Measurement Techniques

, Volume 61, Issue 4, pp 327–334 | Cite as

Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement: Problems, Unrealized Capabilities, and Revisions. Part 2. Probabilistic-Statistical Problems

  • S. F. LevinEmail author

Problems related to estimation of precision in connection with revisions to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement are considered.


method of indirect measurements compositional approach interpolation conception of probability inadequacy error moment approach subjective conception of probability definitional uncertainty 


  1. 1.
    GOST 54500.3–2011/Guide ISO/MEK 98-3:2008, Measurement Uncertainty. Part 3. Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    GOST R ISO/MEK 17025–2009, General Requirements of Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    GOST 8.061–80, GSI. Calibration Chains. Content and Construction.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    S. F. Levin, “Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement: revision – change in paradigm or new sanction?” Zakonodat. Prikl. Metrol., No. 5, 31–44 (2016).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    V. A. Kuznetsov and G. V. Yapulina, Metrology: Theoretical, Applied, and Legal Aspects, IPK Izd. Standartov, Moscow (1998).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    F. P. Tarasenko, Nonparametric Statistics, Izd. Tomsk. University, Tomsk (1976).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    S. F. Levin, “Theory of errors: the old paradigms and ‘new’ alternatives,” Metrologiya, 3–18 (2007).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    R 50.2.004–2000, GSI. Determination of the Characteristics of Mathematical Models of Dependences between Physical Quantities in the Solution of Measurement Problems. Basic Assumptions.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    MI 2916–2005, GSI. Identification of Probability Distributions in the Solution of Measurement Problems.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    MI 188–86, GSI. Measuring Instruments. Establishing the Values of the Parameters of Verification Techniques.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    R 50.1.037–2002, Applied Statistics. Rules for Verification of Goodness-of-Fit of a Trial Distribution with a Theoretical Distribution. Part II. Nonparametric Criteria.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    GOST R ISO 5725–80, Precision (regular and exact) of Methods and Results of Measurements.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    GOST R 50779.21–2004, Statistical Methods. Rules for Determination and Methods of Calculation of Statistical Characteristics from Sample Data. Part 1. Normal Distribution.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    G. Korn and T. Korn, Handbook on Mathematics for Scientific Workers and Engineers [Russian translation], Nauka, Moscow (1968).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    M. Cox and P. Harris, “Basic assumptions of Appendix 1 to the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 4, 17–24 (2005).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    S. F. Levin, “Uncertainty in the narrow and wide senses of the results of verification of measuring instruments,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 9, 15–19 (2007).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    International Dictionary on Metrology VIM3, NPO Proressional, St. Petersburg (2010).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    RMG 29–2013, GSI. Metrology. Basic Terms and Definitions.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Physics Encyclopedia, Great Soviet Encyclopedia, Moscow (1992), Vol. 3.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    GOST R 50779.10–2000, Statistical Methods. Probability and Foundations of Statistics. Terms and Definitions.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    A. N. Kolmogorov, “On tables of random numbers,” Semiot. Informat., Iss. 18, 3–13 (1982).Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    S. F. Levin, “Newton–Euler principle, conception of probability and the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement,” Metrol. Priborostr., No. 3 (73), 28–31 (2016).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    GOST 8.009–84, GSI. Normed Metrological Characteristics of Measuring Instruments.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    GOST R 8.820–2013, GSI. Metrological Assurance. Basic Assumptions.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Moscow Institute of Appraisal and TestingMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations