Skip to main content
Log in

Verification of the Method for Assessing Systematic Errors of the Bench for Calibrating Six-Component Strain-Gauge Balances

  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

This article discusses systematic errors of the 6GS-40M calibration machine. This machine was designed at the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute for the calibration of external and internal six-component strain-gauge balances with a maximum normal force of 40 kN. Based on the requirements of the aerodynamic characteristic errors of aircraft models during their tests in wind tunnels, the error of calibration benches, referred to as half the range of each of the six weight components on the bench, should not exceed 0.05%. A method was developed for the experimental evaluation of the systematic errors of the calibration machine, and such errors were determined. Previously derived analytical expressions for the systematic errors were verified using the obtained error values. We estimated the corrections to the loads set by the 6GS-40M calibration machine to external and internal six-component strain-gauge balances. The correction range was 0.09% to 0.90% for the different components of the balances. The developed experimental determination method of systematic errors may be used for other calibration machines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. Frank, Experience Relative to the Interaction between Balance Engineer and the Project Engineer with Regard to Measurement Uncertainty, First international Symposium on Strain Gauge Balances, USA, October 22–25, 243–277 (1996) available at: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19990072764/downloads/19990072764.pdf (accessed: 02/07/2022).

  2. K. D. Bukharov, A. R. Gorbushin, Yu. V. Kartashev, V. V. Petronevich, I. A. Sudakova, and S.L. Chernyshev, TsAGi Sci J, 48, No. 7, 627–647 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1615/TsAGISciJ.2018026242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. V. P. Gusev, V. I. Tikhomirov, Osnovnye Sistematicheskie Pogreshnosti Kalibrovochnogo Stenda MSEH-000 [In Russian], Trudy TSAGi, 2207, 107–114 (1983).

  4. First international Symposium on Strain Gauge Balances, USA, October 22–25, (1996), available at: https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19990072764/downloads/19990072764.pdf (accessed: 02/07/2022).

  5. B.F.R. Ewald, Meas Sci Technol, 11, No. 6, 81–94 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/11/6/201.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. K. Hufnagel, M. Quade, Proceedings 45th AiAA Aerospace Sci. Meeting and Exhibit., 08–11 January 2007, Reno, Nevada, AIAA (2007). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2007-148.

  7. Ben-hua Zhu, Lei Liang, “Crucial technology analysis on restoration measurement of automatic balance calibration system,” Ordnance Ind. Automat., 28 (12), 79–88 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Lin Xiong, Jinyin Wang, Jiahua Liu, Shuai Wen, Chun-feng Liu, and Jiang Ping, J,. Exp. Fluid Mech., 29 (6), 84–88 (2015). https://doi.org/10.11729/syltlx20140144.

  9. D. Landman, K. G. Toro, S. A. Commo, and K. C. Lynn, J. Aircr., 52, No. 3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.2514/TC032930.

  10. V. S. Volobuyev, A. R. Gorbushin, I. A. Sudakova, and V. I. Tikhomirov, TsAGi Sci. J., 48, No. 2, 187–197 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1615/TsAGISciJ.2017021104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. A. Bol'shakova, V. S. Volobuev, A. R. Gorbushin, and V. V. Petronevich, Meas. Tech., 60, No. 8, 763–770 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-017-1268-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Toro, D. Burns, and P.A. Parker, Aerodynamic Measurement Technology and Ground Testing Conference, June 25–29, 2018, Atlanta, Georgia, AIAA, 4108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2018-4108.

  13. M.N. Danilov, P.P. Bardaev, AiP Conf. Proc., 2125, (2019) 030091. https://doi.org/10.1063/15117473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Simpson, D. Landman, R. Giroux, M. Zeisset, B. Hall, and R. Rhew, U.S. Air Force T&E Days, 06–08 December 2005, Nashville, Tennessee, AIAA, 7601 (2005). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2005-7601.

  15. V. V. Burov, V. S. Volobuev, S. A. Glazkov, A. R. Gorbushin, and E. K. Chumachenko, Automation and remote control, 72, 634–641 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0005117911030143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. S. A. Glazkov, A. R. Gorbushin, A. I. Ivanov, and A. V. Semenov, Prog. Aerosp. Sci., 37, No. 3, 263–298 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0376-0421(01)00007-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. J. Quest, D. Schimanski, Proceedings 41th AiAA Aerospace Sci. Meeting and Exhibit., 06–09 January 2003, Reno, Nevada, AIAA, 2003, 755. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2003-755.

  18. Gorbushin, A.R., Kolesnikov, A.I., Meas. Tech., 62, No. 2, 118–125 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-019-01595-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. K. G. Toro, P. A. Parker, AiAA Aviation 2019 Forum, 17–21 June 2019, Dallas, Texas, AIAA, 2807 (2019). https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-2807.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to V. S. Volobuev.

Additional information

Translated from Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, No. 2, pp. 44–50, February, 2022.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volobuev, V.S., Gorbushin, A.R. & Zavyalov, V.A. Verification of the Method for Assessing Systematic Errors of the Bench for Calibrating Six-Component Strain-Gauge Balances. Meas Tech 65, 129–136 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-022-02058-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-022-02058-9

Keywords

Navigation