Abstract
Professionalism is initially understood as a historical process, through which certain commercial services sought to improve their social status (and economic reward) by separating themselves from mere crafts or trades. This process may be traced clearly with the aspiration of British portrait painters (headed by Sir Joshua Reynolds), in the eighteenth century, to acquire a social status akin to that of already established professionals, such as clerics and doctors. This may be understood, to a significant degree, as a process of gentrification. The values of the professional thereby lie as much in the etiquette and other social skills with which they deal with their clients, than with any distinctive form of skill or value. Professionalisation as gentrification seemingly says little about the nature of modern professionalism. However, if this process is also construed as one in which the goals and achievements of the profession come to be subject to radical reflection, then something significant about professional values emerges. On this account, the profession is distinguished from craft or trade on the grounds that the goals of the profession, and the effectiveness of any attempt to realise them, are not transparent to the client. While a lay person will typically have the competence necessary to judge whether or not a craft worker has achieved their goal, that person will not necessarily be able to recognise the values that determine the success of a medical operation. It will be concluded that the values of a profession are articulated intrinsically to the profession, in terms of the contested understanding that the professionals themselves have of the meaning of the profession and the narratives within which its history is to be told.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For a more detailed discussion of the argumentative structure of Reynolds’s Discourses and its implications for the professionalisation of art, see Edgar 2004.
As Raanan Gillon has proposed, in private conversation with the author.
My thanks to Simon Waltho for bringing this passage to my attention.
References
Bowling, A. 1997. Measuring health: A review of quality of life measurement scales, 2nd ed. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Edgar, A. 2004. Professionalisation and aesthetic values. In Values in professional practice: lessons for health, social care and other professionals, ed. S. Pattison, and R. Pill, 35–46. Radcliffe: Oxford.
Habermas, J. 1990. “Philosophy as Stand-In and Interpreter”. In Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, 1–20. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Hume, D. 1996. Selected essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kant, I. 1952. The critique of judgement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindemann, M. 2008. Medicine, medical practice, and public health. In A Companion to Eighteenth-Century Europe, ed. Wilson, Peter H. Oxford: Blackwell Reference Online. http://www.blackwellreference.com/subscriber/tocnode?id=g9781405139472_chunk_g978140513947212 (accessed 10th February 2009).
McLachlen, J., and D. Patten. 2006. Anatomy teaching: Ghosts of the past, present and future. Medical Education 40: 243–253.
Percival, J. 1849. Medical ethics, 2nd ed. Oxford: Shrimpton.
Porter, R. 1997. The greatest benefit of mankind: A medical history of humanity from antiquity to the present. London: Harper Collins.
Reynolds, J. 1975. Discourses on art. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Seedhouse, J. 1986. Health: The foundations for achievement. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
Tebbitt, M. 2005. Philosophy of law: An introduction, 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Edgar, A. Professional values, aesthetic values, and the ends of trade. Med Health Care and Philos 14, 195–201 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9298-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-010-9298-4