Skip to main content
Log in

Accounting for Instability of the Metrological Characteristics of Means of Measurement When Choosing a Verification Method

  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

A complex statistical simulation model is used to analyze two methods of verification– rejection and calibration. The dependences of the maximum permissible instability of the metrological characteristics of means of measurement on the ratio of the limit of error for the tested means of measurement to the limit of error of the working standard, as well as on the method of verification and the variant for confirmation of conformity are obtained. It is proposed that when choosing the method for verification of means of measurement that the dependence of the instability of their metrological characteristics on the limit of error for different methods of verification and variants of confirmation of conformity should be used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A. E. Friedman, Foundations of Metrology, A Modern Course, NPO Professional, St. Petersburg (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. S. F. Beckert and W. S. Paim, Int. J. Metrol. Qual. Eng., No. 8 (23), 1–9 (2017), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/ijmqe/2017016.

  3. I. P. Zakharov, P. I. Neezhmakov, and O. A. Botsyura, “Establishing the suitability of a calibrated means of measurement based on the probability of the correspondence of its metrological characteristics to the document technical specifications,” Zakonodat. Prikl. Metrol., No. 4, 19–22 (2018).

  4. A. A. Danilov, D. V. Spuntova, and Yu. G. Tyurina, “A method for determining the intervals between calibrations of means of measurement,” Zakonodat. Prikl. Metrol., No. 4, 15–18 (2018).

  5. M. V. Berzhinskaya and A. A. Danilov, “Theoretical foundations of the experimental determination of error from the temporal instability of means of measurement,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 3, 11–12 (2009).

  6. N. T. Boymatov, R. R. Jabbarov, and O. S. Khakimov, Inform. Proc. Syst., 4, No. 85, 111–113 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. V. Yurov, “Estimating the quality of testing methods and verifi cation schemes,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 1, 27–32 (2015).

  8. L. V. Yurov, “Optimization of the testing of means of measurement by rejection,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 2, 3–5 (2019).

  9. V. S. Gmerev and D. Shevchenko, “Ways of improving procedures for testing and calibration of means of measuring temperature in a gas transport system,” in: Innovative Scientifi c Studies: Theory, Methodology, Practice: Proc. Sci. Pract. Conf., G. Yu. Gulyaev (ed.), Penza, Nov. 15, 2016, Nauka i Prosveshchenie, Penza (2016), pp. 17–21.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. S. Doynikov.

Additional information

Translated from Metrologiya, No. 1, pp. 3–14, January–March, 2020.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Doynikov, A.S., Hrapov, F.I. & Yurov, L.V. Accounting for Instability of the Metrological Characteristics of Means of Measurement When Choosing a Verification Method. Meas Tech 63, 166–170 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-020-01767-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-020-01767-3

Keywords

Navigation