Skip to main content
Log in

Results of Pilot Comparisons of Amplitude–Phase Calibrations of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10–500 kHz COOMET 786/RU-a/19

  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

Initiated by COOMET TC 1.2 "Acoustics, Ultrasound, Vibration," bilateral pilot comparisons of amplitude– phase calibrations of hydrophones in the frequency range 10–500 kHz COOMET 786/RU-a/19 between the Hangzhou Research Institute of Applied Acoustics (HAARI) and the Russian Metrological Institute of Technical Physics and Radio Engineering (pilot laboratory) are described. Characteristics of reference hydrophones, data on standard facilities and calibration methods, results of calibrations, and assessments of reference levels of comparisons are provided. The results of comparisons are discussed. The problems that influenced the results of comparisons are mentioned. The correctness of the measurement methods used by the participants of the comparisons, including the method of calculating the frequency dependence of the argument of hydrophone complex sensitivity on the experimental frequency dependence of the modulus of its sensitivity, has been confirmed. The results of the pilot comparisons were found to be satisfactory. When discussing the results of comparisons at the COOMET TC 1.2 meeting, it was proposed to conduct additional comparisons of the results of amplitude–phase calibrations in an expanded composition of participants. The results obtained allow verifying the correctness of the adopted new technical solutions, working out methods for performing measurements and post-processing of the data obtained, identifying and numerically assessing sources of uncertainty, and also establishing previously unaccounted sources of uncertainty when improving primary standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. IEC 60565-1-2020. Underwater Acoustics. Hydrophones. Hydrophones Calibration. Part 1: Procedures for Free-Field Hydrophones Calibration.

References

  1. P. D. Theobald, S. P. Robinson, A. D. Thompson, et al., Technique for the Calibration of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10 to 600 kHz Using a Heterodyne Interferometer and an Acoustically Compliant Membrane, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 118, No. 5, 3110–3116 (2005).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. P. D. Theobald, S. P. Robinson, and A. D. Thompson, The Calibration of Hydrophones by a Novel Optical Technique in the Frequency Range 10 kHz to 600 kHz, Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf. "Underwater Acoustic Measurements: Technologies & Results" (2005).

  3. G. Hayman, Y. Wang, and S. Robinson, A Comparison of Two Methods for Phase Response Calibration of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10–400 kHz, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 133, No. 2, 750–759 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. G. Hayman and S. P. Robinson, Phase Calibration of Hydrophones by the Free-Field Reciprocity Method, Proc. of Meetings on Acoustics ECUA2012, 17, No. 1, Article ID 070026 (2012).

  5. L. D. Luker and A. L. Van Buren, Phase Calibration of Hydrophones, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 70, No. 2, 516–519 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. A. E. Isaev, A. N. Matveev, A. M. Polikarpov, and N. G. Shcherblyuk, Measurement of the Sensitivity Phase–Frequency Characteristics of Hydrophones by the Reciprocity Method, Meas. Tech., 56, No. 6, 706–711 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. E. Isaev and B. I. Khatamtaev, Determination of the Hydrophone Phase–Frequency Response by its Amplitude–Frequency Response, Meas. Tech., 64, No. 7, 580–585 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. G. Hayman and S. P. Robinson, Phase Calibration of Hydrophones by the Free-Field Reciprocity Method, Proc. of Meetings on Acoustics ECUA2012, 17, No. 1, Article ID 070026 (2012).

  9. G. Hayman, Y. Wang, and S. Robinson, A Comparison of Two Methods for Phase Response Calibration of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10–400 kHz, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 133, No. 2, 750–759 (2013).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. A. E. Isaev, Y. Chen, A. N. Matveev, et al., COOMET 786/RU-a/19: Results of Pilot Comparisons of Hydrophones Amplitude–Phase Free-Field Calibrations in the Frequency Range 10–500 kHz, Al'manakh Sovr. Metrol., 32, No. 4, 151–168 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. E. Isaev.

Additional information

Translated from Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika, No. 3, pp. 67–72, March, 2023.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Isaev, A.E., Yi, C., Matveev, A.N. et al. Results of Pilot Comparisons of Amplitude–Phase Calibrations of Hydrophones in the Frequency Range 10–500 kHz COOMET 786/RU-a/19. Meas Tech 66, 211–216 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-023-02212-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-023-02212-x

Keywords

Navigation