Skip to main content
Log in

Negotiated or taken-for-granted trust? Explicit and implicit interpretations of trust in a medical setting

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Trust between a patient and a medical doctor is normally both justified and taken for granted, but sometimes it may need to be negotiated. In this paper I will present how trust can be interpreted as both an explicit and implicit phenomenon, drawing on literature from the social sciences and philosophy. The distinction between explicit and implicit interpretations of trust will be used to address problems that may arise in clinical consultations. Negotiating trust in any way very easily brings distrust into a situation, but sometimes this can be helpful for building a more functional patient-doctor relationship.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Baier, A. 1986. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 96.

  • Coleman, J.S. 1984. Introducing social structure into economic analysis. American Economic Review Proceedings 74.

  • Coleman, J.S. 1990 Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. 1998. Trust and emotions. Oxford: All Souls.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fugelli, P. 2001. Trust—in general practice. British Journal of General Practice 51.

  • Gambetta, D. 1988. Can we trust trust? In Trust: making and breaking cooperative relations, ed. D. Gambetta. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1992 The theory of communicative action. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. 1995 One for all. The logic of group conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hertzberg, L. 1988. On the attitude of trust. Inquiry 31.

  • Lagerspetz, O. 1996. The tacit demand: A study in trust. Åbo Akademi, Åbo: Filosofiske Institutionen.

  • Løgstrup, K.E. 1986. Den etiske fordring. Copenhagen: Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. 1968. Social theory and social structure. New York: Free press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., and E.A. Shils. (1951) 1962. Toward a general theory of action. New York: Harper & Row.

  • Pellegrino, E.D. 1991. The phenomenon of trust and the patient-physician relationship. In Ethics, trust, and the professions: Philosophical and cultural aspects, ed. E.D. Pellegrino, R.M. Veatch, and J.P. Langan. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skirbekk, H. 1999. Tillit til legen: En drøfting av kommunikasjonsforhold mellom lege og pasient. Department of sociology and human geography. Oslo: University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skjervheim, H. 2002. Deltakar og tilskodar. In Mennesket, ed. J. Hellesnes and G. Skirbekk. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick P., J.H. Beavin, and D.D. Jackson 1967. Pragmatics of human communication: A study in interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1973. Philosophical investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1990. Remarks on the philosophy of psychology. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am very thankful for the support and friendly advice I have received from professor Arnstein Finset at the University of Oslo when writing this paper. Others who deserve thanks for commenting previous versions of this paper are professors Lars Hertzberg at Åbo Akademi University, Gunnar Skirbekk at the University of Bergen and Harald Grimen at Oslo University College.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helge Skirbekk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Skirbekk, H. Negotiated or taken-for-granted trust? Explicit and implicit interpretations of trust in a medical setting. Med Health Care and Philos 12, 3–7 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-008-9142-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-008-9142-2

Keywords

Navigation