Skip to main content
Log in

Interlaboratory Comparisons of Hydrophone Calibration in the 3–500 kHz Frequency Range

  • INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION
  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

A method and results are described for international interlaboratory comparisons of hydroacoustic measurement reference standards. The comparison was organized by the National Institute of Ocean Technology, India, with the participation of reference standards from Germany and Russia. Data are presented on the reference standard installations of the comparison participants and the measurement methods used, and the impact of water temperature on comparison results during calibration is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ISO/IEC 17025:2005, General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories.

  2. IEC 60565 (2006), Underwater Acoustics. Hydrophones. Calibration in the Frequency Range 0.01 Hz to 1 MHz.

  3. A. Isaev and A. N. Matveev, “Calibration of hydrophones in a field with continuous radiation in a reverberating pool,” Akust. Zh., 55, No. 6, 727–736 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. Isaev, “Reducing the influence of a transition process in field calibration of hydrophones at low frequencies with the use of quadrature-added harmonic signals,” Izmer. Tekhn., No. 4, 2–24 (2010).

  5. GOST R 54500.3–2011, Measurement Uncertainty. Part 3. Handbook on Expressing Measurement Uncertainty.

  6. Hydrophones Types 8103, 8104, 8105, 8106: Technical Documentation, Brüel & Kjær (1992).

  7. S. P. Robinson, "Final report for key comparison CCAUV.W-K1: Calibration of hydrophones in the frequency range from 1 kHz to 500 kHz," NPL Report DQL-AC 009, NPL (2004), http://publications.npl.co.uk/npl_web/pdf/dql_ac9.pdf, acces. 05.27.2015

  8. S. P. Robinson, “An international key comparison of free-field hydrophone calibrations in the frequency range 1 to 500 kHz,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 120, 1366–1373 (2006).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Chen, A. E. Isaev, et al. “The COOMET Pilot Comparison 473/RU-a/09: Comparison of hydrophone calibrations in the frequency range 250 Hz to 200 kHz,” Metrologia, Tech. Suppl., 48, 09004, 1–12 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. G. Cox, “The evaluation of key comparison data,” Metrologia, 39, 589–595 (2002).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Malarkodi.

Additional information

Translated from Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, No. 1, pp. 69–72, January, 2016.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Malarkodi, A., Latha, G., Atmanand, M.A. et al. Interlaboratory Comparisons of Hydrophone Calibration in the 3–500 kHz Frequency Range. Meas Tech 59, 99–103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-016-0924-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-016-0924-2

Keywords

Navigation