Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measurements and Calculations as the Subject Matter of Modern Metrology

  • GENERAL PROBLEMS OF METROLOGY AND MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUE
  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

Abstract

The synonymy issue of measurements and calculations is considered, which long prevented the proper regulatory and procedural analysis of inadequacy issues for the mathematical models of measurement objects, i.e., one of the most important metrological problems. Conceptually, the solution to the problem of inadequacy in the identification of mathematical models using joint measurement data involves a transition from the synonymy of measurements and calculations to the principle of uniform measurement and calculation results. The paper gives a brief description of issues covered by the All-Union discussion on the applicability of probabilistic statistical methods in 1970–1990, which was prompted by Andrey Kolmogorov’s question about the objective meaning of probability. It is noted that in the course of the discussion, criticism was directed at the mathematical results that subsequently formed the basis of the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement and its supplements. The main results of mathematics as a universal scientific language related to the solution of measurement problems are analyzed, thus expanding the understanding of the subject matter of metrology. It is shown that from this point of view, modern metrology is a fundamental science about methods and means of representing the properties of measurement objects by means of mathematical models. While the elementary models consist of quantities and value distributions, more complex models are random functions, functionals, and operators. In addition to measuring instruments, representation means include computational tools having algorithmic, mathematical, and other software to solve measurement problems. It is noted that difficulties arising in the training and professional development of metrologists are related to the problem of inadequacy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. VNIIMISP – All-Union Research Institute for Metrology, Testing, and Standardization in Instrument Engineering

References

  1. H. Lebesgue, Measurement of Quantities [Russian translation], transl. by O. I. Kislovskaya-Karskaya, ed. by. A. N. Kolmogorov, Gosuchpedgiz, Moscow (1938).

  2. S. F. Levin (ed.), Statistical Methods in the Theory of Operational Support in: Vopr. Kibernet., Iss. VK-94, AN SSSR, Moscow (1982).

  3. V. V. Nalimov, Probabilistic Language Model: Correlation between Natural and Artifi cial Languages, Nauka, Moscow (1979) 2nd ed.

  4. Yu. I. Alimov, Alternative to the Method of Mathematical Statistics, Znanie, Moscow (1980).

  5. Yu. I. Alimov, “Practical value of the estimation theory,” Avtomatika, No. 2, 84–94 (1981).

  6. P. E. El’yasberg, Measurement Data: Necessary Amount and Ways to Process It, Nauka, Moscow (1983).

  7. P. V. Novitskii and I. A. Zograf, Estimation of Measurement Errors, Energoatomizdat, Leningrad (1985).

  8. S. F. Levin and A. P. Blinov, “Scientifi c and methodological support for the guaranteed solution of metrological problems using probabilistic and statistical methods,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 12, 5–8 (1988).

  9. Reliability of Programs for Ensuring the Operation of Equipment: Guidelines, Znanie, Kiev (1989).

  10. Statistical Identifi cation, Prediction, and Control: Guidelines, MO SSSR, Moscow (1990).

  11. “Statistical identification, prediction, and control” [in Russian], in: Proc. 2nd All-Union Scientific and Technical Seminar, September 4–6, 1991, Sevastopol; Znanie, Sevastopol (1991).

  12. Monitoring of Technical Facilities According to Emergency and Defi ning Parameters: Guidelines, Znanie, Kiev (1992).

  13. H. Scheffé, The Analysis of Variance, J. Wiley & Sons, New York (1959).

  14. G. A. Korn and T. M. Korn, Mathematical Handbook for Scientists and Engineers, McGRAW-Hill Book Company, New York (1961).

  15. J. Van Ryzin (ed.), “Classifi cation and clustering,” in: Proc. Adv. Seminar Conducted by the Mathematics Research Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, May 3–5, 1976, Academic Press, New York (1977).

  16. R. P. Runion, Nonparametric Statistics: A Contemporary Approach, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company (1977).

  17. F. Mosteller and J. W. Tukey, Data Analysis and Regression: A Second Course in Statistics, Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, USA (1977).

  18. M. Hollander and D. A. Wolfe, Nonparametric Statistical Methods, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1999).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. P. Huber, Robust Statistics, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1981).

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. I. Vuchkov, L. Boyadzhieva, and E. Solakov, Applied Linear Regression Analysis [Russian translation], Finansy i Statistika, Moscow (1987).

  21. F. R. Hampel, E. M. Ronchetti, P. J. Rousseeuw, and W. A. Stahel, Robust Statistics: the Approach Based on Influence Functions, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1986).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. A. N. Kolmogorov, “The real meaning of analysis results,” in: Proc. 2nd All-Union Meeting on Math. Statistics, Tashkent, Sept. 27 – Oct. 2, 1948, Izd. AN UzSSR, Tashkent (1949), pp. 240–268.

  23. E. S. Ventsel, “Current procedural characteristics of mathematics,” in: Mathematicians about Mathematics, Znanie, Moscow (1982), pp. 37–55.

  24. Yu. P. Adler, Yu. V. Granovsky, and E. V. Markova, Theory of Experiment: Past, Present, and Future, Znanie, Moscow (1982).

  25. V. N. Tutubalin, Probability Theory: A Short Course. Scientific and Methodological Commentary, Izd. MGU, Moscow (1972).

  26. I. M. Vinogradov (ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Sov. Еntsiklopediya, Moscow (1977), Vol. 1.

  27. I. M. Vinogradov (ed.), Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Sov. Еntsiklopediya, Moscow (1979), Vol. 2.

  28. S. F. Levin (ed.), “Statistical analysis of systems ensuring operation of technical facilities,” in: Vopr. Kibernet., Iss. VK-94, AN SSSR, Moscow (1982), pp. 105–122.

  29. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement [Russian translation], VNIIM, St. Petersburg (1999).

  30. International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts and Associated Terms, VIM (2007), 3rd ed.

  31. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement, ISO, Switzerland (1993), 1st ed.

  32. W. Bich, et al., Metrologia, 49 (6), 702–705 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/49/6/702

  33. S. F. Levin, “Newton-Euler principle, probability concepts, and Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement,” in: Proc. 13th Int. Sci. Tech. Seminar. Measurement Uncertainty: Scientifi c, Legislative, Methodological, and Applied aspects (UM-2016), Minsk, Belarus, April 13–14, 2016, BelGIM, Minsk (2016), pp. 78–81.

  34. A. de Moivre, The Doctrine of Chances, Wood full, London (1738).

  35. P. Laplace, Complete Works, Gauthier-Villars, Paris (1878), Vol. 14.

  36. C. F. Gauss, Selected Geodetic Work, Vol. 1, Least-Squares Method [Russian translation], Izd. Geodez. Lit., Moscow (1957).

  37. A. M. Legendre, New Methods for the Determination of Comet Orbits, F. Didot, Paris (1805).

  38. C. G. J. Jacobi, “On functional determinants,” J. Reine Angew. Math., No. 22, 319–359 (1841).

  39. K. Pearson, “Contributions to the mathematical theory of evolution,” Philos. T. R. Soc. Lond., A, 71–110 (1894).

  40. P. L. Chebyshev, Selected Works, Izd. Akad. Nauk, Moscow (1955).

  41. M. Lyapunov, “Une proposition générale du calcul de probabilitiés,” Comptes Rendus de l’Acad. des Sciences, 132, 814–815 (1901).

  42. A. S. Eddington, Stellar Movements and the Structure of the Universe, Macmillan, London (1914).

  43. P. Lévy, Calcul des Probabilitiés [in French], Gauthir-Villars, Paris (1925).

  44. N. V. Smirnov a nd I. V. Dunin-Barkovskii, A Course in Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics for Technical Applications: Textbook, Nauka, Moscow (1969), 3rd ed.

