): 217–220.
Rauch, A.M., and E.S. Hurwitz. 1985. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) case definition for Kawasaki syndrome. Pediatr Infectious Disease 4(6): 702–703.
Reymond, M.A., A.S. Allal, et al. 2003. Informed consent for molecular-based diagnostic and prognostic studies in the cancer patient. Digestive Diseases 21(4): 351–356.
Santillan-Doherty, P., A. Cabral-Castaneda, et al. 2003. Informed consent in clinical practice and medical research. Revista de Investigacion Clinica 55(3): 322–338.
Shestack, J.J. 1998. The philosophic foundations of human rights. Human Rights Quarterly 20(2): 201–234.
Sriram, T.G., K.V. Kumar, et al. 1991. Informed consent: a study of experiences and opinion of utilizers of health services from India. Social Science and Medicine 32(12): 1389–1392.
Sykes, B. 2012. DNA USA : A genetic portrait of America. New York: Liveright Pub. Corp.
Uzbeck, M., C. Quinn, et al. 2009. Randomised controlled trial of the effect of standard and detailed risk disclosure prior to bronchoscopy on peri-procedure anxiety and satisfaction. Thorax 64(3): 224–227.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shandera, W.X. Can our understanding of informed consent be strengthened using the idea of cluster concepts?. Med Health Care and Philos 16, 679–682 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-012-9448-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-012-9448-y