Skip to main content
Log in

Research on a Watt-Balance Experimental Model Based on a Monolithic Weight-Measuring Converter

  • MECHANICAL MEASUREMENTS
  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

This article details the combined efforts made by national metrological institutes for the phased distribution of the mass unit that can be traced to the Planck constant, a fundamental physical constant whose numerical value was fixed at the 26th General Conference on Weights and Measures in Paris on May 20, 2019. This article outlines the necessity of studies to maintain the equivalence of the national standard of the unit of mass to that of other countries since it is also the mandatory condition for international recognition of the measuring capabilities of the metrological institutes of the Russian Federation. Then, the watt balance experimental model, which was created at the D. I. Mendeleyev Institute for Metrology, is presented. The watt-balance model's weight-measuring unit, which employs a monolithic converter and a lower suspension to operate on the principle of electromagnetic power compensation, is explained along with its components and workings. Finally, the article presents the results of studies of the metrological characteristics of the watt-balance model. The studies were conducted using standards traceable to the State primary standard of the mass unit and kilogram GET 3-2020. The results showed the potential possibility of applying the design solutions used in the developed and studied watt-balance model to create a reference unit in the Russian Federation that implements the new definition of the kilogram.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. GOST OIML R 111-1-2009. GSI. Weights classes E1, E2, F1, F2, M1, M1–2, M2, M2–3 and M3. Part 1. Metrological and Technical Requirements.

References

  1. A. A. Chernyshenko, "Etalon on the table" ― A new reality in the context of the global transformations of the International System of Units, LETI Trans. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., 15, No. 2, 5–22 (2022).

    Google Scholar 

  2. P. Becker, H. Bettin, H-U. Danzebrink, M. Glaeser, U. Kuetgens, A. Nicolaus, D. Schiel, P. de Bi'evre, S. Valkiers, and P. Taylor, Metrologia, 40, No. 5, 271–287 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/40/5/010.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. P. Clade, F. Biraben, L. Julien, F. Nez, and S. Guelati-Khelifa, Metrologia, 53, No. 5, A75 (2016), https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/53/5ZA75.

  4. B. P. Kibble, I. A. Robinson, and J. H. Bellis, Conf. Precis. Electromagn. Meas., 178–179 (1990), https://doi.org/10.1109/CPEM.1990.109978.

  5. M. Glaser and M. Borys, Rep. Prog. Phys., 72, No. 12 (2009), https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/2/12/126101.

  6. M. Stock, P. Conceigao, H. Fang, et al., Metrologia, 57, No. 1A (2020), https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/57/1A/07030.

  7. B. P. Kibble and I. A. Robinson, Metrologia, 51, No. 2, S132 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/51/2/S132.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. S. Schlamminger and D. Haddad, C. R. Phys., 20, Nos. 1–2, 55–63 (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crhy.2018.11.006.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Rothleitner et al., First Results Using the Planck-Balance, 2018 Conf. Precis. Electromagn. Meas. (CPEM 2018), 1–2 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1109/CPEM.2018.8500904.

  10. I. A. Robinson, J. Berry, C. Bull, S. Davidson, C. Jarvis, P. Lovelock, C. Lucas, J. Urquhart, E. Webster, and P. Williams, 2018 Conf. Precis. Electromagn. Meas. (CPEM 2018), 1–2 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1109/CPEM.2018.8501149.

  11. M. Kim, D. Kim, B. C. Woo, D. Ha, S. U. Lee, H. S. Park, J. Kim, and K. C. Lee, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 18, 945–953 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1007/s12541-017-0112-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Baumann, A. Eichenberger, F. Cosandier, B. Jeckelmann, R. Clavel, D. Reber, and D. Tommasini, Metrologia, 50, No. 3, 235 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394%2F50%2F3%2F235.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Z. Li, Z. Zhang, Y. Lu, P. Hu, Y. Liu, J. Xu, Y. Bai, T. Zeng, G. Wang, Q. You, D. Wang, S. Li, Q. He, and J. Tan, Metrologia, 54, No. 5, 763 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575%2Faa7a65.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu. I. Kamenskikh, V. S. Snegov, Reference Standards-Copies of Mass Unit: Calibration 2020 Using Vacuum Comparator CCL 1007, Meas. Stand. Ref. Mater., 17, No. 2, 59–71 (2021), https://doi.org/10.20915/2077-1177-2021-17-2-59-71.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu. I. Kamenskih.

Additional information

Translated from Izmeritel'naya Tekhnika, No. 1, pp. 31–35, January, 2023.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamenskih, Y.I., Medvedevskih, S.V. & Shmigelskiy, I.Y. Research on a Watt-Balance Experimental Model Based on a Monolithic Weight-Measuring Converter. Meas Tech 66, 31–35 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-023-02186-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-023-02186-w

Keywords

Navigation