Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selection of Verification Methods for Measurement Instruments Under Restricted Resource Conditions

  • Published:
Measurement Techniques Aims and scope

We consider criteria for selecting deterministic and stochastic decision methods for labor-intensive problems of verification (testing) of measurement instruments. The decision process is modeled using the mathematical framework of game theory. The criterion is based on the comparison of available resources with the cardinality of the set of problem-solving strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R. McMinn, “Search-based software test data generation: A survey,” Software Testing, Verif. Reliab., 14, No. 2, 105–156, (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. S. Markov, “Paradigm for Bounded Stochastic Control,” Izv. Inst. Inzh. Fiz., No. 1, 15–19 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  3. I. Sh. Khisambeev, “The role of stochastic testing in the functional verification of microprocessors,” Progr. Prod. Sist., No. 3, 107–112 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  4. S. Filimonov, “Structure and Principles of Building of Automated Simulation System for Technical Objects Control Programs Debugging,” Automation, Control and Information Technology: Proc. IASTED Int. Conf., Anaheim, Calgary, Zürich (2002), pp. 53–55.

  5. G. Wen, Theory of Games [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  6. T. Parthasarathi and T. Raghavan, Certain Questions in the Theory of Two-Person Games [Russian translation], Mir, Moscow (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. von Neumann and O. Morgenstern, Theory of Games and Economic Behavior [Russian translation], Nauka, Moscow (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  8. S. N. Zaichenko, V. V. Khartov, and S. N. Filimonov, “Method of automatic synthesis of test programs for processors,” Prib. Sist. Uprav., Kontrol, Diagnost., No. 4. 50–54 (2006).

  9. R. A. Frohwerk, “Signature analysis: a new digital field service method,” Hewlett-Packard J., 28, No. 9, 2–8 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  10. K. G. Kir’yanov, Signature Analysis: Handbook of Methods [in Russian], Izd. Nizhegor. Gos. Univ., N. Novgorod (1999).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Central Research Institute for Communications, Moscow, Russia

    S. N. Filimonov

Authors
  1. S. N. Filimonov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. N. Filimonov.

Additional information

Translated from Izmeritel’naya Tekhnika, No. 1, pp. 13–16, January, 2014.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Filimonov, S.N. Selection of Verification Methods for Measurement Instruments Under Restricted Resource Conditions. Meas Tech 57, 16–21 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-014-0400-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11018-014-0400-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation