The paper considers a problem associated with the identification and verification of criteria for selecting a transducer depending on the expected input-criteria for the applicability of impulse (dynamic) pressure transducers on the basis of their dynamic characteristics. In this work, principles applied in the field of impulse pressure measurement are systematized. In addition, the dynamic characteristics of several impulse (dynamic) pressure transducers are experimentally studied, their transfer functions are obtained, and the responses of these transducers to a set input are simulated. An experimental method for obtaining a transfer function using a pneumatic shock tube and appropriate software solutions is proposed. The study confirms the lack of a single universal applicability criterion for impulse (dynamic) pressure transducers depending on the expected input. The obtained results can be used when selecting the required transducer to measure impulse (dynamic) pressure for various scientific and technical applications.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
V. E. Bean, “Dynamic Pressure Metrology,” Metrologia, 30, No. 6, 737–741 (1994), https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/30/6/037.
L. Tomasi, E. Wieser, E. Baruah, et al., “Development of a new piezoelectric dynamic pressure generator for high pressure periodic and aperiodic calibration,” Proc. 17th IMEKO World Congr., Dubrovnik, Croatia, June 22–27, 2003, IMEKO and HMD Publ. (2003), pр. 1995–1996.
T. T. Tsing, Ch. Ho, L. Ch. Chen, et al., Meas. Sci. Technol., 14, 1927–1937 (2003), https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/14/11/010.
L. Elkarous, F. Coghe, M. Pirlot, and J. C. Golinval, J. Phys., Conf. Ser., No. 459, 012048 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/459/1/012048.
Th. Bruns, E. Franke, and M. Kobusch, Metrologia, No. 50, 580–585 (2013), https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/50/6/580.
J. Salminen, R. Hogstrom, S. Saxholm, et al., Metrologia, 55, No. 2, S52–S59 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1088/1681-7575/aaa847.
E. E. Bagdat’ev, A. A. Efimova, and E. B. Sanina, “Pulse installation for identification of variable pressure transmitters,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 3, 18–19 (1989).
E. A. Kuznetsov, “Automated complex for determining the static and dynamic characteristics of pressure transducers across a wide temperature range,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 6, 40–43 (1993).
M. Serridge and R. L. Torben, Piezoelectric Accelerometer and Vibration Preamplifier: Handbook, Larsen and Son, Denmark (1987).
P. L. Walter, Shock and Blast Measurement – Rise Time Capability of Measurement Systems? www.pcb.com/contentstore/MktgContent/linkeddocuments/technotes/TN-11-0904_Calculating_Rise_Time.pdf, acc. Sept. 5, 2021.
A. G. Strizhnev, A. V. Markov, and A. N. Rusakovich, “Control object identifi cation using closed-loop system transient response,” Dokl. BGUIR, No. 5 (67), 65–72 (2012).
A. Gaydon and I. Hurle, The Shock Tube in High-Temperature Chemical Physics [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1966).
С. Matthews, F. Pennecchi, S. Eichstädt, et al., Metrologia, 51, No. 3, 326–338 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/51/3/326.
A. V. Shipunov, “Determination of dynamic characteristics exhibited by piezoelectric pressure transducers: a comparative analysis of methods,” Prib. Sist. Upravl., No. 7, 35–37 (1999).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated from Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, No. 10, pp. 34–40, October, 2021.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nedbaylo, A.A. Impulse Pressure Transducers: Applicability Criteria. Meas Tech 64, 824–831 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-022-02010-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-022-02010-x