  45. A. N. Kolmogorov, Probability Theory and Mathematical Statistics, Nauka, Moscow (1986).

  46. S. S. Wilks, “Statistical prediction with special reference to the problem of tolerance limits,” Ann. Math. Stat., 13, 400–409 (1942).

  47. H. Robbins, “On distribution-free tolerance limits in random sampling,” Ann. Math. Stat., 15, 214–216 (1944).

  48. H. Scheffé and J. W. Tukey, “Nonparametric estimation. I. Validation of order statistics,” Ann. Math. Stat., 16, 187–192 (1945).

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. F. Wilcoxon, “Individual comparisons by ranking methods,” Biometrics, 1, 80–83 (1945).

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. M. H. Quenouille, “Approximate tests of correlation in time-series,” J. R. Stat. Soc., No. B 11, 68–84 (1949).

  51. M. Stone, “Cross-valedictory choice and assessment of statistical predictions,” J. R. Stat. Soc. B, 36, No 2, 111–147 (1974).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. H. Akaike, “A new look at the statistical model identification,” IEEE T. Automat. Contr., AC-19, 716–723 (1974).

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. G. Wahba, “Spline bases, regularization, and generalized cross validation for solving approximation problems with large quantities of noisy data,” in: Proc. Int. Conf. on Approximation Theory III, W. Cheney (ed.), Academic Press, New York (1980), pp. 905–912.

  54. M. Rosenblatt, Ann. Math. Stat., 27 (3), 832–837 (1956). https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177728190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. E. Parzen, Ann. Math. Stat., 33 (3), 1065–1076 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177704472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. R. A. Fisher, Mon. Notices Royal Astron. Soc., 80, 758–770 (1920). https://doi.org/10.1093/MNRAS/80.8.758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. J. W. Tukey, “A survey of sampling from contaminated distributions,” in: Contributions to Probability and Statistics, I. Olkin (ed.), Stanford University Press, Stanford (1960), pp. 448–485.

  58. J. L.-Jr. Hodges and E. L. Lehmann, Ann. Math. Stat., 34, No. 2, 598–611 (1963), https://doi.org/10.1214/aoms/1177704172

  59. Yu. V. Linnik, Method of Least Squares and Principles of the Theory of Observation, Fizmatgiz, Moscow (1962), 2nd ed.

  60. G. Ivakhnenko, “Group method of data handling as an alternative to the method of stochastic approximation,” Avtomatika, No. 3, 58–72 (1968).

  61. W. Feller, An Introduction to Probability Theory and Its Applications, J. Wiley & Sons, New York-London-Sydney-Toronto (1971), 2nd. ed., Vol. II.

  62. B. Efron, “Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife,” Ann. Stat., 7, No 1, 1–26 (1979).

  63. S. F. Levin, Fundamentals of Control Theory, MO SSSR, Moscow (1983).

  64. V. A. Kuznetsov and G. V. Yalunina, Metrology (theoretical, applied, and legislative basis): Textbook, Izd. Standartov, Moscow (1998).

  65. V. A. Kuznetsov and G. V. Yalunina, General Metrology, Izd. Standartov, Moscow (2001).

  66. V. A. Kuznetsov (ed.), L. K. Isaev, and I. A. Shaiko, Metrology, Standartinform, Moscow (2005).

  67. O. Fritsch and J. Santamaria, “Aviation safety – a review of the 1985 record,” ICAO Bull., 41, No 10, 15–17 (1988).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Moscow Institute for Expertise and Tests, Moscow, Russia

    S. F. Levin

Authors
  1. S. F. Levin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. F. Levin.

Additional information

Translated from Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, No. 5, pp. 15–21, May, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Levin, S.F. Measurements and Calculations as the Subject Matter of Modern Metrology. Meas Tech 65, 321–329 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-022-02089-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-022-02089-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation