Advertisement

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

, Volume 16, Issue 3, pp 575–585 | Cite as

Death: ‘nothing’ gives insight

  • Eric J. Ettema
Scientific Contribution

Abstract

According to a widely accepted belief, we cannot know our own death—death means ‘nothing’ to us. At first sight, the meaning of ‘nothing’ just implies the negation or absence of ‘something’. Death then simply refers to the negation or absence of life. As a consequence, however, death has no meaning of itself. This leads to an ontological paradox in which death is both acknowledged and denied: death is … nothing. In this article, I investigate whether insight into the ontological paradox of the nothingness of death can contribute to a good end-of-life. By analysing Aquinas’, Heidegger’s and Derrida’s understanding of death as nothingness, I explore how giving meaning to death on different ontological levels connects to, and at the same time provides resistance against, the harsh reality of death. By doing so, I intend to demonstrate that insight into the nothingness of death can count as a framework for a meaningful dealing with death.

Keywords

Death Meaning Nothingness Ontology Aquinas Heidegger Derrida 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to express my sincere thanks to Evert van Leeuwen and Loes Derksen who gave fruitful comments on an earlier draft. Thanks also to the research group Philosophical Anthropology and Gender Studies, of the Faculty of Philosophy of the Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, for giving me the opportunity to discuss an early version of this work.

References

  1. Becker, E. 1973. The denial of death. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  2. Behrendt, K. 2010. A special way of being afraid. Philosophical Psychology 23(5): 669–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Carel, H. 2006. Life and death in Freud and Heidegger. Amsterdam: Radopi.Google Scholar
  4. Carel, H. 2007. Can I be ill and happy? Philosophia 35: 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carel, H. 2008. Illness: The cry of the flesh. Stockfield: Acumen.Google Scholar
  6. Critchley, S., and R. Schürmann. 2008. On Heidegger’s being and time. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Derrida, J. 1973. Speech and phenomena and other essays on Husserl’s theory of signs. Evanston: Northwestern University press.Google Scholar
  8. Derrida, J. 1993. Aporias. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Derrida, J. 1995. The gift of death. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Derrida, J. 2005. Literature in secret: An impossible filiation. Translation and Commentary Adam Kotsko. Chicago Theological Seminary.Google Scholar
  11. Dreyfus, H.L. 1991. Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s being and time division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  12. Elders, L. J. (1981a). De metafysica van St. Thomas van Aquino in historisch perspectief. Deel I. Het gemeenschappelijk zijnde [The metaphysics of Thomas Aquinas in historical perspective. Part I. The communal being], 145–146. Brugge: Uitgeverij Tabor.Google Scholar
  13. Elders, L.J. 1981b. De metafysica van St. Thomas van Aquino in historisch perspectief. Deel II. Filosofische Godsleer [The metaphysics of Thomas Aquinas in historical perspective. Part II. Philosophical Theology]. Brugge: Uitgeverij Tabor.Google Scholar
  14. Epicurus. (1994). Letter to Menoeceus (text 4), section 125. In The Epicurus reader. Selected writings and testimonia, ed. B. Inwood and L.P. Gerson, viii.Google Scholar
  15. Ettema, E.J. 2007. Stervensbegeleiding voor agnosten [Terminal care for agnostics]. In Wat is wijs? Reflecties op spirituele vorming. [What is wise? Reflections on spiritual education], Roothaan, A. and Van Saane, J. (red.), 78–98. Ten Have, Kampen.Google Scholar
  16. Ettema, E.J. 2009. Tussen schijn en werkelijkheid. Over ontologie en de transformerende kracht van bijna-dood-ervaringen. [Between appearance and reality. About ontology and the transformative power of near-death-experiences.], 55–70. In Filosoferen over eindeloos bewustzijn, ed. Bart Voorsluis. [Philosophising about endless consciousness], Kampen: Ten Have.Google Scholar
  17. Freud, S. 1957. Thoughts for the times on war and death. II. Our attitude towards death. In The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud, ed. & trans. J. Strachley, vol. XIV, 1914–1916. London: Hogarth Press.Google Scholar
  18. George, L.K., D.B. Larson, H.G. Koenig, and M.E. McCullough. 2000. Spirituality and health: What we know, what we need to know. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 19: 102–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Heidegger, M. 2008 (1927). Being and time (trans: John Macquarrie and Edward Robinson), New York: Harper Perennial.Google Scholar
  20. Heidegger, M. 1999 (1947). Letter on Humanism. In Basic writings. ed. Krell, D.F., 213–266. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Jankélévitch, V. 1966. La mort. Paris: Flammarion, Éditeur.Google Scholar
  22. Kaufmann, J. 1995. Blinkings: A thanatocentric theory of consciousness. In Awareness of mortality, ed. Kaufmann Jeffrey, 75–89. New York: Baywood Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  23. Koenig, H.G. 2007. Spirituality and depression: A look at the evidence. Southern Medical Journal 100: 737–739.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Larkin, Ph. 1988. Aubade. In Philip Larkin: Collected poems, ed. A. Thwaite. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
  25. Leget, C., Staps, T., Van der Geer, J., Mur-Arnoldi, C., Wulp, M. and Jochemsen, H. 2010. Richtlijn Spirituele zorg [Guideline spiritual care]. In Palliatieve zorg. Richtlijnen voor de praktijk, ed. De Graeff, A., Van Bommel, J.M.P., Van Deijck, R.H.P.D., Eynden, B.R.L.C., Krol, R., Oldemenger, W. et al. [Palliative care. Guidelines for practice]. Utrecht: VIKC.Google Scholar
  26. Levinas, E. 1969. Totality and infinity (trans: Alphonso Lingis). Pittsburgh: Duquesne University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Levinas, E. 1993. Dieu, la mort e le temps. Paris: Grasset.Google Scholar
  28. Mayers, A.M., N.A. Naples, and R.D. Nilsen. 2005. Existential issues and coping: A qualitative study of low-income women with HIV. Psychology and Health 20(1): 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mulhall, S. 2005 (1996). Routledge philosophy guidebook to Heidegger and being and time. Second edition. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Nagel, Th. 1986. The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Sawatzky, R., P.A. Ratner, and L. Chiu. 2005. A meta-analysis of the relationship between spirituality and quality of life. Social Indicators Research 72: 153–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stefanek, M., P.G. McDonald, and S.A. Hess. 2005. Religion, spirituality and cancer: Current status and methodological challenges. Psycho-Oncology 14: 450–463.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Stocker, B. 2006. Routledge philosophy guidebook to Derrida on deconstruction. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Svartberg, S. 1993. Struggling for meaning: How HIV-positive gay men make sense of aids. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 24(4): 483–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. The New York Times Magazine. 1994, January 23. In Thomson, can I die? Derrida on Heidegger on death. Philosophy Today, vol. 43, 1/4, 1999: 29–42.Google Scholar
  36. Thomson, I. 1999. Can I die? Derrida on Heidegger on death. Philosophy Today 43(1/4): 34.Google Scholar
  37. Timmermans, S. 1994. Dying of awareness. The theory of awareness contexts revisited. Sociology of Health and Illness 16(3): 322–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Toner, P. 2010. St. Thomas Aquinas on death and the separated soul. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 91(4): 587–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zimmermann, C. 2007. Death denial: obstacle or instrument for palliative care? An analysis of clinical literature. Sociology of Health & Illness 29(2): 297–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Metamedica, Section Philosophy and Medical EthicsVU University Medical CenterAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations