Skip to main content
Log in

Standard Installation for the Transmission of Units of Sound Pressure in the Ultrasonic Frequency Range

  • ACOUSTIC MEASUREMENTS
  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

We present information about a standard installation used for the calibration of hydrophones at frequencies of 0.1–3.0 MHz. The installation is created with an aim to extend the frequency range of the GET 55-2017 State Primary Standard to the region of high-frequency ultrasound. The necessity of development of this installation is justified. We briefly consider basic principles of its operation and the possibilities of measurements. The requirements to the characteristics of ultrasonic transducers are discussed. In the choice of standard transducers, we give priority to their time stability because, in the course of transmission of the unit with the help of a tone signal, the uniformity of the frequency characteristic of sensitivity of the transducer is not of primary importance. To reduce the influence of directivity, we use a precise four-coordinate system of positioning of the transducers, which includes the possibility of control of their mutual positions with the help of a laser beam. We also consider the problems connected with the possibility of passing to higher frequencies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. N. Lekomtsev A. V. Torgunako, D. V. Titarenko, and V. K. Smirnov, “Technology of production of 3D sound-imaging devices intended for the survey of vertical walls in turbid water with the use of electron-mechanical scanning at a distance up to 100 m,” Sovr. Tend. Razv. Nauki Tehnol., No. 3–3, 72–76 (2017).

    Google Scholar 

  2. V. N. Lekomtsev and D. V. Titarenko, “Contemporary units of the underwater sound-imaging equipment,” Sovr. Tekhnol. Avtomatiz. (2011), https://www.cta.ru/cms/f/441553.pdf, acc. 12.19.2019.

  3. A. E. Isaev and A. N. Matveev, “Calibration of hydrophones in a fi eld with continuous radiation in a reverberating pool,” Akust. Zh., 55, No. 6, 727–73 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Р. Robinson, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 120, No. 3, 1366–1373 (2006), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1121/1.2228790.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Malarkodi, G. Latha, M. A. Atmanand, et al., “Interlaboratory comparisons of hydrophone calibration in the 3–500 kHz frequency range,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 1, 69–72 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. E. Isaev, A. N. Matveev, A. M. Polikarpov, and N. G. Shcherblyuk, “Measurement of the sensitivity phase-frequency responses of hydrophones by the reciprocity method,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 6, 56–59 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. N. G. Shcherblyuk, “Modernization of the GET 55-2011 standard installation; phase calibration of hydrophones,” Tekhn. Probl. Osv. Mir. Okeana, 6, 246–250 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  8. G. Hayman and S. Robinson, Proc. 11th Europ. Conf. on Underwater Acoustics, Edinburgh (2012), pp. 1437–1444.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ultrasound Hydrophone Calibration, https://www.npl.co.uk/products-services/ultrasound/hydrophonecalibration, acc. 12.19.2019.

  10. E. G. Radulescu, P. A. Lewin, J. Wójcik, and A. Nowicki, Ultrasonics, 41, No. 4, 247–254 (2003), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0041-624X(03)00123-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to А. Е. Isaev.

Additional information

Translated from Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, No. 6, pp. 61–65, June, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Isaev, А.Е., Polikarpov, А.М., Sil’vestrov, S.V. et al. Standard Installation for the Transmission of Units of Sound Pressure in the Ultrasonic Frequency Range. Meas Tech 63, 487–492 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-020-01813-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-020-01813-0

Keywords

Navigation