Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Method for Determining the Measurement Uncertainty of the Detailing Coefficients of the Wavelet Transform of Image Brightness Profiles

  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

This study analyzed the relevance of using measurement methods based on visual data and identified the main problems that arise when calculating the measurement uncertainty of the estimates of quantitative characteristics of images in automated image analysis systems due to the lack of general recommendations for this type of calculation. Moreover, the study highlights the challenges in developing a method for calculating the measurement uncertainty of the detailing coefficients of the wavelet transform applied to the automated analysis of gas-discharge radiation images of water. To evaluate the biological properties of water and highlight the corresponding informative features of the gas-discharge radiation images, a one-dimensional wavelet transform of the brightness profile is proposed. This method of calculating the uncertainty is based on the results of repeated cases and helps reveal the measurement uncertainty of the quantitative characteristics of the images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. V. Fomin, A. P. Mikhailovich, A. S. Popov, et al., “Metrological aspects of image analysis,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 2, 26–28 (2008).

  2. Yu. V. Shalaumova, Development and Research of a Presentation Model and Methods for Processing Information about Complex, Poorly Formalized Objects for a Photolandscape Database: Auth. Abstr. Cand. Dissert. in Techn. Sci., Yekaterinburg (2013).

  3. A. Almazroa, S. Alodhayb, K. Raahemifar, and V. Lakshminarayanan, “An automatic image processing system for glaucoma screening,” Int. J. Biomed. Imag. (2017), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4826385.

  4. Su Ye, R. Gilmore Pontius Jr., and R. Rakshit, ISPRS J. Photogramm., No. 141, 137–147 (2018), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.04.002.

  5. L. Rose and G. Lobet, Meth. Ecol. Evol., No. 2, 1594–1606 (2019), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.13156.

  6. E. Del Giudice, A. Tedeschi, V. Voeikov, and G. Vitiello, Res. Signpost, India, No. 37/661 (2), 19 (2015), DOI: https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2329.1046.

  7. B. Johansson and S. Sukhotskya, Funct. Food Health Dis., No. 6, 388–413 (2016), DOI: https://doi.org/10.31989/ffhd.v6i6.265.

  8. E. V. Kryzhanovskii, The Method of Control of Liquid-Phase Objects Based on Gas-Discharge Visualization: Cand. Dissert. in Techn. Sci., St. Petersburg (2003).

  9. A. Abella, A. Amoros, M. Gonzalez, et al., Water, No. 3, 165–171 (2017), DOI: https://doi.org/10.14294/WATER.2017.3.

  10. N. V. Glukhova, “Cluster analysis of the results of measurements of parameters of gas-discharge radiation of blood samples,” Metrologiya, No. 3, 58–66 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  11. I. Bell, D. A. Lewis, A. J. Brooks, et al., J. Altern. Compl. Med., No. 9, 25–37 (2003), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1089/107555302317373760.

  12. R. A. Alexandrova, G. B. Fedoseev, K. G. Korotkov, et al., “Analysis of systematic errors and data reproducibility in the GDI method,” in: Proc. 4th Int. Congr. Science. Information. Consciousness, July 10–12, 2000, St. Petersburg, SPbITMO, St. Petersburg (2000), pp. 1–4.

  13. M. V. Borisova, E. V. Kryzhanovsky, and V. L. Tkalich, “Evaluation of the error of experimental results in the study of bioelectrography by the GDI method,” Izv. VUZ. Priborostroyeniye, 49, No. 2, 30–31 (2006).

    Google Scholar 

  14. K. G. Korotkov, Stability and Reproducibility of GDV Parameters. From the Kirlian Effect to Bioelectrography, SPbITMO, St. Petersburg (1997), pp. 94–95.

  15. N. V. Glukhova, Inform. Proc. Syst., No. 6 (143), 32–35 (2016).

  16. N. V. Glukhova, News Nat. Techn. Univ. “KhPI.” Ser. Informat. Model., No. 33 (1142), 20–27 (2015).

  17. N. V. Glukhova, “Measuring and computing techniques in technological processes of VOTTP-15,” in: Abstr. 15th Int. Sci. Technol. Conf., Odessa, Ukraine (2015), p. 73.

  18. A. N. Akansu, W. A. Serdijn, and I. W. Selesnick, Phys. Commun., 3, No. 1, 1–18 (2010), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phycom.2009.07.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. A. M. Grzhibovsky, “Analysis of three or more groups of quantitative data,” Ekol. Cheloveka, No. 3, 50–58 (2008).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dnipro University of Technology, Dnipro, Ukraine

    N. V. Glukhova

Authors
  1. N. V. Glukhova
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. V. Glukhova.

Additional information

Translated from Metrologiya, No. 1, pp. 28–47, January–March, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glukhova, N.V. Method for Determining the Measurement Uncertainty of the Detailing Coefficients of the Wavelet Transform of Image Brightness Profiles. Meas Tech 63, 177–183 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-020-01769-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-020-01769-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation